Category: MM Curator

Posted on by

REFORM- More than 4 in 5 pregnancy-related deaths are preventable in the US, and mental health is the leading cause

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: More details on what is really going on with pregnancy related death: There are a total of 700 in the US each year, 13% of them happen during childbirth- 65% occur in the year after childbirth and most of them have to do with substance abuse/ suicide.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://theconversation.com/more-than-4-in-5-pregnancy-related-deaths-are-preventable-in-the-us-and-mental-health-is-the-leading-cause-193909

Rachel Diamond, Adler University

Author

 
 

Rachel Diamond

Clinical Training DIrector and Assistant Professor of Couple and Family Therapy, Adler University

Disclosure statement

Rachel Diamond does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Partners

Adler University provides funding as a member of The Conversation US.

View all partners

 
 

We believe in the free flow of information
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence.

 
 

According to the CDC’s latest numbers, 65% of pregancy-related deaths occur in the first year following childbirth. Petri Oeschger/Moment via Getty Images

Preventable failures in U.S. maternal health care result in far too many pregnancy-related deaths. Each year, approximately 700 parents die from pregnancy and childbirth complications. As such, the U.S. maternal mortality rate is more than double that of most other developed countries.

The Department of Health and Human Services declared maternal deaths a public health crisis in December 2020. Such calls to action by the U.S. Surgeon General are reserved for only the most serious of public health crises.

In October 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released new data gathered between 2017 and 2019 that further paints an alarming picture of maternal health in the U.S. The report concluded that a staggering 84% of pregnancy-related deaths are preventable.

However, these numbers don’t even reflect how widespread this problem could be. At present, only 39 states have dedicated committees in place to review maternal deaths and determine whether they were preventable; of those, 36 states were included in the latest CDC data.

I am a therapist and scholar specializing in mental health during the perinatal period, the time during pregnancy and postpartum. Research has long demonstrated significant mental health risks associated with pregnancy, childbirth and the year following childbirth. The CDC’s report now makes it clear that mental health conditions are an important factor in many of these preventable deaths.

A closer look at the numbers

The staggering number of preventable maternal deaths – 84% – from the CDC’s most recent report represents a 27% increase from the agency’s previous report, from 2008 to 2017. Of these pregnancy-related deaths, 22% occur during pregnancy, 13% during childbirth and 65% during the year following childbirth.

This raises the obvious question: Why are so many preventable pregnancy-related deaths occurring in the U.S., and why is the number rising?

For a pregnancy-related death to be categorized as preventable, a maternal mortality review committee must conclude there was some chance the death could have been avoided by at least one reasonable change related to the patient, community, provider, facility or systems of care.

The most commonly identified factors in these preventable deaths have been those directly related to the patient or their support networks, followed next by providers and systems of care. While patient factors may be most frequently identified, they are often dependent on providers and systems of care.

Take, for instance, the example of a new mother dying by suicide from a mental health condition, such as depression. Patient factors could include her lack of awareness about the warning signs of clinical depression, which she may have mistaken for difficulties with the transition to parenthood and perceived personal failures as a new parent.

As is often the case, these factors would have directly related to the inaction of health care providers, such as a failure to screen for mental health concerns, delays in diagnosis and ineffective treatment. This type of breakdown – which is common – would have been made worse by poor coordination of care between providers across the health care system.

This example illustrates the complexities of the failures and preventable outcomes in the maternal health care system.

The U.S. has a far higher rate of pregnancy-related deaths than other developed nations.

The role of mental health

In the CDC’s latest report, mental health conditions are the overall most frequent cause of pregnancy-related death. Approximately 23% of deaths are attributed to suicide, substance use disorder or are otherwise associated with a mental health condition. The next two leading causes are hemorrhage and cardiac conditions, which combined contribute to only slightly more deaths than mental health conditions, at about 14 and 13%, respectively.

Research has long shown that 1 in 5 women suffer from mental health conditions during pregnancy and the postpartum period, and that this is also a time of increased risk for suicide. Yet, mental illness – namely, depression – is the most underdiagnosed obstetric complication in America. Despite some promising reductions in U.S. suicide rates in the general population over the last decade, maternal suicide has tripled during this same time period.

As it relates to maternal substance use, this issue is also worsening. In recent years, almost all deaths from drug overdose during pregnancy and the postpartum period involved opioids. A review from 2007 to 2016 found that pregnancy-related deaths involving opioids more than doubled.

Many of these issues stem from the fact that up to 80% of women with maternal mental health concerns are undiagnosed or untreated.

Barriers to care

In 2021, the first national data set of its kind showed that less than 20% of prenatal and postpartum patients were screened for depression. Only half of those who screened positive received follow-up care.

Research has long demonstrated widespread barriers and gaps in maternal mental health care. Many health care providers do not screen for mental health concerns because they do not know where to refer a patient or how to treat the condition. In addition, only about 40% of new mothers even attend their postpartum visit to have the opportunity for detection. Non-attendance is more common among higher-risk populations of postpartum women, such as those who are socially and economically vulnerable and whose births are covered by Medicaid.

Medicaid covers around 4 in 10 births. Through Medicaid benefits, pregnant women are covered for care related to pregnancy, birth and associated complications, but only up to 60 days postpartum. Not until 2021 did the American Rescue Plan Act begin extending Medicaid coverage up to one year postpartum.

But as of November 2022, only 27 states have adopted the Medicaid extension. In the other states, new mothers lose postpartum coverage after just 60 days. This matters a great deal because low-income mothers are at a greater risk for postpartum depression, with reported rates as high as 40% to 60%.

In addition, the recent CDC report showed that 30% of preventable pregnancy-related deaths happened between 43 and 365 days postpartum – which is also the time frame suicide most commonly occurs. Continued Medicaid expansion would reduce the number of uninsured new parents and rates of maternal mortality.

Another challenging barrier to addressing maternal mental health is the criminalization of substance use during pregnancy. If seeking care exposes a pregnant person to the possibility of criminal or civil pentalties – including incarceration, involvement with child protective services and the prospect of separation from their baby – it will naturally dissuade them from seeking treatment.

At this time, 24 states consider substance use during pregnancy to be child abuse, and 25 states require health care professionals to report suspected prenatal drug use. Likewise, there are also tremendous barriers in the postpartum period for mothers seeking substance use treatment, due in part to the lack of family-centered options.

With all these barriers, many pregnant and new mothers may make the difficult decision to not engage in treatment during a critical window for intervention.

Looking ahead

While the information described above already paints a dire picture, the CDC data was collected prior to two major events: the COVID-19 pandemic and the fall of Roe v. Wade, which overturned nearly 50 years of abortion rights. Both of these events have exacerbated existing cracks in the health care system and, subsequently, worsened the maternal health in the U.S.

In my view, without radical changes to maternal health care in the U.S., starting with how mental health is treated throughout pregnancy and postpartum, it’s likely parents will continue to die from causes that could otherwise be prevented.

Posted on by

FWA (WV)- State Medicaid Fraud Office Expansion To Include CHIP Fraud Investigations

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: After the state took the fraud investigation team away from the health agency and gave it to the AG, recoveries grew 286%.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.wvpublic.org/government/2022-11-29/state-medicaid-fraud-office-expansion-to-include-chip-fraud-investigations

 
 

The Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit is expanding to include investigations of Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) fraud across the state.

CHIP offers health insurance to children whose families earn too much money for Medicaid.

Attorney General Patrick Morrisey said this expansion puts West Virginia’s fraud unit more in line with the majority of states and that investigating claims of CHIP fraud will save taxpayers more money.

“I just view that if you have the ability to save an extra dollar more with really not much effort, why wouldn’t you do that for the taxpayers and for the beneficiaries of the program?” Morrisey said.

The expansion was announced during a Tuesday press conference scheduled by Morrisey, who touted the successes of the fraud control unit under his office over the past three years. During that time the unit was expanded from 12 individuals to 21 with the average amount of civil recoveries from fraud per year climbing 268 percent.

Investigations of Medicaid fraud were previously housed under the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources before being placed under the jurisdiction of the Attorney General’s office in 2019.

Posted on by

FWA- Western suburbs OB-GYN pleads guilty to Medicaid fraud

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Monique Brotman was convicted of stealing $58k from Medicaid, but she says things are not as they seem and she plead down to avoid jail time. Amount you spent on this (if you pay taxes)- $58,747.57.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/breaking/ct-obgyn-river-forest-medicaid-fraud-20221130-lhg2fzy5trenrberezf4npuxje-story.html

A suburban OB-GYN alleged to have fraudulently charged Illinois’ Medicaid program pleaded guilty Tuesday in Cook County Circuit Court, Attorney General Kwame Raoul’s office said.

Dr. Monique Brotman, 52, of River Forest, billed Medicaid $58,747.57 for ultrasounds and other procedures that were not provided, alleged the attorney general’s office, which prosecuted the case. The alleged false charges occurred between December 2008 and February 2015, Raoul’s office wrote in a news release.

“Thousands of Illinois residents rely on Medicaid for their health care. Defrauding the people of Illinois by misusing needed Medicaid resources will not be tolerated,” Raoul wrote.

The OB-GYN was ordered to pay full restitution upfront and will be excluded from the Medicaid and Medicare programs for at least five years. She was also sentenced to five days of community service, the news release said.

Brotman told the Tribune she’s operated a private practice in the western suburbs since 2008, part of a decadeslong career.

“And I would like to do so again,” Brotman said. She has been told that her medical license will be automatically suspended for the term of her five-year probation, a temporary stoppage of her practice that she called “heartbreaking.”

“Things are not what they seem,” Brotman said, adding that she had doubts about some of the alleged fraudulent charges but decided to plead guilty to avoid facing potential jail time.

“I think that it was very heavy-handed, and I don’t think that the punishment mirrors the offense,” she said. “This is something that occurred almost a decade ago in a very dark time in my life, and that should be taken into account.”

Brotman’s office hasn’t accepted Medicare or Medicaid since the investigation into her office began in 2015, she said. She said she believes the pause should have been counted as time served.

The attorney general’s statement credited the Illinois State Police for investigating the fraud allegations and said Assistant Attorney General Rob Sparano handled the case.

Posted on by

FWA- Maryland Man Pleads Guilty to Defrauding Medicaid of More than $700,000 in Scheme Involving Personal Care Services

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Joseph Tamjong of D.C. billed for 3,400 hours of personal care services while he was travelling internationally, including 156 times he claimed to work 24 hours in a 1-day period- Amount you spent on this (if you pay taxes)- $733,405.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/maryland-man-pleads-guilty-defrauding-medicaid-more-700000-scheme-involving-personal-care

Defendant is 12th Individual to Plead Guilty Since August 2018

            WASHINGTON – Joseph Tamjong, 51, of Lanham, Maryland, pleaded guilty today to defrauding the D.C. Medicaid program out of $733,405. 

            The announcement was made by U.S. Attorney Matthew M. Graves, Wayne A. Jacobs, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Washington Field Office’s Criminal Division, Maureen R. Dixon, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General for the region that includes Washington, D.C., and Daniel W. Lucas, Inspector General for the District of Columbia.

            Tamjong pleaded guilty in the U.S. District  Court for the District of Columbia to health care fraud, which carries a statutory maximum penalty of 10 years in prison. Under federal sentencing guidelines, Tamjong faces a likely recommended sentence of between 27 and 33 months in prison. He has agreed to pay $733,405 in restitution and $396,155 in a forfeiture money judgment. The Honorable Christopher R. Cooper, who accepted Tamjong’s guilty plea, scheduled sentencing for March 7, 2023.

            In court documents, Tamjong admitted that between December 2014 and February 2022, he was employed as a Personal Care Aide and/or a Participant-Directed Worker to provide personal care aide services to residents of the District of Columbia who needed assistance performing activities of daily living, such as getting in and out of bed, bathing, dressing, and eating. Tamjong admitted that he submitted false timesheets that claimed he provided these personal care services when in fact he did not.

            As part of his scheme, he even caused Medicaid to be billed for approximately 3,400 hours of services that he purportedly provided when he actually was traveling internationally. On 156 separate occasions, he also caused Medicaid to be billed for 24 hours of services that he allegedly provided in one day.

            The FBI, the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General, the District of Columbia’s Office of the Inspector General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office are committed to investigating and prosecuting individuals who defraud the D.C. Medicaid program.

            Tamjong is the twelfth former personal care aide since August 2018 to plead guilty to defrauding Medicaid in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Six of those aides were sentenced to 13 months in prison; a seventh and eighth were sentenced respectively to 15 months and 10 months.

            The government urges the public to provide tips and assistance to stop health care fraud. If you have information about individuals committing health care fraud, please call the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General hotline at (800) HHSTIPS [(800) 447-8477] or the D.C. Office of the Inspector General at (800) 724-TIPS [(800) 274-8477].

            This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Kondi Kleinman with assistance from Paralegal Specialist Michon Tart.

Posted on by

FWA- Group Home Owners Sentenced in $1 Million Medicare Fraud Scheme

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Lindell King and Yndera Diggs got kickbacks from Behavioral Medicine of Houston (BMH) to send patients their way. Amount you paid (if you pay taxes)- $538k to Lindell and Ynedra; $1M to BMH for the resulting services they billed for the patients they bought via kickbacks.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/group-home-owners-sentenced-1-million-medicare-fraud-scheme

A Texas married couple was sentenced today for a $1 million Medicare fraud scheme, including violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute.

Lindell King, 53, of Missouri City, was sentenced to 60 months in prison. Ynedra Diggs, 45, also of Missouri City, was sentenced to 70 months in prison. King and Diggs were also ordered to pay $537,992.55 in restitution.

On April 4, King and Diggs were convicted after trial in the Southern District of Texas of conspiracy to defraud the United States and to pay and receive health care kickbacks, and multiple substantive violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute.

According to court documents and evidence presented at trial, both Diggs and King were patient recruiters who owned and operated group homes in which Medicare beneficiaries lived. In exchange for sending their group home residents to the Behavioral Medicine of Houston (BMH), a community mental health center that purported to provide partial hospitalization services, BMH paid Diggs, King, and other patient recruiters illegal kickbacks in cash and by check, often concealed as payment for “transportation” or other sham services. During the course of the conspiracy, BMH fraudulently billed approximately $1 million to Medicare in claims related to patients it received in exchange for the kickbacks paid to Diggs and King.

Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Polite, Jr. of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division; U.S. Attorney Jennifer B. Lowery for the Southern District of Texas; Acting Special Agent in Charge Jason Meadows of the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General’s (HHS-OIG) Dallas Region; Assistant Director Luis Quesada of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division; Special Agent in Charge James H. Smith III of the FBI Houston Field Office; and Chief William Marlowe of the Texas Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU) made the announcement.

The HHS-OIG, FBI, and MFCU investigated the case.

Trial Attorney Monica Cooper and Acting Assistant Chief Brynn Schiess of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section are prosecuting the case.

The Fraud Section leads the Criminal Division’s efforts to combat health care fraud through the Health Care Fraud Strike Force Program. Since March 2007, this program, comprised of 15 strike forces operating in 24 federal districts, has charged more than 4,200 defendants who collectively have billed the Medicare program for more than $19 billion. In addition, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, working in conjunction with the Office of the Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services, are taking steps to hold providers accountable for their involvement in health care fraud schemes. More information can be found at https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/health-care-fraud-unit.

Posted on by

TECH- Google rolls out search features for Medicaid, Medicare patients

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Google seeks to replace your local Medicaid eligibility state employee.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/health-tech/google-rolls-out-search-features-aim-make-it-easier-sign-medicaid-medicare

 
 

LAS VEGAS—When many people are looking to enroll in health benefits, they turn to Google as a source of key information on eligibility, the application process and in-network providers.

In this spirit, the Google Search team has quietly rolled out multiple features for its search engine that aim to make it easier for users to access key information about obtaining Medicaid and Medicare benefits, as well as which doctors locally accept those types of coverage.


(Google)

If someone submits a search query for Medicaid in their state, for example, the top of the results will populate with multiple buttons that direct them to key results on eligibility requirements, how to apply and where they can log in to their accounts. Searching for Medicare generates similar buttons, as well as an option to pull up news about the program.

Hema Budaraju, senior director of product for health and social impact at Google Search, told Fierce Healthcare that access to information is a social determinant of health, and addressing that challenge is a key part of how the tech giant is thinking about equity.

“It’s equity by design in the product,” Budaraju said in an interview at the HLTH conference, “and we’re very proud of being part of the journey.”

Helping people secure coverage is one piece, better enabling them to use it effectively is another. Another recent addition to Google’s search allows people to seek out local physicians and the results will include if those doctors accept Medicare and Medicaid.

When a user clicks into a specific physician, they can also further investigate their options using a “check insurance info” option that allows them to filter by specific Medicare and Medicaid carriers and plans.

Budaraju said the goal was to offer these details in “an easily consumable manner” that enables them to make “timely” decisions about their care and coverage. She added that these tools are not limited to Medicare and Medicaid, and that Google has rolled out similar functionality for the Children’s Health Insurance Program, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and electronic benefit transfer (EBT) programs as well.

The journey in accessing data on these social programs is “nonlinear,” Budaraju said, and often requires people to sift through multiple webpages and sites to find the details they need. That’s why Google saw an opportunity to streamline the experience.

She said the Search team also sees an opportunity to use this framework as a baseline for other scenarios, such as economic security, crisis response or in extreme weather. The focus on equity and easing the user experience is replicable in other areas, she said.

“There is a beauty to understanding, ‘What is the journey?'” Budaraju said.

Posted on by

MH/RX- Mental health declines as Medicaid funds record psychotropic drug use

 
 

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: The author wants to be ticked about expansion but also wants to benefit from the idea that lockdowns caused a surge in MH needs. Besides all that we get some decent data on MH drug trends in Idaho.

Clipped from: https://idahofreedom.org/mental-health-declines-as-medicaid-funds-record-psychotropic-drug-use/

 
 

 
 

Taxpayer-subsidized government healthcare is not making people healthier. 

New data shows that the use of psychotropic drugs among Medicaid beneficiaries is projected to reach an all-time high for the third consecutive year. With one in every five Medicaid prescriptions in Idaho written for these drugs, there exists a serious problem with mental health throughout the Gem State.

Psychotropic drugs are generally used to treat mental health conditions like anxiety, depression and mood disorders. In 2016, there were just under 400,000 claims for such medications. Since then, the use of these drugs has increased significantly, with claims growing 86% as of 2021.  Estimates for 2022 say that Idaho Medicaid will spend $91 million to cover just short of one million claims for psychotropics by the end of the year.


Figure 1

Medicaid expansion and the COVID-19 pandemic both started in early 2020, as did the steep increase in psychotropic use. In the previous decade, spending on psychotropic medications declined by 5% per year and the number of prescriptions declined by 1% per year, when adjusted for inflation and Medicaid enrollment. Since 2020, however, this decline suddenly became a sharp annualized increase of 6% in prescriptions and 15% in spending (see Figure 2). 


Figure 2

Medicaid expansion added to the number of people who could receive benefits. But that change alone does not explain the rapid increase in prescriptions and prescription expenses. Demographic changes played a key role.

The effects of the pandemic – exacerbated by harsh government policies, including Gov. Brad Little’s statewide lockdowns – created a surge of Idahoans applying for Medicaid. For adults under 40 and those in their 60s, lockdown policies created isolation, unemployment, and economic hardship, all of which harmed their mental health significantly more than was the case for all other age groups. This likely generated a demographic shift necessary, among both existing and new Medicaid enrollees, that accounts for the sudden rise in psychotropic drug use. Despite the state’s relatively quick economic recovery touted by the governor, these concerning trends remain and are worsening.

There is cause for skepticism about the efficacy of prescribing psychotropic drugs to treat mental health conditions. One groundbreaking study asserts that the foundational theory supporting antidepressants – the chemical imbalance theory – is incorrect. Naturally, this research also calls into question whether antidepressants are effective forms of treatment. This theory has also been the basis of hesitancy for doctors and patients to stop antidepressant treatments, leading to lifelong use by people who would otherwise be able to seek better alternatives.

Despite doubts about the efficacy of some psychotropics, like antidepressants, these types of drugs are still commonly overprescribed. A national study notes that three out of every five visits where a new psychotropic drug was prescribed to a patient had no corresponding psychiatric diagnosis. Not only is this practice potentially detrimental to patient health, but the same study links this over-prescription to rising costs within the Medicaid system.

This tendency to overprescribe psychotropic drugs also made it common for patients to be taking more than one of these medications at the same time. Disturbingly, patients on Medicaid are significantly more likely to be taking multiple psychotropic drugs, despite this being an ill-advised practice that could have harmful effects on patients. This is especially concerning for the case in Idaho, as the state ranks among those with the highest incidence of this practice.

What is happening within the Medicaid system is an example of how government control negatively impacts people’s lives. The big government policies that dictated how we weathered the pandemic destroyed the livelihoods of many Idahoans and had long-term negative effects on their health and freedom. 

The entrapment of patients in chronic therapies is a common convention of modern medicine. Guaranteeing that patients continue their treatments without the hurdle of paying for them – as the Medicaid system does so well – is good for business among medical interest groups. Some healthcare professionals are beginning to notice these practices, resulting in the increasing popularity of osteopathic physicians versus their allopathic counterparts – that is, DOs rather than MDs. Scholars are finding that not only are mental health conditions not treated well with medications, but lifestyle plays a greater role in mental health than originally thought, and the medical community is beginning to take note.

Patients should be weary of those claiming to advocate for their well-being, only to call for bigger government and more social programs. Like subsidies and bailouts to support companies that are failing due to their bad business models, Medicaid is subsidizing the use of healthcare treatments and practices that may not be best for patients. However, the consequences of doing so are more severe than traditional business bailouts and the result is a worse healthcare system for everyone.

Posted on by

MH (LA)- Mental health providers decry ‘mind-numbing’ prior authorization burdens as Senate debates reforms

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Prior auth requirements in LA are causing extreme delays, especially for MH services.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/providers/mental-health-providers-decry-mind-numbing-prior-authorization-burdens-senate-debates

 
 

Several mental health providers told a key Senate panel that prior authorization requests are getting in the way of patient care, as the chamber debates a key reform package. 

A subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) held a hearing Wednesday on youth mental health. Some of the providers complained of long wait times and high administrative costs for prior authorization, a cost management tool employed by insurers that requires approval before physicians can administer certain services or prescribe drugs.

“It is mind-numbing,” said Ashley Weiss, director of medical student education in psychiatry for Tulane University and one of the panel’s witnesses. “It will take weeks sometimes getting prior authorization for community-based mental health services.”

A particular concern is getting responses for Medicaid mental health claims. Weiss said that in Louisiana there are five companies that provide managed care for Medicaid and each has a different prior authorization system. 

“The amount of administrative support you need to get these done is astronomical,” she said. 

There does need to be some authorization system in place and a process for helping youths understand the medications that they are prescribed, but the wait for approval of such requests is burdensome, said Sharon Hoover, professor of psychiatry and co-director of the National Center for School Mental Health with the University of Maryland.

“The wait times for getting into mental healthcare … for families can be really impossible to navigate,” she said.

The House did unanimously pass the Improving Seniors Timely Access to Care Act earlier this year, which would require all Medicare Advantage plans to install electronic prior authorization systems to speed up the gap between requests and approvals. It would also set up a system to get faster approvals for items and services that routinely get the green light. 

While the legislation passed the House back in September without any opposition, it remains unclear if the Senate will clear it before the end of the year. 

Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., endorsed the legislation during the panel hearing, calling prior authorization “the number one physician administrative concern in America.”

Marshall, an obstetrician, said that his nurses sometimes deal with multiple fax requests from insurers as opposed to e-mails. While the legislation only focuses on Medicare, Marshall pledged to “go after [the Children’s Health Insurance Program] and Medicaid” in future packages.

Posted on by

MCOs- UnitedHealth Group expects to bring in nearly $360B in revenue for 2023

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Its good to be king.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payers/unitedhealth-group-expects-bring-nearly-360b-revenue-2023

 
 

UnitedHealth Group expects double-digit revenue growth in 2023, with the company’s top line protected to come in between $357 billion and $360 billion next year, the company announced Tuesday.

The healthcare giant also expects a profit of between $21.7 billion and $22.3 billion and net earnings of $23.15 to $23.65 per share, according to materials (PDF) released as part of the company’s investor conference. Cash flows from operations are expected to range from $27 billion to $28 billion.

UnitedHealth Group expects adjusted net earnings between $24.40 to $24.90 per share.

The company’s top line for 2022 is now expected to be approximately $324 billion. Net earnings are expected to be $20.85 to $21.05 per share and adjusted net earnings are expected to be $21.85 to $22.05 per share, as announced in the third-quarter earnings release.  

Net earnings attributable to shareholders are expected to hit about $20 billion this year.

UnitedHealth is already one of the most profitable health insurers, and its strong growth in 2023 will largely be driven by the company’s Optum division for healthcare services. 

Revenue at Optum is expected to grow next year by 15% to 17%, led by its outpatient medical centers business and its healthcare data and consulting services unit. Optum’s revenue is expected to grow from $183 billion in 2022 to between $212 billion and $214 billion next year.

UnitedHealthcare’s health insurance division serves 51 million people worldwide, according to the company. Health insurance enrollment in the U.S. is expected to grow by more than 2%, covering more than 47 million people.

UnitedHealth reported its third-quarter earnings in mid-October, where it posted $5.3 billion in profit and $80.9 billion in revenue for the quarter. It was the most profitable major national payer for the third straight quarter.

Through the first nine months of the year, UnitedHealth Group has reported $15.35 billion in profit and $241.4 billion in revenue.

In early October, UnitedHealth Group completed its controversial acquisition of Change Healthcare just weeks after securing a federal court win allowing the merger to go forward.

The two companies first announced plans to merge in January 2021.

In mid-September, the merger beat a challenge from the Department of Justice (DOJ) on antitrust grounds, and a federal judge gave the companies the go-ahead to close pending the divestiture of Change’s ClaimsXten business.

But the feds aren’t going down without a fight and want another shot at blocking the acquisition.

The DOJ issued a notice of appeal this month, saying it would take the case to D.C. circuit court. In the brief filing, the DOJ added that New York and Minnesota would also join the legal challenge. UnitedHealth is based in Minnetonka, Minnesota, a suburb of the Twin Cities.

Posted on by

MCOs- Medicaid managed care merger starts Jan. 1 in Virginia

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: VA is pulling together their 2 different Medicaid managed care programs.

 
 

Clipped from: https://dailyprogress.com/news/state-and-regional/medicaid-managed-care-merger-starts-jan-1-in-virginia/article_72f8c64c-d60a-5c26-a520-2f5c53469c9e.html

Virginia health care providers want the next multi-billion-dollar, Medicaid managed care contract to tackle longstanding complaints about insurers’ practices – but the state and insurers say the imminent merger of the state’s two managed care programs could fix many of those.

On Jan. 1, the state will merge the two programs, which cover virtually all the 1.8 million Virginians whose health care is paid for by the $18.7 billion, joint federal-state system.

It contracts with six insurers, formally called “managed care organizations” or MCOs, to run the plans the two programs offer Medicaid recipients.

But what insurers’ guidelines for their coverage can differ depending on which program their plans come under, even if the insurers have plans for both programs, said Doug Gray, executive director of the Virginia Association of Health Plans.

“I think that’s where a lot of confusion comes up,” he said.

Providers sometimes think they’re dealing with one program when their patients are actually in the other, he said.

On Jan. 1, the new “Cardinal Care” will merge the Medallion 4 managed care plans that serves children, pregnant women and adults – that last category has grown with Medicaid expansion, since in years past only very low income parents qualified – and the Commonwealth Coordinated Care Plus plans that serve older adults who also are on Medicare, children and adults with disabilities, and individuals in long term care.

Cardinal Care won’t change or reduce any existing coverage, the state’s Medicaid agency, the Department of Medical Assistance Services, said.

But looking ahead to the negotiations for a new five-year managed care contract with insures, providers at a DMAS advisory group, said it needed to be written to address their complaints about denials of coverage for specialized services.

The state plans to begin negotiations on a new five-year contract next year and to nail down an agreement by 2024. That contract will succeed the current contract which expires in fiscal year 2026.

It will involve a complicated juggling of the interests of several actors — patients, doctors and other providers some of whom are often at cross-purposes, MCOs — and the state agencies involved with the program — DMAS, which handles the money and sets the rules and the Department of Social Services, which determines which individuals are eligible for coverage.

Providers and insurers clash most often.  

Providers are often ignored when they bring issues to an insurer, said Marcia Tetterton, executive director of the Virginia Association for Home Care and Hospice.

Jennifer Faison, executive director of the Virginia Association of Community Services Boards, said the new contract needs to ensure more accountability over insurers’ utilization review – the process by which the firms decide whether or not a service will be covered.

The kind of work that’s the focus of Virginia’s community services boards — mental health care outside of hospitals – will be a major emphasis in the new contract, Secretary of Health and Human Resources John Littel has said.

This year has already seen a major step up in Medicaid’s mental health coverage with last December’s expansion of coverage for multisystemic therapy, intensive treatment for youth aged 11 to 18; functional family therapy, short term treatment for disruptive youth; 24-hour-a-day mobile crisis response; community stabilization for people recently receiving crisis care and short term residential stays in a crisis stabilization unit.

Craig Conners, director of payer relations at the Virginia Hospital and Health Care Association said standards for when an insurers’ network of doctors, hospitals and other caregivers is deemed adequate needs to be looked, while coordinating care when a patient is discharged is a problem.

Cardinal Care should make it easier to manage gaps in care, the Medicaid agency says, and it will provide care coordination services as needed.

The unification of Medallion 4.0 and Commonwealth Coordinated Care Plus into Cardinal Care should also simplify processes for contracting with providers and their credentialing, the Medicaid agency said.