Posted on

MCOs- Iowa’s $7 billion privatized Medicaid program will work with 3 health insurance companies

[MM Curator Summary]: The new contracts start next summer. Winners-Amerigroup (incumbent), Molina (highest score), and Total Care (Centene, incumbent).

 
 

Iowa will soon have three health insurance companies to help run its Medicaid program.

On Wednesday, the Iowa Department of Health and Human Services announced the intent to award managed care contracts to two winning bidders: Amerigroup Iowa and Molina Healthcare of Iowa. Iowa Total Care currently holds a managed care contract with Iowa that lasts through 2025.

Starting next year, these for-profit companies will help manage the joint federal and state program that finances roughly $7 billion in health care annually for nearly 790,000 Iowans who are lower income or have disabilities.

The state’s decision to privatize the Medicaid system in 2016 has been a controversial one. Over the years, Medicaid enrollees and health care providers have reported reduced services or challenges with receiving accurate reimbursement. The abrupt exit of two carriers within the first years of privatization also caused turmoil for its members.

But the head the state program says this round of contract negotiations includes steps to mitigate any future issues within the program.

“From when we first implemented managed care in 2016 to now, we’ve taken a lot of lessons learned,” Iowa Medicaid Director Elizabeth Matney said in an interview with the Des Moines Register.

What’s next for Iowa Medicaid?

There will be no immediate changes for Iowa Medicaid members with this week’s announcement. Four-year contracts with these managed care organizations begin July 1, 2023.

Medicaid members will be distributed among the three insurers as equitably as possible, Matney told reporters Wednesday. She did not say whether members could be assigned a new managed care organization, but noted member preference will play a role in the upcoming transition.

Matney said state officials are evaluating Medicaid provider networks to ensure members won’t have to seek a new provider if they transition to a new organization.

“We really want members to be able to make choices based on something other than which provider is in each one of the managed care organizations network,” she said.

Though there’s more optimism among critics in this latest round of contract negotiations, some said they had lingering concerns about the impact a transition will have on Medicaid members.

“I do believe the management team at Iowa HHS will do a better job of helping with this transition to adding a third (managed care organization) than we have seen in the past,” said state Sen. Pam Jochum, a Democrat from Dubuque. “But having said that, it will still be a tremendous upheaval for providers, for Medicaid members and for their families.”

A Medicaid member town hall meeting with state officials is scheduled for Thursday, Sept. 8. Details can be found on the Department of Human Service’s website.

More: Iowa introduces new Health and Human Services agency, but merger is still far from over

About the three companies working with Iowa Medicaid

Amerigroup, which currently holds a managed care contract with the state, is the only insurer that has been with the Medicaid program since the beginning. The company is a subsidiary of Indiana-based Elevance Health (formerly known as Anthem), which provides Medicaid coverage for 11 million members in 25 states.

Iowa Total Care is also already working within the program. Its contract ends in 2025. The Missouri-based subsidiary of Centene joined the program in mid-2019.

On Wednesday, officials at Iowa Total Care said it will continue to be part of the Iowa Medicaid program, regardless of the state’s intent to award new contracts.

“We look forward to continuing our partnership with the state, health care providers and community partners in delivering quality, effective care to our members,” officials said in a statement.

Molina Healthcare, headquartered in California, provides managed care services to roughly 5.2 million Medicaid and Medicare members through state insurance marketplaces.

In a statement Wednesday, Iowa HHS officials said they will be working with Molina on their readiness to join the program, and will continue to work with Amerigroup and Iowa Total Care to continue to provide services to members.

More: Iowa’s latest round of monkeypox vaccines in smaller, equally effective doses

How were winning bids selected?

Five potential vendors submitted bids after the state posted the request for proposals in February.

State officials said in Wednesday’s announcement that the process to evaluate these proposals included “a multi-disciplinary team across the HHS agency” who work in a number of initiatives relevant to the managed care program.

According to a summary review of the bidders’ proposals provided to the Register, Molina received the highest score among the five vendors, followed second by Amerigroup.

The state noted that Molina’s proposal showed advanced preparation, including documented engagement with providers and stakeholders as well as proposed staff positions that went beyond the state’s initial bid requirements.

Last year, the company had announced the hiring of Jennifer Vermeer as chief executive officer of Molina Healthcare of Iowa. Vermeer was the Iowa Medicaid director from 2008 to 2014, and most recently served as an executive at the University of Iowa Health Care.

In July, Molina Healthcare faced $1 million in penalties from California for failure to resolve provider disputes in a timely manner. To offset potential claims issues, Matney said Iowa is establishing strong oversight within the program to ensure insurers are meeting timeliness standards on reimbursements.

State officials said in a statement Molina was selected for the company’s “deep understanding” of managed care, especially its understanding of individuals who rely on long-term services and supports, a Medicaid waiver that covers individuals with the most complex health conditions.

“Having Molina working alongside Amerigroup and Iowa Total Care will position the state well to deliver on critical program improvements,” state officials said in a statement.

Officials did not specify why the other bidders — Aetna Health of Iowa, CareSource Iowa and UCare Iowa — were not selected.

However, in the review of the bidders’ proposals, officials highlighted weakness within individual applications to join the program. Reasons companies were docked points included limited managed care experience or lack of details in how initiatives would be deployed in Iowa.

State officials say the Medicaid program has improved

It’s been a little more than a year since Matney took the helm as director of the Iowa Medicaid program. In that time, Matney said program administrators are listening to members’ and providers’ feedback “like we never have before,” and taking those experiences to build a strategy to improve Iowa Medicaid.

“Since Day One, Director Matney has focused on tangible improvements for the Medicaid program,” said Kelly Garcia, director of the Iowa Department of Health and Human Services. “She has charted out a vision to identify and address gaps, to focus on outcomes, to improve infrastructure and operations and to promote transparency.”

Garcia continued, “Under Director Matney’s leadership the Iowa Medicaid program is really addressing the needs heard from the Iowans who rely on us. Making sure those we serve and those who advocate on their behalf are embedded in the conversation is the right thing to do and the work we’re doing reflects that.”

After a troubled history, state officials say they’ve included more checks on the program

Then-Gov. Terry Branstad announced his decision to switch to private management of the Medicaid program in early 2015, and despite intense pushback from Democrats and other critics, moved forward with the plan the following year.

Less than two years after rollout, AmeriHealth Caritas, one of the three national companies picked to manage Iowans health care, withdrew from the giant program.

Then in 2019, another managed care organization — UnitedHealthcare — quit after company officials disputed its contract with state leadership. Iowa Total Care took the helm shortly after the exit.

The “lessons learned” from these departures included creating a bid process and onboarding process for new managed care organizations that is robust to mitigate future issues with members getting services and providers being paid, Matney said.

That includes rigorous testing of claims submissions for services provided to members. Matney said prior to the 2016 implementation of managed care, program administrators learned they needed more provider input. This time around, Matney said the state is “going to be pushing hard and knocking on a lot of doors to get that participation.”

“From the initial rollout of managed care, we really did learn a lot about oversight and a lot about relationship development,” Matney said. “But we also learned a lot about what the program needs from the perspective of really solid rate development — not just for the managed care organizations, but for providers as well.”

Both AmeriHealth and UnitedHealthcare complained about the loss of hundreds of millions of dollars managing health care for thousands of fragile Iowans. While it’s not the state’s goal to help make companies rich off the Medicaid program, Matney said state leaders “do need to have everything in place so that they are financially stable.”

Matney said she’s also working to build transparent relationships with these insurers, so the state can be supportive as these companies manage often complex health benefits for Iowans.

“Ultimately, their success is our success,” Matney said.

Michaela Ramm covers health care for the Des Moines Register. She can be reached at mramm@registermedia.com, at (319) 339-7354 or on Twitter at @Michaela_Ramm.

This article originally appeared on Des Moines Register: Iowa’s Medicaid program will soon have 3 insurance companies

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.yahoo.com/video/iowas-7-billion-privatized-medicaid-171117909.html

Posted on

FWA- Alabama pill mill doctor’s sister said she obeyed him due to Nigerian cultural norms; sentences upheld

[MM Curator Summary]: Apparently the patriarchy and toxic masculinity in Nigerian culture is not a sufficient defense against fraud charges in Alabama.

 
 

Judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit upheld last week the 30-year sentence of an Alabama doctor who prescribed high numbers of opioids and fraudulently billed for allergy treatment.

A jury found Dr. Patrick Ifediba and his sister, Ngozi Justina Ozuligbo, guilty in 2019 on dozens of counts of health care fraud and controlled substances violations. U.S. District Court Judge David R. Proctor sentenced Ifediba to 30 years and Ozuligbo to three years in prison.

Ifediba challenged his conviction because the court barred evidence of his good care to other patients, failed to address wrongdoing by an alternate juror and incorrectly calculated the amount of unlawfully prescribed opioids, according to court documents.

Ifediba operated Care Complete Medical Clinic in Birmingham with his wife, Dr. Uchenna Ifediba. According to court documents, neither one specialized in pain care, but they prescribed high numbers of opioids such as oxycodone and fentanyl. About 85 percent of the patients at CCMC received opioid prescriptions, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

“CCMC attracted patients who were willing to wait over three hours in a dirty, crowded waiting room to receive prescriptions for controlled substances,” appeals court judges wrote in the opinion. “The clinic stayed open until 10:00 PM to accommodate them.”

Authorities in the case estimated Ifediba unlawfully prescribed between 30,000 and 90,000 kilograms of drugs. The doctor said the true estimate should have been between 1,000 and 3,000 kilograms, which would have reduced his sentence. Judges on the appeals court upheld the long sentence and agreed with the way federal investigators calculated the volume of drugs.

In addition to the opioid prescriptions, investigators also found that Ifediba performed costly allergy tests on almost all patients with insurance. He also prescribed expensive immunotherapy treatments for many patients, including some who tested negative for allergies.

The allergy tests cost more than $500 per patient and shots cost $2,660, according to the court opinion. Staff at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama initially flagged the high numbers of allergy treatments and notified federal authorities, according to court documents. When the insurer moved to audit the clinic, staff members changed documents and test results to support treatment.

During the trial, an alternate juror violated court instructions and did online research about the case and discussed it with coworkers, according to the opinion. The juror was dismissed, but Ifediba argued more should have been done to determine whether the alternate discussed findings with other jurors.

Ozuligbo also challenged her conviction, arguing that she should have been allowed to present evidence of Nigerian cultural norms that required her to obey her brother. She worked as a nurse with a company that administered allergy tests and treatment but remained on site at CCMC.

“There was more than sufficient evidence to demonstrate that CCMC defrauded insurers through an allergy fraud scheme,” judges wrote in the opinion. “The only question is whether Ozuligbo was a knowing and voluntary participant in the conspiracy.”

Although Ozuligbo said she was just an employee, medical records showed she had signed and recorded negative allergy tests and then administered treatments the patients didn’t need.

Ifediba was convicted on 14 counts of unlawful distribution of controlled substances, 10 counts of health care fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, among other charges. Ozuligbo was convicted of nine counts of health care fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, plus some additional charges.

U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama Prim F. Escalona made a statement in 2020 when Ifediba was sentenced.

“Physicians who choose to deal drugs while hiding behind their white coats are no different than drug dealers who hide in alleys,” Escalona said. “The greed of Dr. Ifediba contributed to the ongoing opioid crisis that is plaguing our communities.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/alabama-pill-mill-doctor-e2-80-99s-sister-said-she-obeyed-him-due-to-nigerian-cultural-norms-sentences-upheld/ar-AA11eO80

Posted on

LA- Louisiana Medicaid implementing new payment model for hospitals

[MM Curator Summary]: The move seeks to prevent disruption if /when current hospital sugar money strategies change at the federal level.

Payments will be made based on Medicaid utilization

Louisiana Medicaid has received approval from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to implement a new payment model for hospitals that is based on Medicaid utilization.

 
 

The new payment model increases hospital supplemental payments and prioritizes maintaining adequate funding for safety-net hospitals across Louisiana, without requiring additional state general funds. Additionally, the model creates more uniform guidelines and stability for hospital payments.

 
 

Developing a standardized funding formula for hospitals is one of the 17 initiatives included in our FY22 Business Plan

 
 

“We are excited to begin implementing this new payment model that is sustainable and equitable for hospital providers,” said LDH Undersecretary Ruth Johnson. “This new model, called a state directed payment model, changes the way we reimburse hospitals for care provided to Medicaid patients to align with guidance issued by CMS. The new model is a critical part of our Business Plan and was a top LDH priority during the Spring 2022 Regular Legislative Session.”

 
 

“This change demanded careful, attentive work and strong partnerships,” said Johnson. “We are thankful for the support of Gov. Edwards, the advocacy of the Louisiana Hospital Association (LHA), input from our legislative partners and the painstaking work of our LDH team members that made this new model possible.”

 
 

LDH through its Medicaid program has been working closely with CMS, hospital providers, the LHA,  legislators, and other stakeholders to design this new payment model. 

 
 

“This was important to legislators which is why we passed House Concurrent Resolution 8 of the 2022 Legislative Session,” said State Rep. Clay Schexnayder. “We are grateful for the thoughtful and transparent process LDH used in the development of this new hospital payment model, which focuses on effectively and appropriately funding our vital network of hospitals.”

 
 

“Hospitals are critical to our comprehensive medical care, to respond to health crises, and so much more,” said State Sen. Page Cortez. “This new payment model supports hospitals to ensure that they continue to be available in our communities for access by all of our state’s residents.”

 
 

“The LHA sincerely appreciates the hard work performed by LDH and Milliman throughout this process as well as their transparency and engagement with LHA and its member hospitals,” said LHA President and CEO Paul A. Salles. “We also want to thank the Louisiana Legislature for voting to implement this directed payment model when unanimously passing HCR 8 by House Speaker Clay Shexnayder (R-Gonzales). This new program requires no additional state general funds and places Louisiana in stronger compliance with federal guidelines, while making it easier for Louisiana hospitals to continue caring for their communities.”

 
 

The increased payments will be based upon Medicaid inpatient and outpatient hospital, long-term care, free-standing rehabilitation and free-standing psychiatric hospital services across the state. 

 
 

The new payment model became effective July 1, 2022.

 
 

Clipped from: https://ldh.la.gov/news/6732

Posted on

FWA- Montana Claimed Federal Medicaid Reimbursement for More Than $5 Million in Targeted Case Management Services That Did Not Comply With Federal and State Requirements

[MM Curator Summary]: The audit found that the correct procedures were in place to prevent the improper reimbursement; the state just didn’t follow its own procedures.

 
 

08-26-2022 | A-07-21-03246 | Complete Report | Report in Brief

Why OIG Did This Audit

Targeted Case Management (TCM) services assist specific State-designated Medicaid groups in gaining access to medical, social, educational, and other types of services. Previous Office of Inspector General (OIG) audits found that some States did not always claim Federal Medicaid reimbursement for TCM services in accordance with Federal and State requirements.

Our objective was to determine whether Montana claimed Federal Medicaid reimbursement for TCM services during Federal fiscal years (FYs) 2018 through 2020 in accordance with Federal and State requirements.

How OIG Did This Audit

Our audit covered $42.1 million ($27.5 million Federal share) in Medicaid payments for TCM services provided and paid for in Montana during FYs 2018 through 2020 (October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2020).

We reviewed documentation for a stratified random sample of 150 unique TCM grouped line items (sample items) from the 4 largest target groups in the State to determine whether the services provided were allowable, case managers providing services were qualified, and recipients receiving services were eligible. We reviewed payment rates to determine whether they matched the approved rates for the period. We compared TCM documentation provided by Montana to applicable Federal regulations and the State plan supplements governing Montana’s TCM program.

What OIG Found

Montana did not always claim Federal Medicaid reimbursement for TCM services during FYs 2018 through 2020 in accordance with Federal and State requirements. Of the 150 randomly sampled grouped line items, 43 sample items were at least partially unallowable because they had at least 1 error related to case managers lacking required experience or qualifications, unsupported services, unallowable services, or an ineligible recipient.

Montana had policies and procedures in place for the administration of TCM services that, if followed, would have ensured compliance with Federal and State requirements. Based on our sample results, we estimated that Montana claimed at least $7.7 million (more than $5 million Federal share) in unallowable Medicaid reimbursement for these services.

What OIG Recommends and Montana Comments

We recommend that Montana refund to the Federal Government the more than $5 million (Federal share) in overpayments. We also make procedural recommendations that Montana always follows its established policies and procedures regarding: (1) TCM providers’ case manager hiring practices, (2) verification that billed services were allowable and properly documented, and (3) verification that all individuals receiving services were eligible. Furthermore, we make procedural recommendations that Montana require TCM providers to comply with established policies and procedures.

Our draft report had identified 45 sample items with errors. Montana did not concur with 10 of the 45 sample items that we had identified as unallowable, said that these were allowable claims that were consistent with Federal and State law and policy, and gave us additional documentation. Montana neither agreed nor disagreed with our procedural recommendations but described corrective actions that it had taken or planned to take.

After reviewing Montana’s comments and the additional documentation provided, we revised, for this final report, the number of errors we identified from 45 to 43 sample items. Accordingly, we revised our statistical estimate and the dollar amount conveyed in our first recommendation. We maintain that our findings and recommendations, as revised, are valid.

Filed under: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

 
 

Clipped from: https://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region7/72103246.asp

Posted on

FWA- California suspends Medicaid payments to Borrego Health for 2nd time in 2 years

[MM Curator Summary]: If it walks like a duck..

 
 

For the second time in two years, California health officials are suspending all Medicaid payments to federally qualified health center Borrego Health for “continued and unresolved inappropriate billings,” the San Diego Union-Tribune reported Aug. 30.

The California Department of Health Care Services’ decision comes after state and federal authorities launched a criminal investigation into millions of dollars of alleged improper billings, excessive salaries and above-market rent payments at Borrego Spring-based Borrego Health, according to the report. It also comes after Borrego Community Healthcare Foundation sued several past board members, executives and contractors over allegations of racketeering, fraud, nepotism, excessive compensation and self-dealing.

Borrego Health’s Medicaid reimbursements were first suspended in December 2020 after state and federal agents raided Borrego Health locations, seizing computers, taking medical records and interviewing employees. 

Regulators agreed to reinstate Medicaid reimbursements for medical services in early 2021, but not for dental work, which remains the focus of the criminal investigation, according to the report. The reinstatement came after Borrego Health agreed to an independent monitor and other conditions. 

In an Aug. 19 letter obtained by the San Diego Union-Tribune, state health officials said they would withdraw all Medicaid reimbursements by Sept. 29 because of Borrego Health’s alleged failure to meet its settlement obligations.  

A Borrego Health spokesperson told the San Diego Union-Tribune the decision was unwarranted and unexpected and will “significantly and abruptly reduce access to care for thousands of at-risk Californians.”

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/california-suspends-medicaid-payments-to-borrego-health-for-2nd-time-in-2-years.html

Subscribe to the following topics: medicaidcalifornia

Posted on

FWA- Southwest Idaho woman gets jail, fines for Medicaid fraud

[MM Curator Summary]: Pretty pedestrian bogus claims fraud here. Nothing to see except another half a million or so of the taxes taken out of your W-2 going up in smoke.

 
 

 
 

BOISE, Idaho

A southwestern Idaho woman who pleaded guilty to defrauding the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare’s Medicaid program by falsely claiming services to participants with developmental disabilities has been sentenced to 180 days in the Ada County Jail and must repay more than $146,000 in criminal restitution.

Attorney General Lawrence Wasden announced Monday that 58-year-old Janna Lyn Miller of Kuna received the sentence Thursday in 4th District Court.

District Court Judge Samuel Hoagland also ordered Miller to pay $83,000 in criminal restitution as well as $2,000 in court costs. Officials recovered $64,000 in fraudulent payments before sentencing.

Miller also received a five-year suspended sentence with five years of probation. She will have to spend a minimum one year in state prison if she violates her probation.

In addition to the criminal restitution, Miller owes the state more than $234,000 in additional overpayments and related penalties. All told, she is responsible for paying more than $375,000 related to her company’s actions.

The attorney general’s office said that Miller owned and operated Inclusion, Inc., a Meridian-based company that provided home health, supervised employment, mental health counseling and social support services to Idaho Medicaid participants with developmental disabilities.

Besides the main office in Meridian, the company also had offices in Sandpoint, Coeur d’Alene and Twin Falls.

The attorney general’s office said Miller wrongfully obtained Medicaid funds by making false representations or directing workers to make false representations regarding services provided.

Miller’s prosecution resulted from a coordinated effort by the U.S. Department of Health and Welfare’s Medicaid Program Integrity Unit, the Idaho Branch of the Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the state attorney general’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit.

This story was originally published August 30, 2022 5:12 AM.

Clipped from: https://www.newsobserver.com/news/article265057249.html

News


 

Posted on

MCO- UPMC Health Plan adds more than 11,000 Philadelphia-area Medicaid members

[MM Curator Summary]: The PA MCO continues to have success; this time in a new region (for Medicaid anyway- they already had a strong duals presence there).

 
 

Enlarge

A billboard used to promote UPMC Health Plan’s Medicaid managed care product, UPMC for You, in the Philadelphia region.

UPMC Health Plan

Medicaid managed care companies serving the five-county Philadelphia region have new competition from western Pennsylvania.

During this year’s open enrollment period, Pittsburgh-based UPMC Health Plan signed up 11,142 Medicaid recipients in Southeastern Pennsylvania for its UPMC for You plan, which will operate statewide as of Sept. 1.

John Lovelace, president of UPMC Health Plan, said that enrollment number will likely rise in the days ahead because the state will be randomly assigning — in an equitable manner — any Medicaid beneficiaries who did not enroll in a Physical HealthChoices program plan to a program participant.

“We’re starting off our big push forward with about 130,000 new people across Pennsylvania on Thursday, and maybe more,” Lovelace said.

 
 

Enlarge

UPMC Health Plan President John Lovelace

UPMC Health Plan

The Pennsylvania Department of Health, after a process delayed by litigation for several years, this year changed its lineup of health insurers participating in the state’s Physical HealthChoices program. The program requires recipients of Medicaid, which covers health care costs for low-income families and individuals, to enroll in a choice of managed care plans.

The state has separate Medicaid manage cared programs for mental health services, for children and for people dually eligible for Medicaid and Medicare — the federal and state program that covers health care costs of the elderly.

UPMC was selected as a Physical HealthChoices program participant in all five geographic zones in the state including Southeastern Pennsylvania, where it will compete with Independence Health Group’s Keystone First and Health Partners Plans, both of which are based in Philadelphia, along with United Healthcare and Geisinger Health Plans.

The biggest change locally is Aetna will no longer be part of the program.

The five-county region has 1 million people who qualify for the Physical HealthChoices program. The two Philadelphia-based companies lead the market, with Keystone having about 524,000 Medicaid members and Health Partners Plans having about 273,000.

New enrollment numbers for all the plans, following open enrollment, are not yet available.

UPMC Health Plan already has a presence in the Philadelphia region, Lovelace said, covering about 32,000 people who are either dually Medicare and Medicaid eligible or Medicare special needs patients.

Lovelace said the plan is in the process of expanded its Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) coverage in the Philadelphia region.

Prior to expanding into Southeastern Pennsylvania as well as Northeastern Pennsylvania, where it has picked up about 20,715 Medicaid members, UPMC had about 560,000 Medicaid plan members throughout the rest of the state.

Clipped from: https://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/news/2022/08/30/upmc-health-plan-medicaid-philadelphia-pittsburgh.html

Posted on

OP ED Grab-Bag: Medicaid work requirements aren’t inherently a bad thing

[MM Curator Summary]: The author suggests that the success of welfare reform- which got single mothers into the workforce- should be considered before we burn the Republican witches at the stake.

 
 

“Work requirements” are back in the news, after a federal judge ruled in favor of Georgia’s Medicaid “waiver.” It’s worth exploring what this means — and what it doesn’t.

You may recall this discussion from years past. Rather than expanding Medicaid as envisioned by Obamacare, Gov. Brian Kemp sought and received federal permission for a more limited expansion, including a work requirement. But within days of Joe Biden entering the White House, the federal government signaled it would rescind that approval, which it did late last year.

First things first: “work requirements” is a misnomer. In fact, the Georgia Pathways program offers several ways to meet the 80-hours-per-month qualification. Those include a job, job training, community service and some types of education.

 
 

But to the extent “work requirements” are fulfilled by actual work, they’re a proven way to help Americans better themselves financially. We can see this from the successful welfare reforms of the 1990s.

A 2016 study of the effects of the reforms by the Manhattan Institute found child poverty, for example, fell from 29% in 1993 — exactly where it stood back in 1967 — to 18% in 2000 and 17% in 2009. Even after the Great Recession, it was significantly lower than pre-reform, at 19% in 2012.

What changed? Single mothers joined the workforce. Before, they faced a choice between working and receiving benefits — a choice that skewed toward welfare because of the relatively high wages one would have to earn to replace those benefits. With greater latitude to work, single mothers began working at much higher rates: a 15-percentage-point increase between 1996 and 1999, compared with a 10-point increase between 1980 and 1996. The share of single mothers on welfare fell from 50% in 1996 to 17% in 2008.

How does that apply to Medicaid? It largely hasn’t. Courts ruled that adding work requirements for existing recipients in Arkansas and Kentucky was unlawful because it would cost some people their coverage. Opponents of Georgia’s waiver pointed to those rulings as a reason Kemp was wasting his time.

But Kemp’s program, called Georgia Pathways, essentially reverse-engineered the Arkansas and Kentucky rulings. Rather than adding work requirements for current beneficiaries, Georgia uses “qualifying activities” to determine eligibility for the new program. People can’t lose coverage they never had.

 
 

Thus, Georgia Pathways can only increase coverage. That was central to the Aug. 19 decision by U.S. District Judge Lisa Godbey Wood, which set aside the Biden administration’s rescission of Georgia’s waiver.

Pending an appeal by CMS, we may finally get to see how work requirements fit with Medicaid. We can expect good things.

First and foremost, we can expect better health outcomes for recipients — even if federal judges have said health outcomes aren’t a priority for Medicaid waivers, because coverage is the program’s central objective. Why better outcomes? Research indicates employed people tend to remain healthier. Even if that isn’t a primary objective of Medicaid, it would be a worthy result.

Georgia Pathways also prioritizes private coverage for workers whose employers offer health insurance. That’s beneficial for them in two key ways. First, private insurance is much more widely accepted by providers than traditional Medicaid, so these workers are far more likely to gain access to care.

Then there’s continuity of coverage. The income limit for Georgia Pathways is 100% of the federal poverty line, or $13,590 for a single adult this year. A part-time worker earning $13.50 per hour would barely qualify. But if he got an hourly raise of even 10 cents, he might lose it.

With traditional Medicaid, that would mean losing his specific plan, with its specific network of doctors. But with Georgia Pathways, he would already be on his employer’s plan. Although he would have to pay more in premiums, he could stay on the same plan and keep the same doctors.

All of this is more complicated than our bumper-sticker politics prefers. But it’s clear that with this ruling, Georgians may finally get a plan that works.

 
 

Clipped from: https://thebrunswicknews.com/opinion/editorial_columns/medicaid-work-requirements-arent-inherently-a-bad-thing/article_809114f7-f637-51ec-96da-48b291302c98.html

 
 

Posted on

OP ED Grab-Bag: School is where health care happens for kids. Changes in Medicaid can help

[MM Curator Summary]: The author provides a decent primer on schools as a place of service, including challenges in getting states to take advantage of Medicaid funding for school-based care.

 
 

Schools are places where health care happens, an essential part of the nation’s public health infrastructure. During COVID-19, schools across the country responded to the call to action to vaccinate students and community members and to provide nutritious meals and mental health counseling services to kids — despite shuttered classrooms. Even before the pandemic, schools were providing care that supports classroom learning to the 14% of public school children who have special health care needs, including those with chronic physical, developmental, behavioral or emotional conditions.

A recent study in JAMA Pediatrics found that schools are “the de facto mental health system,” providing services to 57% of adolescents who needed care before the pandemic. In 2019, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found 37% of high school students reported persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness; 19% having seriously considered suicide; and 9% having attempted suicide. And the need is even more profound now. From April to October 2021, the proportion of pediatric emergency room visits that were mental health-related increased nearly a third for ages 12 to 17 and 24% for children aged 5 to 11.

As is always the challenge in public education, the need far outweighs the resources available. But changes in federal Medicaid payment policy have paved the way for schools to access millions of dollars to fund school nursing, behavioral health and other services in schools.

For example, in 2014, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services broadened a longstanding policy to allow schools to be reimbursed for providing covered services to any Medicaid-eligible child. But only 17 states have taken advantage of this funding stream by amending their Medicaid state plans (the document that defines the types of services and providers that are eligible for reimbursement) to reflect the new policy.

Michigan altered its state plan to include behavioral health analysts, school social workers and school psychologists as covered providers, while the state legislature approved $31 million to fund behavioral health providers in schools. Since this change, there has been about a 6% increase in the amount of Medicaid reimbursement being directed to schools. Louisiana amended its Medicaid state plan in 2015 and saw a 30% increase in its Medicaid revenue as the school nursing workforce grew 15%. Last year, Georgia changed its plan to allow Medicaid to pay for more school health services. Half of Georgia’s kids are covered by Medicaid or the state’s PeachCare system, so this shift is dramatic and creates an opportunity to bring hundreds of millions of dollars to Georgia’s school districts to support the most vulnerable students.

More states can position themselves to leverage Medicaid funding for schools by clarifying and expanding the scope of covered school health services and providers in their state Medicaid plans. But, some schools face additional barriers, such as complex billing processes. That issue is being addressed in the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, which directs federal policymakers to issue guidance, launch a help center and release $50 million in planning grants in the next 12 months to assist state Medicaid agencies and local educational entities in overcoming these challenges. These supports are likely to include strategies and tools to reduce administrative burdens for billing, especially for rural schools, and best practices that schools and state Medicaid agencies can use to amend state plans so the services students need, and the providers who deliver them, become eligible for reimbursement by Medicaid.

The National Healthy Schools Collaborative’s Ten Year Roadmap for Healthy Schools prioritizes optimizing the ability of schools to bill Medicaid for school health services and, importantly, recognizes that when health and education officials fail to collaborate, it makes it very difficult to achieve this end. School nurses, district administrators and state education officials must get ready to collaborate with state Medicaid agencies to take advantage of supports the act will provide — preparing data on the health needs of their school communities, the types of services provided in schools (and that schools could start providing if reimbursed) and the types of licenses and credentials required for personnel delivering services in schools. State Medicaid officials can then make sure state plan amendments reflect the exact types of services students need and that schools are capable of delivering.

How else can school nurses, district administrators, and state education officials prepare?

  • Find out which states reimburse for Medicaid. Share information about the forthcoming supports for increasing access to Medicaid funds for school health services and providers.
  • Engage with school or district Student Health Advisory Committees to collect community input on the health services they want to access, understand school communities’ unmet health needs and increase awareness of the availability of Medicaid services in school.
  • Review the Community Health Needs Assessments from local hospitals to further understand the significant health needs of the community and the resources available to address those needs.
  • Make connections at the state’s Medicaid agency and advocate for reimbursing school providers for specific services (e.g., counseling, personal care, case management, immunizations) that are a priority for students.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.laschoolreport.com/commentary-school-is-where-health-care-happens-for-kids-changes-in-medicaid-can-help/

Posted on

FGA Files Lawsuit Against the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for Stonewalling Requests Regarding Hospital Price Transparency

[MM Curator Summary]: Nearly 66% of hospitals are no complying with the CMS rule about making charge data public. This is a BFD, as our current President has been known to say.

 
 

 
 

Today, the Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) filed a lawsuit against the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)

NAPLES, Fla., Aug. 30, 2022 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ — Today, the Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) filed a lawsuit against the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) after the agency, under the leadership of the Biden administration, failed to respond to FGA’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to obtain documents pertaining to a 2020 rule requiring hospitals to make standard charges public (84 FR 65524). Information FGA has uncovered to date reveals that CMS is failing to fully enforce the hospital price transparency rule. FGA chose to file suit after CMS repeatedly stonewalled their FOIA requests regarding the rule’s enforcement.

FGA released a report this morning revealing that nearly two-thirds of hospitals are not complying with the rule’s price transparency requirements, with several large hospitals and hospital systems being key violators of the rule.

“Though the Biden administration initially seemed to improve the hospital price transparency rule through increased penalties, its unwillingness to fully enforce the rule has rendered those improvements meaningless,” said Tarren Bragdon, FGA President and CEO. “With soaring inflation rates and hospitals raising prices, Americans shouldn’t have to worry or guess what a hospital visit will cost them. Patients deserve to know real prices up-front, and we intend to do everything in our power to ensure the Biden administration enforces this rule. No hospital, big or small, should get away with non-compliance and CMS has an obligation to hold these hospitals accountable.”

###
The Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) is a non-profit, multi-state think tank that promotes public policy solutions to create opportunities for every American to experience the American Dream. To learn more, visit TheFGA.org

 
 

Clipped from: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fga-files-lawsuit-against-centers-202500390.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAALMMY3tMR3RhrBoLTCC4IVoMnJqTkqJLK9JvU3K6_47OwWsDqX-MvLdIM-nGFWO39Gv-jR5JqFS5UF0j6GZh55r-5lDL3rrJUfch3b7NXpM7nSCrrZePaXTlrzUbV_EF3nWn5iftRoHCVIcvk4mdCEoLkf12knLVhqBSHzgeCuGg