Posted on

AZ Medicaid- Title: Accountant 1

Clipped from: https://jobs.azahcccs.gov/title-accountant-1/job/20776155?utm_campaign=google_jobs_apply&utm_source=google_jobs_apply&utm_medium=organic

AHCCCS

The Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS), Arizona’s Medicaid agency, is driven by its mission to deliver comprehensive, cost-effective health care to Arizonans in need. AHCCCS is a nationally acclaimed model among Medicaid programs and a recipient of multiple awards for excellence in workplace effectiveness and flexibility.

AHCCCS employees are passionate about their work, committed to high performance, and dedicated to serving the citizens of Arizona. Among government agencies, AHCCCS is recognized for high employee engagement and satisfaction, supportive leadership, and flexible work environments, including remote work opportunities. With career paths for seasoned professionals in a variety of fields, entry-level positions, and internship opportunities, AHCCCS offers meaningful career opportunities in a competitive industry.


Come join our dynamic and dedicated team.

Accountant 1
 

Job Location:

Address:  801 E. Jefferson Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85034

Posting Details:

Salary: $47,850 – $51,394

Grade: 19
 

Closing Date: Open until filled

Job Summary:

The Division of Business and Finance (DBF) is looking for a highly motivated individual to join our team as an Accountant-1. The person in this position will be responsible to validate and reconcile system interface files from PMMIS to AFIS. This person will also handle the unit call center to research and answer providers’ concerns and requests. Major duties and responsibilities include but are not limited to:

* Validate and reconcile system interface files from PMMIS to AFIS for payments.

* Monitor processing of Medicaid provider creation and modification interface files into AFIS and identify issues for corrective action.


* Process and review providers electronic funds transfer (ACH/EFT) enrollment requests.


* Reconcile and report sub fund revenues/expenditures and cash balance to management on a monthly basis.


* Reconcile suspense account and research aged invoice status in AFIS on an annual basis.


* Run weekly Health Plans payment report for management.


* Run monthly, quarterly and annually report for Department of Insurance.


* Enter and process supplemental manual payments in accordance to appropriated funds and Federal rates.


* Review supplemental Manual Payments entered by other staff to make sure they are in accordance with appropriate funds and federal rates.


* Monitor providers’ tickets and warrant inquiries email for provider concerns and requests.


* Support unit call center for providers’ inquires and requests.

Knowledge, Skills & Abilities (KSAs):

* Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP); comprehensive knowledge of the principles, concepts, practices, methods, and techniques of governmental accounting.

* Demonstrate independence, strong analytical, organizational, and problem-solving skills, including the ability to maintain and reconcile complex multiple funding source payment methodologies.


* Good oral and written communication skills.


* Ability to adapt to changing priorities in an efficient and effective manner.

Qualifications:

Minimum:
* Bachelor’s Degree in accounting or a closely related field required.

Preferred:

* Knowledge and experience of robust automated accounting systems. Accounts Payable, Cash Receipt, General Ledger and Vendor Customer modules are a plus
* Proficient in Microsoft Office (Excel, Word, Power Point).

Pre-Employment Requirements:

* Successfully complete the Electronic Employment Eligibility Verification Program (E-Verify), applicable to all newly hired State employees.

* Successfully pass fingerprint background check, prior employment verifications and reference checks; employment is contingent upon completion of the above-mentioned process and the agency’s ability to reasonably accommodate any restrictions.


* Travel may be required for State business. Employees who drive on state business must complete any required driver training (see Arizona Administrative Code R2-10-207.12.) AND have an acceptable driving record for the last 39 months including no DUI, suspension or revocations and less than 8 points on your license. If an Out of State Driver License was held within the last 39 months, a copy of your MVR (Motor Vehicle Record) is required prior to driving for State Business. Employees may be required to use their own transportation as well as maintaining valid motor vehicle insurance and current Arizona vehicle registration; however, mileage will be reimbursed.

Benefits:

Among the many benefits of a career with the State of Arizona, there are:
10 paid holidays per year
Paid Vacation and Sick time off (12 and 13 days per year respectively) – start earning it your 1st day (prorated for part-time employees)
A top-ranked retirement program with lifetime pension benefits
A robust and affordable insurance plan, including medical, dental, life, and disability insurance
Participation eligibility in the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program (must meet qualifications)
RideShare and Public Transit Subsidy
A variety of learning and career development opportunities
Opportunity to work 100% virtually or remotely on an ad-hoc basis (home office)

By providing the option of a full-time or part-time virtual/remote work schedule, employees enjoy improved work/life balance, report higher job satisfaction, and are more productive. Remote work is a management option and not an employee entitlement or right. An agency may terminate a remote work agreement at its discretion.

For a complete list of benefits provided by The State of Arizona, please visit our benefits page

Retirement:

Lifetime Pension Benefit Program
Administered through the Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS)
Defined benefit plan that provides for life-long income upon retirement.
Required participation for Long-Term Disability (LTD) and ASRS Retirement plan.
Pre-taxed payroll contributions begin after a 27-week waiting period (prior contributions may waive the waiting period).

Deferred Retirement Compensation Program

Voluntary participation.
Program administered through Nationwide.
Tax-deferred retirement investments through payroll deductions.

Contact Us:

Persons with a disability may request a reasonable accommodation such as a sign language interpreter or an alternative format by emailing careers@azahcccs.gov.
Requests should be made as early as possible to allow time to arrange the accommodation. Arizona State Government is an AA/EOE/ADA Reasonable Accommodation Employer.

Posted on

Medicaid Managed Care Ombudsman, Family Support and Health Care Program – Charlotte, NC

Clipped from: https://www.indeed.com/viewjob?jk=a402e9211a03ae3a&utm_campaign=google_jobs_apply&utm_source=google_jobs_apply&utm_medium=organic

Benefits

Pulled from the full job description

Dental insurance

Health insurance

Vision insurance

Indeed’s salary guide

  • Not provided by employer
  • $35.4K – $44.8K a year is Indeed’s estimated salary for this role in Charlotte, NC.

POSITION NOTICE


 

Medicaid Ombudsman
Family Support and Health Care Program


Charlotte Center for Legal Advocacy, non-profit agency that provides legal

assistance in civil matters to low-income person in Charlotte and Western North Carolina,
seeks an Ombudsman for the NC Medicaid Ombudsman program, working closely with
the Advocacy Center’s Family Support and Health Care Program. More information about
the Advocacy Center can be found on its website, www.charlottelegaladvocacy.org


Responsibilities



 

  • Assist low-income families by telephone and online to access and use health care

coverage under Medicaid and in resolving disputes with Medicaid health insurance
plans

  • Assist with outreach to educate families of available coverage choices and their

rights under Medicaid managed care

  • Provide referrals to appropriate agencies for applicants and enrollees with

grievances, complaints, questions, or need for other social services

  • Provide all information and services in a manner that is culturally and linguistically

appropriate and ensure accessibility for individuals with disabilities

  • Work with English and Spanish language media (including print, radio, and

television) to share information on the NC Medicaid Ombudsman program
 

Qualifications

  • Two-year or four-year college degree or equivalent training or experience
  • Paralegal, legal assistant, or social work training or experience preferred
  • Spanish language proficiency is preferred
  • Experience working with low-income communities preferably at a non-profit or

community-based organization within a multi-ethnic/multi-cultural environment
preferred

  • Experience with public benefits eligibility and/or work experience as a health

insurance service representative preferred

  • Proficiency in MS Office, including Word, Excel, Power Point and Adobe PDF

professional

  • Ability to work independently and in a team environment
  • Ability to effectively collaborate with co-workers and clients in virtual and in-person

meetings

General Requirements

  • Be free from conflicts of interests, including payments and incentives from health

insurance industry

  • Possess socio-economic and cultural sensitivity and ability to communicate with

persons in crisis or under stress

  • Ability to multi-task and interact well with colleagues, clients, and others.

Physical Requirements

  • Prolonged periods of sitting at a desk and working on a computer.
  • Must be able to lift 15 pounds at times.
  • Must be able to access and navigate each department at the organization’s

facilities.

Classification

This is a full-time, salary, non-exempt position with the starting salary scale beginning
at $38,350, may be adjusted for experience.

Charlotte Center for Legal Advocacy offers a generous leave and benefits package,
including medical, dental, and vision coverage at 100% for employees, 22 paid days of
General Leave, 12 paid holidays, and 100% employer-paid professional liability.

To Apply

Please send a resume and cover letter to careers@charlottelegaladvocacy.org and include
the position for which you are applying in the subject line of your email.

Charlotte Center for Legal Advocacy provides equal employment opportunities to all
employees and applicants for employment and prohibits discrimination and harassment of
any type without regard to race, color, religion, age, sex, national origin, disability status,
genetics, protected veteran status, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or any
other characteristic protected by federal, state, or local laws. This policy applies to all terms
and conditions of employment, including recruiting, hiring, placement, promotion,
termination, layoff, recall, transfer, leaves of absence, compensation, and training.

Posted on

VP Regional Medicaid President – Humana

Clipped from: https://careers.humana.com/job/17311376/vp-regional-medicaid-president-multiple-locations-remote/?utm_campaign=google_jobs_apply&utm_source=google_jobs_apply&utm_medium=organic

If you are an existing CenterWell or Humana
associate, please apply through go/associatecareers using a Chrome or Edge browser.


 

 
 

About this job

Description

Humana is expanding its Medicaid footprint. We are seeking Medicaid State Leaders. The State Market Leader will be based in IN, TX, VA or GA and will be the primary contact for the local Department of Medicaid Services regarding all issues and will coordinate with other key personnel to fulfill programmatic requirements.

Responsibilities

Humana’s Medicaid State Market Leader will be responsible for the overall strategic direction, oversight, and administration of programs and services for our Medicaid program in one of the following states; IN, TX, VA or GA.  They will lead the Humana’s Medicaid executive team and report directly to Humana’s National Medicaid President. The

Read more about this job

Apply now

Share this job:

Humana is at the nexus of the innovation taking place within healthcare. Broadly speaking, we are one of the most active participants in the sector. This is an exciting company headquartered in a city with an excellent quality of life!

Oliver
Director, Corporate Development and Venture Capital

 
 

I looked for the opportunity for growth and stability and I found it here.

Barry
Manager, Software Engineering Strategic HR Systems

 
 

Humana has really helped my sense of belonging because I feel part of the team.

Rosemary
Senior Consumer Experience Professional

 
 

I chose to work at Humana because I heard a lot of great things about the company. It’s a very accommodating place and I enjoy working here.

Majenta
Inbound Contact Representative

The best part of this company is the commitment to associates, which naturally leads to commitment to members.

Abigail
Medical Director, Mid-South

 
 

Equal Opportunity Employer

It is our policy to recruit, hire, train, and promote people without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, disability, or veteran status, except where age, sex, or physical status is a bona fide occupational qualification. View the EEO is the Law poster.

If you are an individual with a disability and require a reasonable accommodation to complete any part of the application process, or are limited in the ability or unable to access or use this online application process and need an alternative method for applying, you may contact yourcareer@humana.com for assistance.

Humana Health and Safety Policy

Humana and its subsidiaries require vaccinated associates who work outside of their home to submit proof of vaccination, including COVID-19 boosters. Associates who remain unvaccinated must either undergo weekly negative COVID testing OR wear a mask at all times while in a Humana facility or while working outside of their homes. Learn how we are doing our part

Humana Security Notice

Humana will never ask, nor require a candidate to provide money for work equipment and network access during the application process. If you become aware of any instances where you as a candidate are asked to provide information and do not believe it is a legitimate request from Humana or affiliate, please contact yourcareer@humana.com to validate the request.

California Residents

If you are a California resident and would like to review our California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Policy click here:

CA Resident Privacy Policy

Posted on

Medicaid Fraud Criminal Investigator at State of Montana

Clipped from: https://www.ziprecruiter.com/c/State-of-Montana/Job/Medicaid-Fraud-Criminal-Investigator/-in-Bozeman,MT?jid=43d3ed5b2eccb2e0&utm_campaign=google_jobs_apply&utm_source=google_jobs_apply&utm_medium=organic

Description:

Division Overview:



Montana’s Division of Criminal Investigation is a diverse public safety team of professionals who provide a full range of criminal investigative services to state, local, and tribal law enforcement. From homicide investigations to illegal narcotics, criminal records, cybercrime, human trafficking, missing persons, or through training and certifying public safety officers, DCI serves as the hub in providing critical law enforcement support. Our diverse customer base includes protecting our vulnerable population, managing the sexual and violent offender registry, serving as the hub of communication for criminal justice information networks and the storage of criminal records, conducting arson investigations, as well as providing intelligence analysis support for local law enforcement. Many of our positions within DCI go without public recognition but remain the lifeline of support for public safety. With a doctrine of service, honor, and justice, this statewide organization provides the best in critical, accurate, and timely service to protect our citizens.


Job Overview:


This is a Criminal Investigator position in the Medicaid Fraud Control Section (MFCU) and is responsible for coordinating and conducting investigations of crimes involving fraud to the Montana Medicaid program by providers, abuse or neglect of patients or residents in health care or board and care facilities receiving payments under Medicaid, and misappropriation of funds or property of patients or residents of health care facilities receiving payments under Montana Medicaid. Criminal investigations involve allegations of fraud, drug diversion, abuse, neglect, assault, sexual assault and homicide.

Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities:



  • The position requires extensive knowledge of law enforcement; investigative procedures; planning; report writing, coordinating the activities of multiple agencies and jurisdictions; developing, conducting, and presenting complex long-term cases; criminal procedures, collection and rules of evidence, criminal justice information and privacy/security regulations, family services, Social Services and Institutions and law enforcement and investigation including criminal justice information. Knowledgeable, proficient, and skilled in the use of firearms. Knowledgeable regarding proper procedures for writing and executing search warrants, investigative subpoenas, and forfeiture documents.
  • Skill in using all types of complicated equipment necessary to conduct criminal investigations; conducting undercover investigations; making correct/legal and appropriate decisions in highly stressful situations; establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with employees; communicating effectively verbally and in writing; and in reviewing case plans and information. Skilled in drafting and presenting search warrants, investigative subpoenas and forfeiture documents to prosecutors and judges for review and issuance.
  • Skill in examining all types of evidence to determine its relevance to the prosecution of the case and to properly document its relationship to the case and criminals. Procedures followed include standards of law enforcement and criminal investigation profession, best practices in investigation, and federal, state, and local regulations.
  • Knowledge of Montana Codes Annotated (MCA) dealing with crimes (MCA, Title 45, “Crimes”), criminal procedure (MCA, Title 46, “Criminal Procedure”), rules of evidence (MCA, Title 26, Chapter 10, “Montana Rules of Evidence”), seizures related to contraband, criminal justice information and privacy/security regulations (MCA, Title 44, Chapter 5, “Criminal Justice Information”); family services (MCA, Title 52); Social Services and Institutions (MCA, Title 53); CFR 18 and 42; ARMs; and law enforcement and investigation including criminal justice information and rules of evidence.

Qualifications

If another department vacancy occurs in this job title within six months, the same applicant pool may be used for the selection.

Posted on

NY- Medicaid reimbursements inadequate to cover new $17 minimum for home health aides, agencies say

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Home health workers say they are not seeing the money appropriated to up their wages; MCOs say not everybody was supposed to get a raise per the legislation; the legislator who sponsored the bill that funded the increase said it was written poorly; home health agencies cry Big Bad MCOs; and Big Union blames everybody.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.newsday.com/business/home-health-aide-medicaid-minimum-wage-mkef5db1

Home care worker Mildred Garcia-Gallery, right, assists Christine Cipriani at Cipriani’s home in Garden City South. Credit: Newsday/J. Conrad Williams Jr.

An hourly wage increase of $2 designed to help ease the shortage of home care aides is finally in place, but industry players disagree about whether the raise can accomplish its goal without collateral damage. 

At stake is home care for Long Island’s growing older population. The region has around 40,140 home care and personal care aides, and is projected to see openings increase by over 64% by 2028,  according to the state Department of Labor. Agencies that employ home health aides have said they had trouble attracting workers for the demanding jobs at the previous $15 an hour minimum wage in a market where workers can often make more at Target or Walmart.

In the years prior to the state’s multi-year push to a $15 overall minimum, agency advocates said aides were regularly offered starting pay above minimum wage. But as the minimum wage increased,  state-assigned Medicaid reimbursements for many home care agencies did not keep pace,  leaving them  struggling to keep up.

 Home care agencies hailed the move to $17 an hour as a victory when lawmakers included it in the state budget this spring, allocating $7.7 billion to fund it over the next four years. 

But now, with the increase in effect since Oct. 1, some agencies say they’re not being reimbursed enough to cover the higher pay. They blame the insurance companies that administer the state Medicaid funds. And they say the raise could end up having the opposite effect, forcing them to reduce workers’ hours and cut staff, or even putting their businesses at risk.  

On the other side, the insurance companies charge that some agency owners, already receiving adequate reimbursements, are asking for more just to pad their profits.

A workers’ union says both things are happening. And a legislator who pushed for the higher wage blames poorly crafted language in the state budget for the mess that has threatened the goal — to address the labor shortage and make more caregivers available. 

“It is critical that the funds that legislators intended to go to worker pay do exactly that,” said Kathy Febraio, president and chief executive of the New York State Association of Health Care Providers, a trade group representing around 125 home care agencies. 

According to an Oct. 5 survey of Febraio’s membership, 75% said they were not getting reimbursement rates high enough to cover increased payroll costs. If the rates they’ve been offered weren’t raised, 29% of respondents said they would reduce staffing levels, with 72% saying they would reduce service hours.

Twelve percent of respondents said they would go out of business.

Representatives for insurance plans, though, reject the assertion that they are withholding reimbursement dollars or providing inadequate reimbursement to agencies.

 Insurance plans “have been working diligently to allocate the wage funding provided to them to home care providers which in turn should be spent on workers,” said Eric Linzer, president and chief executive of the New York Health Plan Association, a trade group representing the managed long-term care insurance plans that administer the funds.

“No health plan is paying any provider less than what they need to meet wage, benefit and administrative requirements,” Linzer said. “What’s happening here is you have some providers that already have received enough funding. It kind of begs the question of why do some of them need more, other than to pad profits.” 

“I’m very happy that [workers are] getting the increase,” said Nicole Laborde, who owns Ideal Home Care Services in Hauppauge, a provider of home health aides. “However, it’s going to affect a lot of home health care agencies, especially smaller ones.”

Laborde said the insurance providers aren’t providing high enough reimbursement rates to agencies.

“Nobody really looked at how the home care agencies are going to be compensated to be able to afford this increase,” said Laborde, who is also founder and chief executive of Ideal School of Allied Health Care in Hauppauge, which trains health care workers including home aides.

The wage increase is meant to help address a critical labor shortage that’s only expected to worsen as the need for home care aides grows in the coming years.

Aging Baby Boomers have increased the demand for home health services on Long Island as the preference for “aging in place” has grown, said economist Shital Patel with the Labor Department’s Hicksville office. Health care reform has also encouraged the use of home care as an alternative to expensive nursing homes and hospital stays, she said.

There are more than 1,300 licensed or certified home care agencies statewide, according to the New York State Association of Health Care Providers. 

Competition for entry level workers from employers like Amazon and Target offering higher hourly wages in the wake of the pandemic has only exacerbated the difficulty in recruiting aides,  who provide critical services to seniors and others living at home. Aides not only provide care, but can often become a vital source of companionship,  developing close relationships with patients and their families, said aides and care recipients. 

Because most patients use Medicaid to cover home care, wages for workers largely rely on reimbursement rates set by managed long-term care plans. While Medicaid is traditionally government health insurance for the most impoverished Americans, it is one of the few ways patients can cover the high cost of home care.

“There are only a few ways to pay for home care,” said Nicole Christensen, patient advocate and president of Care Answered, a Freeport business that helps families navigate the complex world of health care for seniors. Because private health insurance seldom covers home care, she said patients have three options when paying for those services: Paying out of pocket “which becomes very expensive very quickly;” long term care insurance, “which not many people have,” and community-based Medicaid, a form of Medicaid that specifically covers nursing home-level care in the home.

 Agencies said they would like to see the state Health Department step in and set a standard reimbursement rate  for agencies, which currently negotiate  individually with insurance firms.

On average, Febraio said members of her trade organization have been receiving $1.33 per hour in extra reimbursement, half of the $2.66 the group estimated members would need to cover wage increases plus higher payroll taxes and other related costs. 

“I believe the Department of Health thought the money would flow through the plans to providers and ultimately to the workers,” Febraio said. “The information that we’re giving to them is making it clear that that’s not happening.”

Linzer, representing the insurance firms, said that when the state set aside funding for reimbursement , they did not intend for every agency to receive a bump of $2 if their existing contracts had higher rates to begin with.

“The state has been very clear that this is not supposed to be a directed payment where everyone gets a $2 increase,” he said. “In instances where you have contracts that exceed the new wage requirements, there will be less of an increase.” 

The median annual wage for home health and personal care aides is $31,893 on Long Island, according to state labor data, with experienced aides earning an average of $18.46 an hour.

Sen. Rachel May (D-Syracuse), sponsor of the original fair pay for home care workers legislation that failed to pass but instead was adopted in part in the governor’s budget, said the intent of increasing home care workers’ wages was to retain workers and grow the industry. Now, she said she’s concerned that if agencies aren’t given high enough rates, the wage increases run the risk of making a bad situation worse.

“The fact that the bill didn’t pass and got folded into the budget means a bunch of language we put in the bill to avoid this exact situation didn’t end up in law,” May said. “It’s the opposite of what we’re trying to accomplish here.”

The governor’s office said that due to financial measurements introduced through the Affordable Care Act, insurers handling Medicaid reimbursement cannot keep the money  passed through them.  Additionally, the state is encouraging home health agencies to report insufficient payments for wage increases to the Health Department.

The department will also “keep reiterating” its guidance on the matter with insurers to ensure compliance, the governor’s office said. 

May said she is now working to ensure that taxpayer dollars go to adequately funding agencies so they can pay their employees more. A major structural hurdle is that the reimbursement rates negotiated between insurance companies and agencies are not disclosed to the state, making it more difficult to determine whether insurance plans are paying high enough rates, she said.

“The biggest struggle we have is transparency,” May said. “We don’t know what the terms are of a lot of the contracts.”

Mildred Garcia-Gallery, 53, a consultant, home health aide and activist, said she worked with the New York Caring Majority — a coalition of aides, agencies and elected officials —aides to campaign for higher wages in the industry and reimbursement rates to support them.

After hearing about the state’s plans to adopt a higher wage early this year, she was ecstatic. Now, she said she worries whether higher costs for agencies will mean fewer hours for workers.

“It felt like a slap in the face,” said Garcia-Gallery, who’s worked in home care for 30 years and consults with agencies through her firm Ageless Companions LLC.

She said if agencies are forced to cut hours for workers, then aides won’t be able to earn the overtime pay they need to make ends meet, resulting in picking up work with additional agencies to get by. 

“I could find another job but what about these patients? If we exit, what happens?” she said. “It’s a job that I love. But loving it and surviving off of it are two separate things.”

Officials representing unionized aides said they have heard of plans paying rates too low to cover the increased costs, but also said some agencies are more concerned about profit than the wages of their workforce.

“We don’t always agree with the employers and we sometimes think they keep too much of the funding themselves,” said Helen Schaub, political director for 1199SEIU, the union representing 53,000 home care workers in the state, including 5,000 on Long Island. “You have to look agency by agency.”

Schaub said while the wage increase is good for workers, the ultimate problem is that for-profit insurance firms are involved in the Medicaid reimbursement process at all, instead of rates being negotiated directly with the state.

“What has been happening is that the state puts in money at the top and there’s this finger pointing between the employer and plans about who is keeping the money,” she said. 

 The $17 minimum applies to   home health workers on Long Island, in Westchester and in New York City. In other parts of the state, where the minimum for most workers is $13.20, the minimum for aides has gone up to $15.20. Home care workers across the state are scheduled to receive another $1 increase next October.

Winsome Gayle Allen, 58, said the sometimes-challenging work of caring for patients at home has been a personal calling for 40 years.

“The type of work where I feel comfortable is giving my time to elderly people,” said Gayle Allen, of Hollis, Queens, an aide with Fresh Meadows-based Reliance Senior Living Services.

Gayle Allen, who’s been serving patients in New York since moving to the states from Jamaica with her parents at 19, said she’s developed long-lasting relationships with patients and their families.

While she loves what she does, she admits the work can be difficult at times and requires a lot of empathy and patience. Given the demanding hours and low wages, she said workers are in dire need of pay increases above what’s currently being offered.  

“I’m not going to beat around the bush…I think we should get a starting pay of $20 an hour,” she said.

Christine Cipriani, 91, of South Garden City said she doesn’t know what she’d do if she didn’t have the support of her regular home care aide Mildred Garcia-Gallery.

“It’s vital for me,” Cipriani said. “My kids are very nice kids, but they have their own stuff to worry about.”

Cipriani said Garcia-Gallery first came into her life three years ago when the aide was looking after her husband until he died a year ago. “She’s like part of my family,” she said.

For Garcia-Gallery, helping Cipriani and other patients fills her with a sense of purpose and comes with emotional rewards.

“I like being needed and having that responsibility,” she said. “We like to do this job because we like to care for people, we love people and we love making people’s lives better or at least trying to.”

Still, she said, while the work “makes me feel important, it doesn’t mean my pay reflects that.”

For Thomas McCarthy, 24, a wheelchair user living in Farmingdale, having access to reliable home care gives him the opportunity to be more independent, he said.

“With just me and my aide helping me out, I’m not so dependent,” said McCarthy, who has Duchenne muscular dystrophy, a condition that progressively weakens muscles over time.

His aide, Marc Bazile, 52 — who lives in McCarthy’s family home every other week to provide round-the-clock care — said the work he does helping others makes him feel good and helps him appreciate the independence he has in his own life.

“I love family. I love to help people,” said Bazile, an aide with Ideal Home Care Services, who commutes from Lancaster, Pennsylvania every other week to assist McCarthy.

Still, Bazile said, pay remains an issue. As an experienced aide already making more than minimum wage, he said he hasn’t seen any impact from the recent $2-an-hour pay increase. 

— with Coralie Saint-Louis

Posted on

MCOs (NC)- Study: Medicaid transition still facing problems

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Punchline- the challenges are par for the course according to researchers, and the switch actually went really well for the majority of Medicaid members.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.northcarolinahealthnews.org/2022/12/07/study-finds-medicaid-managed-care-transition-still-impacted-by-poor-communication-patient-confusion-and-administrative-burden/

When North Carolina swapped its Medicaid system from a program run by the state to a program run and managed by five insurance companies, researchers at the Urban Institute — a D.C.-based think tank — took note. Among other policies, the organization’s researchers took a look at how transitions to Medicaid managed care impact patients nationwide.

In October, they released a report on North Carolina’s transition so far. They found that the initial transition didn’t lead to disruptions in primary care for most people. Nonetheless, the change still came with plenty of problems: providers didn’t enroll with all of the managed care plans because of the added administrative burden, patients were confused about what exactly the transition meant for them, and some people even ended up with big bills after mistakenly going to out-of-network providers. 

 
 

“What we found in North Carolina is pretty consistent with experiences in other states that have a transition to Medicaid managed care,” said Urban Institute researcher Eva Allen. “Any changes tend to bring some sort of amount of confusion and challenges for providers and for patients.”

For their analysis, Allen and her colleagues interviewed state Medicaid officials, staff from the insurance plans, provider groups, and advocates and conducted focus groups with Medicaid patients. 

The program’s main success is that, according to the report, about 97 percent of people who were auto-enrolled in a plan were able to keep seeing the same primary care provider after the switch to managed care. Officials attributed that success to an algorithm that used previous Medicaid claims to put patients in a plan that their current doctors had joined.  

Things didn’t go as smoothly afterward. 

Communication issues

Even though the majority of people who were automatically enrolled in a plan were able to keep seeing their primary care doctor, there were still other reasons people might need to switch plans: to keep seeing certain specialists, to make sure all their kids were on the same plan, etc. NC Health News has previously reported that some Medicaid patients who tried to navigate this process said it was excessively complicated and they struggled to find help. 

Also, once patients were put on a plan, a care manager from the managed care organization was supposed to reach out to them. But none of the participants in the researchers’ focus groups reported receiving any such communication. 

Part of the care management process is supposed to include screening for other unmet needs, such as housing or food. 

“Though screening for unmet social needs is reportedly a priority for the state and among plans,” the researchers wrote, “little information was available in spring 2022 about the extent to which and how screenings are being conducted or whether plans and providers are using NCCARE360, an online platform, to connect members to resources.” 

The state Department of Health and Human Services said that all of the managed care organizations “are expected” to screen patients for unmet social needs and offer care coordination, but there aren’t standardized rules that determine how the managed care companies do so.

There’s another part of the state’s Medicaid transformation — the Healthy Opportunities Pilot — which is tasked with addressing unmet needs for some Medicaid patients in a handful of rural counties. The administration of that program is different, but it has seen similar problems with the referral process, as NC Health News has previously reported

More like private insurance than Medicaid 

Participants also noted all the ways in which the new system looks and acts much more like private insurance, rather than Medicaid. In the old system, there was no such thing as in-network and out-of-network providers — doctors either took Medicaid, or they didn’t. Also, providers never had to submit requests for prior authorization for certain services, and patients knew which of their medications would be covered at the pharmacy.

After the switch, that all got more complicated. Some patients reported having to pay high costs at the pharmacy for medication they’d been on for years, and others said they had to wait for care that they’d received before without issue because the insurance company hadn’t yet told their doctor if they could do it and get paid for it. 

 
 

All those changes also contributed to providers’ hesitation to enroll with all the plans. Whereas before, they had one plan to work with — the state Medicaid system — now providers had six. Providers anticipated higher administrative costs and burdens, and many chose to only enroll with some of the plans, all issues NC Health News has previously covered. Some of their fears felt founded, as many had to wait weeks to receive payment due to paperwork issues. 

Needing to bill six systems instead of one is an issue that providers repeatedly bemoan. DHHS said it anticipated this problem and that the managed care companies have created a committee “made up of providers and plans who focus on reducing the administrative burdens on providers when working with so many plans.”

The administrative burden is something that almost always arises during the transition to managed care. “Unfortunately,” Allen said, “I am really not aware of any good examples of other states where the state was able to figure out how to make this a better system. It is inherently challenging.”

Incorrectly switching from Medicaid direct to managed care plans

While all of those issues added up to significant burdens for patients and providers, one of the largest single issues the researchers document is how around 7,500 people with significant mental health needs moved onto managed care plans, even though they shouldn’t have. These people were supposed to stay on the state-run Medicaid program until tailored plans aimed at people with significant behavioral health issues roll out (now slated for April 2023). 

Once those people moved onto the managed care plans, they lost many of the services they needed and the state had to switch them back. What confused researchers and advocates was why these patients were even offered the option to switch when it meant losing access to the care they needed. 

“It’s puzzling to me that the state provided this as an option when it was not in the best interest of the beneficiary,” Allen said. 

Medicaid patients in general have questioned who this new system benefits. In the focus groups “some participants reported that with health plans they have a new worry that services they or their children need will be denied. 

“Some wondered why the state decided to implement a more complex system when Medicaid Direct was working well in their experience,” the researchers wrote.

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Close window X

Republish this article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

As of late 2019, we’re changing our policy about reprinting our content.

You are free to use NC Health News content under the following conditions:

 

  • You can copy and paste this html tracking code into articles of ours that you use, this little snippet of code allows us to track how many people read our story.
  • Please do not reprint our stories without our bylines, and please include a live link to NC Health News under the byline, like this:

    By Jane Doe


    North Carolina Health News


     
  • Finally, at the bottom of the story (whether web or print), please include the text:

    North Carolina Health News is an independent, non-partisan, not-for-profit, statewide news organization dedicated to covering all things health care in North Carolina. Visit NCHN at northcarolinahealthnews.org. (on the web, this can be hyperlinked)

Study finds Medicaid managed care transition still impacted by poor communication, patient confusion and administrative burden

by Clarissa Donnelly-DeRoven, North Carolina Health News
December 7, 2022

1

Posted on

TECH- CMS Proposes Rule to Expand Access to Health Information and Improve the Prior Authorization Process

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: CMS wants everybody (ok most) to do lots of new stuff around prior auths.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/cms-proposes-rule-expand-access-health-information-and-improve-prior-authorization-process

As part of the Biden-Harris Administration’s ongoing commitment to increasing health data exchange and investing in interoperability, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed rule that would improve patient and provider access to health information and streamline processes related to prior authorization for medical items and services. CMS proposes to modernize the health care system by requiring certain payers to implement an electronic prior authorization process, shorten the time frames for certain payers to respond to prior authorization requests, and establish policies to make the prior authorization process more efficient and transparent. The rule also proposes to require certain payers to implement standards that would enable data exchange from one payer to another payer when a patient changes payers or has concurrent coverage, which is expected to help ensure that complete patient records would be available throughout patient transitions between payers.

“CMS is committed to strengthening access to quality care and making it easier for clinicians to provide that care,” said CMS Administrator Chiquita Brooks-LaSure. “The prior authorization and interoperability proposals we are announcing today would streamline the prior authorization process and promote health care data sharing to improve the care experience across providers, patients, and caregivers – helping us to address avoidable delays in patient care and achieve better health outcomes for all.”

The proposed rule would address challenges with the prior authorization process faced by providers and patients. Proposals include requiring implementation of a Health Level 7® (HL7®) Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources® (FHIR®) standard Application Programming Interface (API) to support electronic prior authorization. They also include requirements for certain payers to include a specific reason when denying requests, publicly report certain prior authorization metrics, and send decisions within 72 hours for expedited (i.e., urgent) requests and seven calendar days for standard (i.e., non-urgent) requests, which is twice as fast as the existing Medicare Advantage response time limit. In order to further support a streamlined prior authorization process, this proposed rule would add a new Electronic Prior Authorization measure for eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals under the Medicare Promoting Interoperability Program and for Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) eligible clinicians under the Promoting Interoperability performance category.

Proposed policies in this rule would also enable improved access to health data, supporting higher-quality care for patients with fewer disruptions. These policies include: expanding the current Patient Access API to include information about prior authorization decisions; allowing providers to access their patients’ data by requiring payers to build and maintain a Provider Access FHIR API, to enable data exchange from payers to in-network providers with whom the patient has a treatment relationship; and creating longitudinal patient records by requiring payers to exchange patient data using a Payer-to-Payer FHIR API when a patient moves between payers or has concurrent payers.

These proposed requirements would generally apply to Medicare Advantage (MA) organizations, state Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) agencies, Medicaid managed care plans, CHIP managed care entities, and Qualified Health Plan (QHP) issuers on the Federally-facilitated Exchanges (FFEs), promoting alignment across coverage types. CMS estimates that efficiencies introduced through these policies would save physician practices and hospitals over $15 billion over a 10-year period.

Finally, the proposed rule includes five requests for information related to standards for social risk factor data, the electronic exchange of behavioral health information among behavioral health providers, improving the exchange of medical documentation between certain providers in the Medicare Fee-for-Service program, advancing the Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA), and the role interoperability can play in improving maternal health outcomes.

The proposed rule is aligned with CMS’ ongoing work to strengthen patient access to care, reduce administrative burden for clinicians so they can focus on direct care, and support interoperability across the health care landscape. It withdraws and replaces the previous proposed rule, published in December 2020, and addresses public comments received on that proposed rule.

For additional information, consult this fact sheet.

The proposed rule is available to review here , and the deadline to submit comments is March 13, 2023. CMS encourages comments from all interested members of the public and, in particular, from patients and their families, providers, clinicians, consumer advocates, health care professional associations, individuals serving and located in underserved communities, and from all other CMS stakeholders serving populations facing disparities in health and health care.

For more information on the CMS proposed rule, please visit: https://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/guidance/interoperability/index.

###

Posted on

OP-ED (SDoH)- How Medicaid mission creep undermines real health care

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: A neurosurgeon takes a crack at using Medicaid to address SDoH.

 
 

Clipped from: https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/3759675-how-medicaid-mission-creep-undermines-real-health-care/

 
 

iStock

Most doctors, myself included, know that a patient’s zip code predicts his or her life expectancy. National life expectancy would undoubtedly climb with less poverty and more low-cost nutritious food, stable housing, sanitation and exercise. But it’s a mistake to assume the health care system can fix these societal issues.

The federal government wants Medicaid to ameliorate “social determinants of health” (SDOH). Unfortunately, using an agency designed to finance medical care for the poor to instead address a broad range of complex social problems has led to “mission creep.” It’s simply not feasible.

For example, in a recent roadmap from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), states are tasked with addressing “social, economic, and environmental factors that affect the health outcomes of Medicaid and CHIP populations.” Programs should seek to improve “access to nutritious food, affordable and accessible housing, quality education, and opportunities for meaningful employment.” That’s asking a lot of a financing program.

Some states are eager to oblige. New York recently proposed using Medicaid to remove health obstacles such as “poverty, discrimination, and their consequences, including powerlessness and a lack of access to good jobs with fair pay, quality education and housing, safe environments, and health care.” California’s new CalAIM project provides housing support and employment assistance for Medicaid beneficiaries. The actual provision of health care seems almost an afterthought.

These proposals are like trying to boil the ocean. New York’s states that Medicaid should account for “all the physical and behavioral health and social factors impacting a patient.” There are already many government departments with large budgets specifically tasked with these things. Every listed SDOH already has its own federal and state-level government agency.

Simply because someone’s housing affects their life expectancy doesn’t mean a department of housing and urban development should become subservient to Medicaid, or that they must duplicate efforts. Coordination, not duplication, is what’s needed.

Patients sign up for health insurance to see a doctor when they get sick, not for a voucher for the farmers’ market. The U.S. health care system does the “taking care of sick patients” part pretty well. It’s not responsible for the country’s poor life expectancy. We excel in treating major illnesses, cancers and traumas.

Mission creep will unintentionally damage the very areas in which U.S. health care excels. A ballooning bureaucracy already includes an ever-increasing number of employees (largely administrators) to treat the same number of patients. Asking doctors, hospitals and Medicaid administrators to tackle employment, housing, education, discrimination and the environment will only make things more difficult, especially with an underfunded and overstretched Medicaid.

Medicaid’s growth is already unsustainable, having covered just 6.8 percent of the population in 1970 and over 25 percent in 2020 (consuming 3.3 percent of GDP). Additionally, Medicaid takes up an average of 16 percent of state budgets. These numbers pre-date the COVID-19 pandemic, which has seen a surge in enrollment and expenditure.

Mission creep also means more metric fixation. The so-called “value-based payment” (VBP) has been infiltrating medicine for over a decade now, and CMS now encourages it to address social factors. Intended to reward providers for quality care, VBP has proven rife with unintended consequences, such as worsened mortality from institutions attempting to meet statistical benchmarks. 

The U.S. government has already spent $1.3 billion developing metrics, and physician practices spend $15 billion annually reporting them. Institutions also spend money to game the metrics, so much that recorded “improvements” have been exposed as byproducts of coding risk adjustment. This ends up helping the most well-resourced institutions, while hospitals serving low-income patients fare the worst.

There are better ways to spend Medicaid’s scarce resources.

Start with payment parity. Compared to private insurance, Medicaid reimburses providers for treating its patients with pennies on the dollar. Those signing up for Medicaid seek access to doctors, nurses, hospitals and therapists. Underpaying providers undermines this access. Reimbursing frontline health care workers at a level showing the government’s commitment to Medicaid patients, rather than spending on other agencies’ responsibilities, must be the priority.

Second, instead of arbitrary metrics, Medicaid should put in place programs prioritizing patient choice. Over 75 percent of Medicaid beneficiaries have annual health care expenditures under $7,000. These low-cost patients could be covered by the private insurance market with relatively inexpensive subsidies or vouchers. 

In a highly competitive market with more financing options, these relatively healthy patients could choose a plan that addresses their individual needs. Some plans might even offer SDOH coverage. Letting patients choose whether their voucher dollars go toward SDOH is much more equitable than the forced approach.

Medicaid mission creep must be reversed. The system is already stretched thin. Low payment rates drive away providers. Increasing the burden on the program will make matters worse. Reform should come by prioritizing patient choice and bottom-up solutions. That is the true road to equity.

Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA, is a neurosurgeon, assistant professor at the University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine and the author of upcoming research for the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. He is also affiliated faculty at the Institute for Health Policy Studies at UCSF.  Follow him on Twitter @DrDiGiorgio.

Posted on

FWA (MA)- Two Individuals Charged With Defrauding MassHealth by Billing for Services Not Provided

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Parisella and Martel used false time sheets for personal care attendant and applied behavioral therapy services to the same relative.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.mass.gov/news/two-individuals-charged-with-defrauding-masshealth-by-billing-for-services-not-provided

SALEM — Two individuals have been charged in connection with a scheme to fraudulently bill MassHealth, the state Medicaid program, for personal care attendant (PCA) and applied behavioral analysis (ABA) services that were never provided, Attorney General Maura Healey announced today.

Jessica Parisella, 42, of Danvers, was indicted Monday by an Essex County Grand Jury on charges of Medicaid False Claims and Larceny over $1,200. Board Certified Behavior Analyst and Licensed Mental Health Counselor Donald Martel, 67, of Georgetown, was also indicted on charges of Medicaid False Claims and Larceny over $1,200. The two defendants are set to be arraigned on January 24 in Essex Superior Court.

The MassHealth PCA program helps people with chronic or long-term disabilities live independently in the community by providing medically necessary physical assistance with personal care needs. Through the consumer-driven MassHealth PCA program, eligible MassHealth members employ PCAs to assist them with their activities of daily living. These services are paid for by MassHealth through a fiscal intermediary.

ABA services are prescribed therapies provided to people with Autism Spectrum Disorder. MassHealth covers ABA therapy to children under age 21; the treatments include professional, counseling, and guidance services that are necessary to develop, maintain, and restore, to the maximum extent practicable, the functioning of an individual.

The AG’s Office alleges that both defendants defrauded MassHealth in a scheme related to Parisella’s relative, a MassHealth member. Parisella was indicted for stealing from MassHealth by submitting fraudulent PCA timesheets, as the surrogate for her relative. Martel was indicted for defrauding MassHealth by submitting fraudulent claims indicating he had provided ABA services to Parisella’s relative. At the time of the alleged fraudulent billing, Parisella’s relative was inpatient at a hospital or incarcerated, and thus unable to receive MassHealth services.

The AG’s Office began its investigation into Martel after a referral from the Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services.

The AG’s investigation and indictments follow years of efforts by AG Healey’s Medicaid Fraud Division to combat fraud and misconduct in the PCA program. In addition to securing indictments against seven individuals in a coordinated criminal sweep of fraud and abuse in the state’s PCA program in October 2020, the Division indicted a New Bedford man in July 2021 who allegedly defrauded the program by falsely billing for services he did not receive. In March 2022, four individuals were charged with a scheme to falsely bill the PCA program for services that conflicted with outside employment. In June and September 2022, a Medford man and Lowell man were found guilty and sentenced to jail in separate cases for defrauding MassHealth for PCA services not rendered. Earlier this week, the Division announced charges against two defendants for fraudulent billing for PCA services and sex-related crimes against PCAs.

This case is being investigated and prosecuted by Assistant Attorney General William Champlin and Senior Healthcare Fraud Investigator Heather Dwyer of the AG’s Medicaid Fraud Division. MassHealth, Massachusetts Behavioral Health Partnership, Tempus Unlimited, and the Essex County Sheriff’s Department provided substantial assistance with the investigation.

The Massachusetts Medicaid Fraud Division receives 75 percent of its funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under a grant award totaling $5,542,963 for Federal fiscal year 2023. The remaining 25 percent, totaling $1,847,641 for FY 2023, is funded by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

###

Posted on

FWA (NJ)- Opioid Abuse Treatment Facility to Pay $3.15 Million for Kickback Violations, Obstructing Federal Audit, and False Claims Submitted to Government Insurance Programs

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: 2 companies worked together to maximize reimbursement for methadone mixing services.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.justice.gov/usao-nj/pr/opioid-abuse-treatment-facility-pay-315-million-kickback-violations-obstructing-federal

CAMDEN, N.J. – An opioid abuse treatment facility in Camden will pay a total of $3.15 million to resolve criminal and civil claims that it caused kickbacks, obstructed a federal audit, and fraudulently billed Medicaid, Attorney for the United States Vikas Khanna announced today. 

Camden Treatment Associates LLC (CTA) agreed to pay $1.5 million in criminal penalties to resolve allegations that it violated the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and obstructed a Medicaid audit. As part of the resolution, a criminal information was filed on December 2, 2022 in Camden federal court charging CTA with this conduct. CTA entered into a three-year deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) that requires it to abide by certain measures to avoid conviction.  CTA also entered into a civil settlement agreement to pay $1.65 million to the United States to resolve claims that it violated the federal False Claims Act by submitting fraudulent claims to Medicaid. 

Criminal Resolution

According to CTA’s admissions in the DPA:

Between 2009 and 2015, CTA and a second company were owned and managed by related parties. CTA had a kickback relationship with the second company in which CTA ordered all of its methadone mixing services from the second company and paid it more than $125,300 for those services. This arrangement resulted in kickbacks being paid because the second company paid the profits it made on CTA’s orders of methadone mixing to the related parties who owned and managed both companies. As a result, CTA was induced to order services from the second company and to have CTA patients receive treatment using methadone mixed only by that company. CTA received more than $2.78 million from Medicaid for methadone administration services. 

In a separate criminal scheme, CTA obstructed a Medicaid contractor’s 2016 audit of CTA’s claims for payment. CTA submitted falsified materials to the auditor purporting to justify its claims to Medicaid. Specifically, CTA added patient and counselor signatures to patient files, altered names of counselors listed as providing services, added credentials for staff listed as performing services, added sign-off dates for services and, in some instances, submitted entire patient notes to files to justify services rendered. Metadata from CTA’s electronic patient software program revealed that CTA employed these fraudulent means. 

Civil Resolution

The settlement resolves the civil allegations that CTA submitted false claims to Medicaid stemming from the kickback relationship with the methadone mixing company described above. The settlement further resolves allegations that between 2013 and 2016, CTA failed to comply with certain federal and state regulations governing substance abuse treatment facilities.  Specifically, CTA allegedly failed to maintain proper supervision and staffing at its facility. Instead, CTA typically used non-credentialed “counselor interns” to perform services at the facility and did not have sufficient licensed staff to properly supervise the interns. Consequently, CTA’s claims submitted to Medicaid for payment, which were contingent on CTA’s certified compliance with these regulations, were false.

The claims settled by this agreement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.

Compliance Obligations

As part of the DPA, CTA is required to adopt several compliance measures, including:

  • have an effective compliance program, including enhanced compliance policies and annual compliance training regarding federal health care laws;

 
 

  • retain an independent health care compliance consulting firm specializing in substance abuse disorder facilities to conduct a comprehensive review of its compliance program and to make improvement recommendations;

 
 

  • create an independent board of advisors to oversee company compliance relating to federal health care laws;

 
 

  • have a chief compliance officer to oversee compliance-related functions at the company;

 
 

  • annually certify that its compliance program is effective; and

 
 

  • provide written reports to the United States every six months over a three-year period detailing its progress in developing and enhancing its compliance program.

 
 

Attorney for the United States Khanna credited agents of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, under the direction of Acting Special Agent in Charge Susan Frisco, with the investigation and prosecution of the case. He also thanked the FBI Health Care Fraud Unit Data Analysis Response Team at FBI Headquarters in Washington, D.C., under the direction of Special Agent Greg Heeb; IRS-Criminal Investigation, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Tammy Tomlins in Newark; and the FBI’s South Jersey Resident Agency, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Jacqueline Maguire in Philadelphia, for their assistance with the case. 

The criminal case was prosecuted by Acting Chief of the Health Care Fraud Unit Christina O. Hud, Chief of the Opioid Abuse Prevention and Enforcement Unit R. David Walk, Jr., and Assistant U.S. Attorney Diana V. Carrig of the Criminal Division in Camden. The civil case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Kruti Dharia of the Opioid Abuse Prevention and Enforcement Unit and Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew A. Caffrey III of the District of Massachusetts and formerly of the District of New Jersey.