Posted on

FL- Governor, lawmakers differ on Medicaid ‘critical care’ funding – South Florida Business Journal

MM Curator summary

[MM Curator Summary]: Hospitals are crying foul, but legislators say hospitals are crying wolf because the hospitals just got $100M in the direct payments program for Medicaid.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

Health care funding

krisanapong detraphiphat

As state legislators head into budget negotiations, both chambers have agreed to eliminate additional “critical care” funding for hospitals that treat the most Medicaid patients. Those dollars are used to give automatic rate enhancements to those hospitals. And Gov. Ron DeSantis, in his budget recommendations, included recurring funding for the hospitals.

But House budget writers didn’t just eliminate the so-called critical care fund. The House recommended removing an additional $100 million in state money (which is matched with federal Medicaid funds) currently used to reimburse hospitals and steer the money instead to help train future nurses. All told, it’s a nearly $252 million reduction to hospital inpatient and outpatient reimbursement rates and a $100 million bump to higher education.

House leaders defend the move because hospitals are getting money from a new supplemental Medicaid financing program called Direct Provider Payment or DPP. DPP is allowable under a federal waiver and lets hospitals use funds to bridge the difference between Medicaid reimbursements and their costs of providing the care. Florida does not contribute any state dollars to the DPP program. Instead, it is funded with local tax dollars generated by hospitals.

“They are contorting themselves because they believe they never should be cut,” said House Speaker Chris Sprowls, who pointed out that hospitals had their “second-best year” last year because of the enhanced funding they received. “They have a significant influx of money … and all we hear is ‘oh the sky is falling.'”

Sprowls also said it’s time to act because the state has a “significant nursing shortage,” and hospitals should have “skin in the game” to solve the problem.

Florida Hospital Association President and CEO Mary Mayhew, whose association commissioned the report that identifies the current and looming shortfall, said the goal to increase education funding is laudable. Hospitals currently partner with colleges and universities to train staff, she said. But, she noted, increasing education funding “really shouldn’t be supported at the state level through a cut to hospitals.”

Mayhew also said she is worried about the state’s commitment to helping fund the Medicaid program. Medicaid is administered and funded jointly by the state and federal governments. Mayhew said removing $100 million in general revenue is troubling.

She said just 4% of the general revenue in the current state fiscal year budget was spent on hospital funds.

“We are not driving general revenue (commitments),” she said, adding, “What is the problem we are trying to fix with all the money? There’s no hole; there is no general revenue hole in the state budget,” Mayhew said. “I recognize they are looking over the entire state budget, but I have to raise awareness around the consequences of cuts to hospitals and the care they provide to Medicaid patients.”

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.bizjournals.com/southflorida/news/2022/02/15/medicaid-funding-differ.html

 
 

Posted on

AR- State regulators give OK to Medicaid managed care company once dogged by investigations

MM Curator summary

[MM Curator Summary]: Empower is back in the good graces of the state and now has new private equity backing to help keep solvent.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

Two months ago, things were looking dire for Empower Healthcare Solutions, a managed care organization that serves roughly 20,000 Arkansas Medicaid beneficiaries with developmental disabilities, severe behavioral health disorders and other complex needs.

The attorney general’s office was investigating the company for suspected Medicaid fraud. The state Department of Human Services, which oversees Medicaid in Arkansas, suspended new enrollments to Empower in November due to alleged “misrepresentations” to DHS. And Empower was undergoing an acrimonious corporate divorce with one of its co-owners, Beacon Health Options, which Empower’s lawyers said was trying to “sabotage” Empower on its way out the door.

Now, Empower looks to be in the clear with state regulators – and has found a new financial backer in the form of a Dallas private equity firm.

On Monday, DHS notified Empower CEO Mitch Morris that the company had officially passed a months-long “readiness review” process. DHS officials initiated the review last year out of concern that Empower might not have been prepared to continue serving its members in the wake of its separation from Beacon, one of the nation’s largest behavioral health companies.

In addition to owning a 16.67 percent share of Empower, Beacon played a critical role in its day-to-day operations and provided key administrative services.

An independent consultant who reviewed Empower’s operational capacity in November on behalf of DHS found “significant concerns” about Empower’s transition away from Beacon. “The number and seriousness [of] issues identified without doubt draw into question Empower’s current readiness to carry out required … functions,” he wrote in a Nov. 30 letter to DHS.

However, that consultant ultimately recommended DHS allow Empower to keep operating in 2022, on a conditional basis, while it continued to monitor the company. With the readiness review now complete, Empower is able to resume enrolling Medicaid beneficiaries – and thus bring in more revenue.

Empower is the largest of four so-called Provider-led Arkansas Shared Savings Entities (PASSEs), organizations that contract with DHS to pay for and coordinate care for high-need, high-cost Medicaid beneficiaries. PASSEs must be majority owned by health care providers, but their role is similar to that of insurance companies. Each PASSE receives a fixed monthly sum from DHS for each of its members – the equivalent of a premium. The PASSE is then responsible for paying for care for all its members, which can include costly services like inpatient psychiatric treatment or around-the-clock help for people with disabilities. In 2020, Medicaid paid out almost $1.3 billion to PASSEs for the roughly 50,000 beneficiaries in the system, according to documents provided to a legislative committee in June. About 20,000 of those are Empower members.

“We are happy to achieve full and final approval and look forward to continued collaboration with DHS,” Morris said in an emailed response to questions. He said Empower was “fully staffed and strongly positioned for continued operations.”

The letter DHS sent to Morris says the agency “will continue to monitor Empower and will hold regular meetings with Empower for enhanced monitoring.”

Empower is also free of the Medicaid fraud investigation. On Jan. 4, the attorney general’s office announced it had reached an almost $8 million civil settlement with Empower, which denies wrongdoing.

Morris said the company’s issues with the attorney general’s office “have been fully resolved.”

On Friday, Empower also completed a deal with a new co-owner: Trive Capital, a Dallas-based private equity firm. After gaining approval from the Arkansas Insurance Department – which regulates PASSEs to ensure they are financially solvent – Trive acquired the 16.67 percent share of Empower left behind by Beacon. The separation of Beacon and Empower was completed on Dec. 31, Morris said.

At an Insurance Department hearing Friday afternoon, Tanner Cope, a managing director at Trive, said the two sides had expected to close the deal by the end of the year but were delayed by the attorney general investigation and the DHS readiness review.

Morris said Trive and Empower began discussing the acquisition last summer. He declined to answer a question about the terms of the deal or the amount Trive was initially investing in the Arkansas company.

Asked whether Empower families should be concerned that a private equity firm had acquired a portion of their PASSE, Morris said no. “Empower’s #1 priority is always to provide industry-leading services and support to our members and their families. With these changes, Empower is better positioned to do so,” he wrote.

Trive did not respond to calls or emails on Friday seeking comment.

Trive will join the five Arkansas-based health care organizations that now co-own Empower: Arkansas Community Health Network, a consortium of hospital systems; Statera, a long-term care company; Independent Case Management, a provider of home and community-based services for people with developmental disabilities; The Arkansas Healthcare Alliance, a group of providers for behavioral health and developmental disability services; and, ARcare, a network of clinics and other providers.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.thecabin.net/news/state-regulators-give-ok-to-medicaid-managed-care-company-once-dogged-by-investigations/article_94481979-1031-5d61-b2d6-e2cf5f6afec9.html

Posted on

Vaccine mandate to kick in for first wave of health workers

MM Curator summary

[MM Curator Summary]: The CMS vaccine requirements for healthcare workers began on Thursday.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

A requirement to get vaccinated against COVID-19 kicks in Thursday for millions of health care workers in about half the states

Health care workers in about half the states face a Thursday deadline to get their first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine under a Biden administration mandate that will be rolled out across the rest of the country in the coming weeks.

While the requirement is welcomed by some, others fear it will worsen already serious staff shortages if employees quit rather than comply.

And in some Republican-led states that have taken a stand against vaccine mandates, hospitals and nursing homes could find themselves caught between conflicting state and federal demands.

“We would like to see staff vaccinated. We think that it’s the safest option for residents, which is our biggest concern,” said Marjorie Moore, executive director of VOYCE, a St. Louis County, Missouri, nonprofit that works on behalf of nursing home residents. “But not having staff is also a really big concern, because the neglect that happens as a result of that is severe and very scary.”

The mandate affects a wide swath of the health care industry, covering doctors, nurses, technicians, aides and even volunteers at hospitals, nursing homes, home-health agencies and other providers that participate in the federal Medicare or Medicaid programs.

It comes as many places are stretched thin by the omicron surge, which is putting record numbers of people in the hospital with COVID-19 while sickening many health workers.

Nationwide, about 81% of nursing home staff members already were fully vaccinated as of earlier this month, ranging from a high of 98% in Rhode Island to a low of 67% in Missouri, according to the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The data is unclear about the vaccination levels in hospitals and other health care sites.

The mandate ultimately will cover 10.4 million health care workers at 76,000 facilities.

It is taking effect first in jurisdictions that didn’t challenge the requirement in court. Those include some of the biggest states, with some of the largest populations of senior citizens, among them: California, Florida, New York and Pennsylvania.

“There absolutely have been employee resignations because of vaccination requirements,” said Catherine Barbieri, a Philadelphia attorney at Fox Rothschild who represents health care providers. But “I think it’s relatively small.”

At Wilson Medical Center in rural Neodesha, Kansas, three of the roughly 180 employees are quitting, and several others have sought exemptions from the vaccine mandate, said hospital spokeswoman Janice Reese.

“We are very fortunate that that is all we are losing,” she said, noting that the hospital was not in favor of the mandate. “We didn’t feel like it was our place to actually try to tell a person what they had to do.”

Reese said the vaccine requirement could also make it more difficult for the hospital to fill vacancies.

In Florida, medical centers find themselves caught between dueling federal and state vaccination policies. They could lose federal funding for not adhering to the Biden administration mandate, but could get hit with fines for running afoul of state law.

Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican who has waged a legal campaign against coronavirus mandates, last year signed legislation that forces businesses with vaccine requirements to let workers opt out for medical reasons, religious beliefs, immunity from a previous infection, regular testing or an agreement to wear protective gear. Businesses that fail to comply can be fined $10,000 to $50,000 per violation.

Asked if the state would pursue fines against hospitals that enforce the federal mandate, a spokeswoman for the Florida attorney general said all employee complaints “will be thoroughly reviewed by our office.”

Some states already have their own vaccine requirements for health care workers. In California, for example, they have been required to be fully vaccinated since Sept. 30 and must get a booster b y Feb. 1.

The federal mandate is “better late than never,” said Sal Rosselli, president of the National Union of Healthcare Workers, which represents about 15,000 people in California. “But if it happened sooner, we wouldn’t have gone through the surge, and a lot more people would be alive today.”

The government said it will begin enforcing the first-dose vaccine requirement Feb. 14 in two dozen other states where injunctions were lifted when the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the mandate two weeks ago. The requirement will kick in on Feb. 22 in Texas, which had filed suit separately.

In Missouri, one nursing home served notice this week that it intends to take advantage of a state rule that allows facilities to close for up to two years if they are short-staffed because of the vaccine requirement.

“Obviously we are proponents of vaccines,” said Lisa Cox, a spokeswoman for the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services. But “throughout all of this, we knew that mandating it would be a negative impact really on our health care system … just because of crippling staffing levels.”

Cox identified the facility that was closing as Cedarcrest Manor, in the eastern Missouri city of Washington. She said there are just 42 patients in the 177-bed facility amid the staffing shortages. A woman who answered the phone at the facility took a message but couldn’t immediately comment.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ultimately could cut off funding to places that fail to comply with the mandate. But it plans to begin enforcement with encouragement rather than a heavy hand.

CMS guidance documents indicate it will grant leniency to places that have at least 80% compliance and an improvement plan in place, and it will seek to prod others.

“The overarching goal is to get providers over that finish line and not be cutting off federal dollars,” said MaryBeth Musumeci, a Medicaid expert with the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation.

The states affected on Thursday are: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin, along with the District of Columbia and U.S. territories.

———

Associated Press writers Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar and Anthony Izaguirre contributed to this report.

 
 

Clipped from: https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/vaccine-mandate-kick-wave-health-workers-82492057

Posted on

NJ Watchdog Says State Should Bar Poorly-Rated Nursing Homes From Medicaid

MM Curator summary

[MM Curator Summary]: A recent comptroller report recommends NJ stop payments to nursing homes with consistent poor performance.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 
 

A new report by the New Jersey comptroller recommends tighter Medicaid restrictions on low-performing nursing homes

New Jersey Office of the State Comptroller

A new report by New Jersey’s state comptroller found 15 nursing homes consistently received low ratings by health inspectors, yet still take in about $100 million in Medicaid funding a year.

The state watchdog’s report says poor performers shouldn’t be rewarded if they fail to improve and is recommending progressive measures to force fixes — including barring repeatedly low-ranking facilities from additional public dollars.

“Bottom line: New Jersey taxpayers should not be funding nursing homes that have failed to improve for years, appear unlikely to improve, and put residents in harm’s way,” Acting Comptroller Kevin Walsh said in a statement.

The comptroller’s office analyzed New Jersey’s 339 nursing homes and found 15 of them earned the lowest score on the national grading rubric for long-term care facilities for most quarters in 2020 and 2021. Nursing homes, which have been under close scrutiny amid the COVID pandemic, are evaluated based on federal guidelines set by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on a scale of one to five stars, with one being the lowest.

“These are facilities that year over year performed poorly in some very critical areas, specifically staffing shortages and the amount of nursing hours that are available,” said Laurie Facciarossa Brewer, the state’s long-term care ombudsperson, who consulted with the comptroller’s office on the report.

“It would appear that there doesn’t seem to be an effort by those facilities to improve. It almost seems as if a one-star rating is basically baked in as the cost of doing business,” she said.

State inspectors evaluate nursing homes during unannounced visits and, over several days, grade residents’ quality of care, medication management, nursing home administration and food services. The report found one in 14 nursing homes statewide received a one-star rating in the most recent quarter.

“It’s not the minor stuff that gets you a one-star rating. It’s having multiple deficiencies over time in a wide array of areas,” Brewer said.

They’re making a profit off of the one-star facilities all while taxpayers are paying for one-star care

Acting New Jersey Comptroller Kevin Walsh

The report also found that 14 of the 15 lowest performing nursing homes, or 93%, are run by for-profit companies — statewide, 77% of the facilities are run by for-profits.

“They’re making a profit off of the one-star facilities all while taxpayers are paying for one-star care,” Walsh said.

According to the report, the 15 low performers received more than $300 million in Medicaid funding between 2017-2019. And many have scored poorly since 2013, the data shows.

The comptroller’s office is recommending the state issue a series of restrictions to problem facilities that range from a warning, banning the nursing home from accepting new patients and ultimately, withholding Medicaid dollars. One of the problems the report identified is that the state agency overseeing residential care is different from the agency that distributes the money.

New Jersey’s Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services within the Department of Human Services oversees the state’s Medicaid program but it’s up to the Department of Health to conduct health inspections and evaluate the facilities.

“The agencies need to work together in order to ensure that the residents’ interests and the Medicaid dollars that the state spends are all protected,” Walsh said. He said New Jersey would be the first state to withhold Medicaid dollars from low-rated nursing homes if it decides to accept the recommendation.

Nursing homes have been under increased scrutiny in the last two years after the pandemic sickened and killed more than 8,000 residents and 148 staff, state data show. Brewer said the report’s suggested fixes will complement larger reforms already underway.

Last year, Gov. Phil Murphy signed into law measures to ensure minimum staffing levels, increase wages for direct care staff and mandate that 90% of Medicaid funds be used for direct patient care.

The comptroller’s office has also released a dashboard of the 15 lowest-performing facilities here. Four of the 15 are in Burlington County. If the state considers the report’s recommendations, which could ultimately limit the number of patients at these facilities, it could limit where residents can access long-term care.

“It underscores how very difficult it is when you’re talking about people’s health care,” Brewer said. “Everybody involved has to be really, really mindful of the fact that regardless of how bad the place is, it is where somebody lives.”


 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://gothamist.com/news/nj-watchdog-says-state-should-bar-poorly-rated-nursing-homes-medicaid

Posted on

FL- Florida Government Sued Over Alleged Medicaid Services Contract Breach

MM Curator summary

[MM Curator Summary]: A mental health provider is suing the state for removing it from the Medicaid network.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

On Thursday a case was filed in the Southern District of Florida by Mental Health Network, Inc. (MHN) against Simone Marstiller, in her capacity as Secretary of the State of Florida Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA). The case is regarding breach of contract for the provision of Medicaid services.

The federal Medicaid program provides funding for state Medicaid agencies provided that the agencies agree to administer their programs in accordance with Title XIX of the Social Security Act. Under this act, the complaint says, “a state is only allowed to restrict a provider from participating in the Medicaid program for a reasonable period of time, and prior to imposing any such restriction, the state’s Medicaid agency must meet certain conditions: (1) give the provider notice and an opportunity for a hearing; (2) find that the provider engaged in certain bad conduct: and (3) ensure that the restrictions do not result in denying reasonable access to Medicaid services. Similarly, 42 C.F.R. § 455.422 requires a state to give terminated providers “any appeal rights available under procedures established by State law or regulations.””

MHN is a behavioral health provider which specializes in therapy provided at home, focused on the community of Tavernier. The provider was contracted with AHCA to provide mental health services under the Florida Medicaid State Plan. AHCA has sent a 30 day notice terminating MHN’s participation in the plan, which MHN argues violates the provisions of the federal Medicaid program noted above.

MHN also argues that certain provisions in the Florida State  statutes are directly contrary to the federal law on this subject, including a provision that permits termination of a provider without an appeal.

The plaintiffs are suing for violations of the Federal Medicaid Act, argues that the termination process violates Due Process, and argues that the action was arbitrary and capricious. The plaintiff is represented by Duane Morris, LLP

 
 

Clipped from: https://lawstreetmedia.com/news/health/florida-government-sued-over-alleged-medicaid-services-contract-breach/

Posted on

CO- Colorado is trying to increase Medicaid mental health providers

MM Curator summary

[MM Curator Summary]: Colorado will use $24M in COVID relief funds to grow the MH network.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

Therapists, psychologists and others complain they have to wait months to get approval to take Medicaid patients – at a time when Colorado is trying to increase the number of providers who serve needy patients.

 
 

Woodland Park psychologist Chris Estep spent decades helping foster children and Colorado prison inmates with mental health issues, so when he opened a private practice two years ago, he wanted to take patients on Medicaid across the eastern half of the state. 

He’s still waiting for permission after filing an application 14 months ago. 

Estep, one of the few licensed psychologists who performs mental health and cognitive evaluations for kids all the way up to older adults with dementia, is allowed to take Medicaid patients in just three counties, despite wanting to serve a much broader region that would include Sterling and Pueblo. As a result, he’s had to turn down patients, or take them without getting Medicaid reimbursement.

His frustration with Colorado’s mental health system for the needy – in which mental health professionals have to enroll not just at the state Medicaid department but also contract with regional agencies that serve as middlemen between the state and the providers – is echoed across the industry. 

And the anger over the complicated and slow process is rising among mental health workers at the same time the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, which oversees the Medicaid program, is touting a dramatic boost in providers who are accepting Medicaid patients. Increasing the number of providers has been a priority of Gov. Jared Polis’ administration in order to increase access to mental health care, and there is $24 million in federal coronavirus aid to put toward the effort. 

But therapists, psychologists and others in private practice across the state are asking why – when the goal is to increase their numbers – is it so hard to get permission to join the Medicaid program? And they’re questioning whether the state’s numbers showing a surge in Medicaid providers are accurate.

“There are so many hurdles,” said Estep, who specializes in telehealth and wants to see patients in rural southeastern and northeastern Colorado. “It’s really disheartening. And it doesn’t even have to be this way.”  

The state Medicaid department said it increased the number of mental health providers accepting Medicaid to 8,371 at the end of 2021, up from 6,185 two years ago. This is the number of individual people – not clinics or community mental health centers – who’ve been approved by a Regional Accountable Entity to receive Medicaid reimbursements. It’s a number tallied by an external agency, not the state.

The bump in providers is significant, but not enough to meet the need. During the coronavirus pandemic, Colorado has added about 350,000 people to the Medicaid program – and 30% of them are dealing with anxiety and other mental health issues, according to the department. 

The first step for behavioral health professionals who want to take patients on Medicaid is to apply to the state department. The second is to submit paperwork to one or more of the seven regional entities that provide reimbursement.


Colorado is divided into seven regions run by agencies that contract with the state Medicaid division. Behavioral health providers who want to take patients on Medicaid must enroll first at the state department and then with the regional agencies. (Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing)

It’s relatively easy, mental health professionals say, to enroll as a Medicaid provider with the state – but it typically takes months to get credentials from one of the state’s seven Regional Accountable Entities, called RAEs. 

A second tally by the Medicaid department tracks the number of clinics — from individual private practices to substance abuse clinics to community mental health centers with hundreds of professionals – that have enrolled in the state Medicaid program. This would include providers who enrolled with the Medicaid program but have yet to get approval from a regional agency to begin taking Medicaid patients. 

The various numbers have led to criticism from mental health professionals and their advocates, who are casting doubt on whether the department knows the actual number of behavioral health providers who are currently seeing Medicaid patients. Ahead of this legislative session, they’ve fired off letters to state lawmakers asking for further review of the system. 

State Medicaid officials acknowledge the way they’ve counted Medicaid providers – and their messaging around it – is confusing to the industry. One department memo, for example, included an erroneous calculation about the increase in providers. But the state argues that the numbers are correct. 

“There are a lot of ways to count providers, which is why there is more than one number out there that we have used to count our progress,” said Cristen Bates, population health division director at the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing. 

The state’s behavioral health setup is a so-called “managed-care” system, meaning the Medicaid program contracts with the regional agencies and gives them a lump sum to spend. The contracts mandate that 85% of the funding is spent on patient care, while the other 15% can go toward administrative costs and services such as data-tracking for providers. 

 
 

The regional entities get to decide which mental health providers to allow into the network, and they can reject providers based on complaints of poor service or if the region already has enough of that type of provider. The regional agencies also set reimbursement rates, and can base them on supply and demand. 

In a joint effort, state Medicaid officials and the regional entities are working to increase the number of mental health and substance abuse providers in the government insurance program. The state created a “recruitment tool kit” and the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies is about to send letters to psychologists, addiction professionals and others who aren’t taking Medicaid and ask them to sign up. The regional entities, meanwhile, are offering incentives, such as sign-on bonuses, thanks to the federal coronavirus aid.

“In Colorado we know there is an issue with accessing behavioral health services,” Bates said. “We are hearing clearly from the community that there needs to be more access.” 

But those who’ve waited months for Medicaid credentials say the state needs to put more focus on smoothing out that process. 

It varies by region, but it typically takes two or three months for regional entities to provide those credentials, said Stephanie Farrell, CEO of Left Hand Management, which helps mental health providers with the process as well as billing issues between providers and the regional entities. 

Beacon Health Options, which runs two of the seven regional entities, often takes 10-14 months to credential providers, including Estep, the Woodland Park psychologist, Farrell said. 

“And that is with no mistakes along the way by either the provider or the RAE in a very fragmented credentialing process,” she said. “Those providers cannot really do anything to improve access to care, so they should not be counted as enrolled.”

Beacon Health, which runs regions 2 and 4, did not return requests for comment from The Colorado Sun. 

In one case, Farrell said, a regional entity denied a behavioral health professional who does neuropsychological testing for children on the autism spectrum, as well as counsels their families. The entity said it did not need any more providers of this type in the region, although Farrell said there is a severe shortage of such providers statewide. The decision is now on appeal, two years after the initial application. 


A chart from the Colorado Health Institute’s 2021 Colorado Health Access Survey shows the increase in the percentage of people reporting eight or more days of poor mental health during the previous month. (Provided by the Colorado Health Institute)

Farrell said it’s likely that the state numbers of providers taking Medicaid are inflated because when providers stop taking Medicaid, they often don’t bother with the long, convoluted process of terminating their enrollment with the regional entities. Instead, they just stop taking Medicaid patients, she said. 

In November, multiple mental health providers told The Sun they were dropping Medicaid after a months-long paperwork issue that resulted in one of the regional entities, Colorado Community Health Alliance, ordering providers to return reimbursements they had already received for providing treatment. The health alliance reversed course after reports in The Sun and 9News, and pressure from state policymakers.

For Estep, the delay in his credentialing process has him wondering about all the patients who aren’t getting help. His psychological evaluations, which measure IQ, cognitive function and mental disorders, help people determine a course of treatment. In 2019, he started a part-time private practice, and knew from the start that he wanted to serve the state’s neediest population – particularly because those he worked with while they were behind bars would likely qualify for Medicaid upon release from prison. 

He is allowed to see Medicaid patients from El Paso, Teller and Park counties, but the need for his services extends much farther, Estep said.

“It’s so strange,” he said. “The whole thing is stupid.”

The Colorado Sun has no paywall, meaning readers do not have to pay to access stories. We believe vital information needs to be seen by the people impacted, whether it’s a public health crisis, investigative reporting or keeping lawmakers accountable.

This reporting depends on support from readers like you. For just $5/month, you can invest in an informed community.

 
 

Clipped from: https://coloradosun.com/2022/01/18/mental-health-medicaid-delays/

 
 

Posted on

FL- Applications keep rolling in for Medicaid home and community based grants

MM Curator summary

[ MM Curator Summary]: FL has received 359 applications for providers wanting the additional HCBS money from federal COVID relief funds.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

The Agency for Health Care Administration reports 359 applications have been submitted to the state as of Jan. 6 from home and community-based providers looking to tap into hundreds of millions in additional Medicaid dollars meant to fortify the delivery system that keeps people with developmental and intellectual disabilities out of institutions and in communities.

Nearly 70% of the applications were submitted by providers that want both stipend and retention payments. Sixty-four applications were submitted by providers that want retention payments only and another 30 applications were submitted by providers that are only seeking stipends.

Six applications were submitted by providers wanting to install delayed egress systems.

Twelve applications, AHCA told Florida Politics, were improperly filled out or didn’t have the correct information.

Florida Developmental Disabilities Council
Executive Director Valerie Breen told Florida Politics Friday the association is waiting for AHCA to develop a “Frequently Asked Questions” document that will help providers better understand how to fill out the applications.

 
 

Nevertheless, Breen said, “We are very encouraged that the application process has become available and people are applying.”

The state announced three different funding opportunities for providers that work with people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: $403.7 million for one-time stipends; $266.6 million for bonuses and incentives meant to grow and retain a workforce; and $12 million for delayed egress systems meant to thwart elopement from community group homes.

The Gov. Ron DeSantis administration quietly moved over the summer to take advantage of a 10% bump in federal Medicaid dollars available under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.

President Joe Biden’s administration approved Florida’s proposed request to tap into an additional $1.2 billion in September.

AHCA announced Dec. 17 the opening of a 60-day window for providers to apply for the funds. The state
is accepting applications through Feb. 14.

 
 

It’s not clear how much each individual provider will receive in grants, though egress grants cannot exceed $10,000. AHCA Chief of Staff Cody Farrill told lawmakers in November the agency couldn’t determine individual grant amounts until the state knew the level of interest by providers that want both stipend and retention payments.

Post Views: 700

 
 

Clipped from: https://floridapolitics.com/archives/484396-applications-keep-rolling-in-for-medicaid-home-and-community-based-grants/

 
 

Posted on

NJ/Fraud- $3.6M Medicaid Fraud Allegations Tied To Ex-NJ Nursing Home Owner

MM Curator summary

[ MM Curator Summary]: A NJ nursing home operator is on the run from the law.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

Crime & Safety


Arkansas authorities are looking for Joseph Schwartz, linked to Andover Subacute’s facilities where 17 bodies piled up during the pandemic.

 
 

Jennifer Jean Miller,

Patch Staff

 
 

Posted Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 3:41 pm ET

 
 

Arkansas authorities are looking for Joseph Schwartz, linked to Andover Subacute’s facilities where 17 bodies piled up during the pandemic. (Shutterstock)

ANDOVER TOWNSHIP, NJ — An ex-owner of a Sussex County nursing home where bodies were stacked in a makeshift morgue after COVID swept through it, is being sought in Arkansas for tax evasion and a $3.6 million Medicaid fraud.

That investigation has raised questions in New Jersey about the status of a state investigation into the Andover Subacute facilities, now known as Limecrest Subacute and Rehabilitation Center and Woodland Behavioral and Nursing Center, where Joseph Schwartz, who owns Skyline nursing homes, is linked to the ownership.

NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt aired a segment in November about what happened at the Andover Subacute facilities during the pandemic below, interviewing a former employee who spoke for the first time about what happened on Easter weekend in April 2020, when the morgue became so packed, one body was placed in a storage shed.

Find out what’s happening in Hopatcong-Sparta with free, real-time updates from Patch.

RELATED: Watch NJ Nursing Home Ex-Employee Talk About ‘Makeshift Morgue’

In the Lester Holt broadcast, interviewer Stephanie Gosk spoke about the outcome of the federal inspections at Andover Subacute after the 2020 incident, which later changed its name, referring back to NBC News’ own 2019 investigation into Schwartz’s company.

Find out what’s happening in Hopatcong-Sparta with free, real-time updates from Patch.

Schwartz’s Skyline reportedly once had a stake in the Andover facilities, with his son Louis still one of the owners, NBC News reported in its exposé below:

 
 

The Allegations From Arkansas

Arkansas’ Attorney General Leslie Rutledge said authorities are looking for Schwartz after a 44-month investigation into his company Skyline nursing homes, who Rutledge said received $3.6 million in 2018 from overbilled Medicaid payments for eight facilities that he owns in Arkansas.

According to a recent news release from Rutledge’s office, Schwartz’s company ballooned its billings to more than $6.2 million by filing bogus cost reports, statements and other documents, which resulted in an overpayment to his company of more than $3.6 million from Arkansas’ Medicaid Program.

Rutledge said Schwartz was also charged with attempting to evade taxes by taking out over $2 million in income taxes from his Arkansas employees’ paychecks between July 2017 and March 2018, without forwarding those tax withholdings to the State of Arkansas.

He additionally took in “tens of millions of dollars in gross income,” from his facilities in 2018 and 2019, for which he never filed tax returns, according to Rutledge.

“These charges come after a 44-month-long investigation into Skyline’s wrongdoings, and I will not sit idly by while anyone defrauds the State and Federal government out of millions of dollars to line their own pockets,” Rutledge said. “It’s important for Arkansans to know if they suspect Medicaid fraud, they should immediately contact my office.”

Her office referred the case to the Attorney General’s Office by the Office of Medicaid Inspector General, following a joint investigation with the HHS OIG- Office of Investigation, Nebraska Medicaid Fraud and Patient Abuse Unit, Kansas MFCU, Maryland MFCU and South Dakota MFCU.

Local Response To Allegations Against Schwartz

Members of Sussex County’s Board of County Commissioners responded to the news about the Arkansas warrant for Schwartz on Wednesday, stating they plan to draft a letter to New Jersey’s Acting Attorney General Andrew J. Bruck for an update on the state’s investigation into Andover Subacute, which the commissioners plan to present at their next public meeting.

According to a news release from the commissioners, they say that Governor Phil Murphy’s administration continues to stonewall Open Public Records Act requests that Sussex County’s attorney first submitted in May 2020.

RELATED: Still No Answers In Case Of NJ ‘Makeshift Morgue’ Nursing Home

The County Commissioners additionally say that “a yearlong investigation by the New Jersey Attorney General into Andover Subacute and other nursing homes has produced no news.”

A special public question that was on Sussex County ballots in the Nov. 2 General election, overwhelmingly had more than 34,000 votes or 82 percent of voters choosing “yes” for a deeper probe into the COVID-19 deaths in New Jersey’s nursing home, as well as further release of information related to New Jersey’s handling of nursing homes during the pandemic.

RELATED: Sussex Co. Ballot Question Calls For COVID-19 Nursing Home Probe

The commissioners say that the news about Schwartz thrusts into the spotlight the “poor management of the nursing homes in the run-up to Governor Phil Murphy’s Executive Order 103 that forced many substandard, long-term care facilities to accept COVID patients.”

“The fact that state officials were responsible for the licensing and oversight of these facilities only heightens the need for transparency and full disclosure,” wrote Samantha Gabriele, a spokesperson on behalf of the commissioners.

“The County Commissioners have cooperated fully with the state investigation, including allowing interviewing of staff members, all emails and correspondences; and emails to the state Health Department in response to what was happening at the nursing home,” said Commissioner Herb Yardley.

He called the cooperation from the state “one-sided,” indicating that rather than having an investigation conducted by the Attorney General, who Murphy appointed, it should be performed by special counsel.

“It’s been more than a year and we still have not heard anything about this investigation or how the policies, decisions and oversight directed at our nursing homes resulted in tragedy,” Commissioner Anthony Fasano said. “Transparency and accountability are so desperately needed and so noticeably missing.”

Questions or comments about this story? Have a local news tip? Contact me at: jennifer.miller@patch.com.

Clipped from: https://patch.com/new-jersey/hopatcong-sparta/3-6m-medicaid-fraud-allegations-tied-ex-nj-nursing-home-owner

Posted on

NV/HCBS- Nevada leveraging federal funds for home care workers

MM Curator summary

[ MM Curator Summary]: Home care workers can get a one-time $500 payment.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

Nevada Medicaid is leveraging an opportunity through the federal American Rescue Plan Act to offer $500 supplemental payments to Medicaid home care workers who have been on the front lines of the pandemic.

“Nevada is indebted to this critical workforce that quietly helps people stay in their homes every day,” said Governor Steve Sisolak. “Home care workers left their own homes and cared for our elderly and Nevadans with disabilities so that they didn’t have to leave home. This opportunity is one way to give back.”

Home care workers were first informed of this opportunity late last year, and the application period is open until January 14.

The $500 supplemental payment is available to home care workers who have maintained their employment with an agency since Nov. 1, 2021. Medicaid providers offering home care services may apply on behalf of employees until January 14, 2022. Participation is voluntary. The application and qualifications can be found at https://dhcfp.nv.gov/Pgms/LTSS/AmericanRescuePlan/

Nevada has more than 13,000 home care workers, predominately women and disproportionately minorities, who help older Nevadans and persons with physical or intellectual disabilities with daily tasks to remain independent in their homes.

Nevada Medicaid offers free or low-cost health insurance for working Nevadans, people who have lost their jobs or have become too sick to work. The program supports low-income families, children, seniors, and people with disabilities and offers financial protection against bankruptcy for families who are struck by unexpected illness. Nevada Medicaid makes health care possible in many urban and rural communities. Sign up today for Nevada Medicaid email alerts. Apply for Nevada Medicaid at Access Nevada or call 1-800-992-0900. If you are not eligible for Medicaid, subsidies and tax credits for health insurance costs are offered through NevadaHealthLink.com (1-800-547-2927).

###

 
 

Clipped from: https://gov.nv.gov/News/Press/2022/Nevada_leveraging_federal_funds_for_home_care_workers/

Posted on

CMS Says Children’s COVID-19 Vaccine Counseling Visits Covered by Medicaid

 
 

 
 

MM Curator summary

[ MM Curator Summary]: CMS will now require COVID vaccination counseling as part of the EPSDT program.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

On Dec. 2, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced that Medicaid programs must cover COVID-19 vaccine counseling visits provided to children as part of the Medicaid Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment (EPSDT) benefit. This action is part of the Biden-Harris administration’s winter plan to respond to COVID-19 amid the emergence of a new variant of concern, omicron.

COVID-19 vaccine counseling visits will fall under COVID-19 vaccine administration, and as such will be federally matched at 100% under the American Rescue Plan Act. The law was enacted in March 2021 and provides a 100% federal match for COVID-19 vaccines and vaccine administration during the public health emergency and for one year after the end of the emergency. Read more about the American Rescue Plan Act’s health-related provisions in this previous blog post.

Medicaid programs will also be required to cover stand-alone vaccine counseling visits, federally matched at the regular match rate, for all pediatric vaccines under the EPSDT benefit.

 
 

Clipped from: https://achi.net/newsroom/cms-says-childrens-covid-19-vaccine-counseling-visits-covered-by-medicaid/