Posted on

As Hospitals Consolidate, Medicaid Patients Have Fewer Options

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: When hospitals acquire other hospitals to increase revenues and profits, somehow Medicaid member access gets even worse. Wonders never cease.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://revcycleintelligence.com/news/as-hospitals-consolidate-medicaid-patients-have-fewer-options

A new research brief finds Medicaid admissions decline as hospital markets get more concentrated, but hospitals question the analysis.

 
 

Source: Getty Images

September 28, 2023 – Access to care for Medicaid patients declines as hospital markets become more concentrated following mergers and acquisitions, a new research brief from the National Institute for Health Care Management (NIHCM) Foundation suggests.

The research brief finds the average hospital reduced admissions for Medicaid patients when markets became more concentrated. The finding indicates potential limitations on access to care for lower-income individuals, says lead researcher and health economist Sunita Desai, PhD, of the New York University School of Medicine.

Desai analyzed data between 2006 and 2012 from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases for New York State, the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, and data on hospital mergers.

The average hospital’s measure of market concentration increased by 7 percent during that time, Desai reports. With every 1 percent increase in a hospital-specific measure of concentration, there was a 0.59 percent decline in all Medicaid admissions and, specifically, a 1.3 percent decline in birth admissions. The study analyzes births separately, as they account for the most frequent Medicaid admissions.

“Policymakers and regulators should consider potential impacts on care and access for Medicaid patients when reviewing mergers or developing policy responses to hospital concentration,” Desai writes. “Moreover, given Medicaid patients are more likely to go to public hospitals, investments in the public hospital systems may be warranted in response to growing market concentration.”

Non-profit hospitals are particularly impacted by hospital market concentration with greater consolidation associated with a decline in Medicaid volume for non-profit organizations. Meanwhile, Medicaid volume increased for public hospitals, according to the research brief.

The finding suggests that non-profit hospitals are not necessarily investing increased profits they receive from higher commercial reimbursement rates into care for low-income populations that require a safety net, the research brief explains. Hospitals generally receive 90 cents for every dollar they spend on treating Medicaid patients, significantly less than what they receive for treating commercially insured patients.

The American Hospital Association (AHA), however, claims the research brief is a “bias-riddled ‘study'” that deflects from the effects payer concentration has on access to care.

“Instead of continuing to myopically focus on the hospital field, researchers should look at broader factors, like how commercial health insurers dominate every market in the U.S. and use that market power for their own enrichment,” Melinda Hatton, AHA’s general counsel and secretary, says in a statement.

“This market domination often comes at the expense of patients. Government reports confirm that some commercial health insurers leverage their market power to put in place policies that delay or deny patient care, inappropriately withhold reimbursement to providers and burn out doctors and nurses,” Hatton continues.

AHA-published research has linked hospital mergers and acqusitions to increased access to high-quality care.

Posted on

Arizona’s Medicaid program isn’t giving suspected fraudsters due process, critics say

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Some providers are getting caught in the crossfire as the state tries to deal with the humanitarian crisis / fallout from the sober homes fraud last year.

 
 

Stephanie Innes

Arizona Republic

View Comments

The number of people publicly criticizing Arizona’s Medicaid fraud crackdown appears to be growing and protesters say they won’t stop until state leaders address their concerns.

About 60 people, carrying signs with slogans such as “All Tribes Lives Matter” and “Our Struggle Is Real,” gathered Tuesday in front of the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System offices at 801 E. Jefferson St. in Phoenix on to criticize the way the agency has responded to rampant fraud involving its American Indian Health Program.

A much smaller group of protesters gathered a week ago in front of the state health department.

State officials have said the fraud involved fake behavioral health clinics billing the state for services they never provided and that the clinics preyed on Indigenous people struggling with substance use disorder.

In some cases, clinics in the Valley were using white vans to kidnap people from indigenous reservations and take them to bogus treatment facilities, sometimes holding them against their will, investigators have said.

Navajo Nation President Buu Nygren on June 20 declared the fraud a humanitarian crisis on the Operation Rainbow Bridge Facebook page. The fraud reportedly spread to tribes in other states, including Montana, where the Blackfeet Nation in August declared an emergency over the scam, the Associated Press reported.

The Navajo Nation launched Operation Rainbow Bridge to help people who were caught up in the scams get home or find the services they need.

 
 

But critics say that the state’s effort to punish fraudsters and prevent more theft of taxpayer dollars has caused an increase in homelessness and unemployment, and left some people without the treatment they need. At least 102 providers were suspended from the AHCCCS program in May, and others have since been suspended in connection with the alleged fraud.

Patients are suffering and in some cases are dying because they aren’t getting the help they need, said Ashley Adams, an attorney who attended the protest. She said she is representing some of the providers who have either been suspended or otherwise harmed by the state crackdown.

“The bad actors set the tone for everyone else,” Adams said. “Anyone who got into this business at a certain time is assumed to be bad … (AHCCCS) is not doing investigations, they are not interviewing employees or looking at records. They are making assumptions.”

A big part of the problem, Adams said, is that much of the fraud began during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, when demand for behavioral health and substance use disorder treatment was increasing and the health system in general was trying to improve access for patients.

But the state’s response after discovering the scam clinics and money loss was to have a “knee-jerk reaction” and now all providers of services through the American Indian Health Program are assumed to be fraudulent, she said.

 
 

“There are solutions to be found aside from suspending everybody,” she said. “They are suspending providers that were doing good work.”

Protest organizer André Miller, a pastor, mayoral candidate and behavioral health provider from Mesa, said his group is trying to meet with Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs to outline its concerns but that so far they’ve bene unable to to secure any of her time. Hobbs’ office did not respond Tuesday to a request for comment. Miller said his group will continue its public protests until state leaders respond.

Hobbs’ office issued a statement last week when the protesters were outside the Arizona Department of Health Services that said her administration “has worked relentlessly to crack down on fraud, protect taxpayer dollars and end the humanitarian crisis created by fraudulent sober living homes that have endangered some of Arizona’s most vulnerable.”

The statement emailed by Hobbs spokesperson Christian Slater said the administration has been working to get resources for those affected, “providing 13,700 nights of temporary lodging and transportation for over 750 people affected, and directly serving over 4,000 individuals.”

Investigators have said the scam primarily targeted indigenous Arizonans through the AHCCCS American Indian Health program, which allows providers to bill AHCCCS directly as fee-for-service rather than to managed care organizations, which is how most of the agency’s billing is handled.

Miller and some other providers say they they’ve been forced to fire employees, not because they were suspended, but because payments from AHCCCS are delayed because of extra checks and balances the agency put in place to prevent more fraud.

Audit faults state agency for poor foster care oversightDeveloper acquires 1,800 acres in this Arizona cityPhoenix Diocese establishes Arizona’s first, full-fledged seminaryTrump ally wrote subpoenas of Maricopa Co. election data

 
 

AHCCCS was allegedly bilked for “hundreds of millions of dollars,” Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes announced in May at a multi-agency news conference led by Hobbs. The scam was a “stunning failure of government,” Mayes said at the time.

Newfound Hope Wellness & Detox Center in Tempe, which serves primarily indigenous patients, was suspended from AHCCCS payments in February because of suspected fraud, though the owners, who attended Tuesday’s protest, say there’s no evidence any fraud occurred.

Tara Sutherland is living at a facility operated by Newfound Hope with her four children and is fearful that if the organization doesn’t get its provider suspension lifted soon, she’ll be without a place to live. Sutherland, 50, is Navajo and is getting help for substance use disorder involving drugs and alcohol. She and her children were homeless for two months in the spring after a sober living home where they were residing closed.

“We were living in my van and my car. We were parking here and there, maybe staying overnight at friends’ houses, it was hard,” Sutherland said. “Now they are starting in new schools and I don’t want them to keep transferring.”

AHCCCS officials on Tuesday did not have any comment other than to reiterate what they said last week, which is that the agency continues to investigate and suspend behavioral health providers for credible allegations of fraudulent billing, and that its top priority is the health and safety of enrolled members.

Reach health care reporter Stephanie Innes at stephanie.innes@gannett.com or at 480-313-3775. Follow her on X, formerly known as Twitter @stephanieinnes.

View Comments

 
 

From <https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona-health/2023/10/03/criticism-of-arizonas-medicaid-fraud-crackdown-is-growing/71051357007/>

 
 

Posted on

Molina loses anticipated Indiana Medicaid contract Dive

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Molina has a surprise Medicaid RFP loss due to challenges meeting DSNP requirements.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/molina-indiana-medicaid-contract-loss/695442/

An article from

 
 

The health insurer expected to be offered a contract to manage the care of Medicaid seniors in a new long-term services and supports program, but wasn’t able to stand up products in time.

 
 

Molina’s contract loss in Indiana is not expected to change the payer’s financial outlook. Gerenme via Getty Images

This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

Dive Brief:

  • Molina will not be offered a Medicaid contract from Indiana that the payer expected to receive, after it was tied up in regulatory red tape, Molina disclosed on Monday in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  • Indiana’s long-term services and supports contract required the health insurer to have a dual-eligible special needs plan available for 2024, but Molina wasn’t able to stand the product up in time because of CMS administrative requirements, according to the filing.
  • The regulatory requirements shouldn’t affect any of Molina’s other current or pending Medicaid contracts, the payer said. Molina still expects to bring in 2024 premium revenue around $38 billion.
  •  
  •  

Indiana’s Pathways for Aging is a new program meant to help seniors on Medicaid receive long-term care in a home and community-based setting. Long-term services and supports programs offer a variety of medical and social services to people who need help with daily activities because of age, disability or chronic illness.

The state is awarding contracts to managed care organizations before Pathways launches in 2024. Molina, along with Elevance, Humana and UnitedHealthcare, was supposed to receive a contract to manage beneficiaries’ care in the new program.

However, the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration notified Molina in late September that it wouldn’t receive the contract to participate in Pathways. Molina said it would have had a DSNP product available by 2025, but Indiana already determined that Molina hadn’t met readiness review requirements.

The contract was expected to run for four years, with the potential for two one-year renewal terms. Pathways, when launched, will cover roughly 100,000 qualifying Hoosiers.

“Indiana is the only state in its portfolio in which a Medicaid contract, whether actual or expected, has been affected by the CMS administrative proceeding,” Molina said in the filing, adding that the contract loss would not be material to the payer’s financials.

Molina did not respond to a request for comment on what CMS requirements held up its DSNP launch.

The contract loss comes after recent Medicaid wins for Molina in California, Iowa and Nebraska, which should collectively add more than $4 billion in annual premium revenue for Molina and offset the worst of member losses from Medicaid redeterminations, according to management.

“While the Indiana development is slightly disappointing, we remain bullish on [Molina] given the substantial amount of new business won over the last year,” JP Morgan analyst Calvin Sternick wrote in a note Monday.

Posted on

New Hampshire seeking Medicaid contract bids

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: The Granite State fires up the MCO RFP machine, with contracts going live in September 2024.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.beckerspayer.com/contracting/new-hampshire-seeking-medicaid-contract-bids.html

New Hampshire is looking for payers to administer its Medicaid managed care program starting next year.

The state said in early September it expects to select three insurers to administer benefits starting Sept. 1, 2024 through Aug. 31, 2029.

Those selected will administer Medicaid benefits to up to 190,000 enrollees under the age of 65, including acute care, behavioral health and pharmacy services.

“Respondents are expected to identify ways in which they will meet or exceed MCM Program

requirements and goals by offering innovative strategies for building on authentic patient/provider relationships with an emphasis on primary care prevention and provider-delivered care coordination to effectively reduce future illness burden and improve population health in every county of the state,” the state wrote.

The state expects discussions with selected bidders to begin in late November, with final approval expected in January.

 

Subscribe to the following topics: new hampshiremedicaidmanaged careprograminsurers

Posted on

Centene lays off 3% of workforce

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: This story pins the layoffs on the wind-down. But the really question is: Did plans really staff up to handle the enrollment surge during the PHE? Was it hard to manage all those soft-ball rate cells?

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/centene-layoffs-medicaid-redeterminations-medicare-stars/694872/

An article from

 
 

The layoffs at Centene follow similar workforce reductions at CVS Health earlier this summer.

 
 

Samantha Liss for Healthcare Dive

This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

Dive Brief:

  • Centene is laying off 2,000 employees — a little over 3% of its workforce — as the health insurer struggles with headwinds from Medicaid redeterminations and Medicare Advantage star ratings.
  • The layoffs were confirmed to Healthcare Dive by a company spokesperson. Centene has recently sold off assets, including AI platform Apixio and UK unit Circle Health Group, to refocus on its core business.
  • Centene is the latest payer to undergo layoffs this year. In August, CVS announced it would lay off 5,000 employees, or 2% of its workforce, amid cost pressures integrating recent multi-billion-dollar acquisitions.

Dive Insight:

Health insurers brought in record profits during the pandemic as individuals delayed non-essential medical services, but some have stumbled this year amid pressures like normalizing utilization, regulatory changes in MA and states resuming Medicaid eligibility checks.

Payers with a heavy government presence like Centene and Molina are particularly exposed to headwinds in Medicare and Medicaid.

Centene, which contracts with 31 states to offer Medicaid coverage, is the largest Medicaid managed care organization in the U.S. Earlier this year, the payer lowered its 2024 earnings guidance due to expectations that Medicaid redeterminations will increase spending and lower premium revenue next year.

States could begin removing Medicaid beneficiaries from their rolls as early as April after resuming eligibility checks for the safety-net health insurance program.

Centene lost 262,700 Medicaid members from redeterminations in the second quarter, dropping its total Medicaid lives to just over 16 million.

Research firm Wolfe Research downgraded Centene in July, citing the impact of redeterminations along with concerns about the payer’s ability to improve its Medicare Advantage star ratings. Morgan Stanley also downgraded Centene in August, expressing similar concerns.

Centene is one of several payers that saw their star ratings, a measure of plan quality and member satisfaction that results in bonuses, fall for 2023, pressuring earnings targets. The St. Louis-based payer has taken a number of steps to improve its stars, including investing in provider enablement and focusing more on medically complex members, which management has said should help.

The CMS will release 2024 star ratings in October.

Health insurers aren’t the only healthcare companies that have turned to layoffs to cut costs in a difficult operating environment. Nonprofit hospital giant CommonSpirit laid off an undisclosed number of employees during its third quarter and 2,000 additional positions in its fourthWalgreens laid off 10% of its corporate workforce in May.

Physician enablement company Clover Health and doctor networking platform Doximity both laid off 10% of their employees earlier this year, while primary care chain Cano Health let 700 employees go over the summer.

Other companies that underwent layoffs this year include Oracle-owned EHR vendor Cerner, telehealth provider Teladoc, Google’s life sciences sister company Verily and testmaker Abbott.

Posted on

Casey Urges Medicaid Agency to Crack Down on Health Insurers Who Harm Patients by Denying Coverage of Medically Necessary Care

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Focus on MCO prior auth behaviors intensifies.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.casey.senate.gov/news/releases/casey-urges-medicaid-agency-to-crack-down-on-health-insurers-who-harm-patients-by-denying-coverage-of-medically-necessary-care

More than 67 million Americans receive Medicaid coverage from a managed care organization (MCO)

In letter, Casey raises concerns about health insurance companies routinely denying coverage of medically necessary care for people enrolled in Medicaid MCOs

Washington, D.C. Today, U.S. Senator Bob Casey (D-PA), Chairman of the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, sent a letter to Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Chiquita Brooks-LaSure seeking information about the oversight of Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs). In the letter, Chairman Casey raises concerns about health insurance companies routinely denying coverage of medically necessary care for people enrolled in Medicaid MCOs—an issue examined in recent watchdog reports that Casey previously requested. The letter seeks information about the steps CMS and states are taking are being taken to protect Medicaid enrollees and prevent MCOs from putting their bottom line ahead of the interests of patients seeking care.

“It is abundantly clear that MCO denials of coverage can negatively affect patients,” wrote Chairman Casey. “The Office of the Inspector General’s findings—coupled with the everyday experiences of my constituents in Pennsylvania—demonstrate more must be done so that older adults, people with disabilities, and children, all receive the care they need and deserve.”

State Medicaid programs pay health insurance companies a fixed annual fee, known as capitated payments, to operate MCOs that provide health insurance to Medicaid enrollees. MCOs have grown to become the dominant delivery system for health care coverage within the Medicaid program. More than 67 million people received full or partial Medicaid coverage from MCOs in 2020, accounting for 84 percent of enrollees.

In 2019, Chairman Casey sent a letter to the Office the Inspector General (OIG) calling for an investigation of whether patients enrolled in MCOs can successfully access the services to which they are entitled. Subsequently, OIG released a series of oversight reports issuing recommendations to MCOs, states, and CMS to address issues including repeated instances of improper service denials and failures to provide enrollees with information needed to file appeals. Today’s letter from Chairman Casey seeks additional information and data from CMS and urges the agency to implement OIG’s recommendations to ensure patients are not being denied care.

Senator Casey has a long record of fighting to protect and expand Medicaid. Earlier this month, Senator Casey introduced the Medicaid for Every Child Act, which would automatically enroll every child in Medicaid from birth until age 18. The bill would guarantee coverage for over 2.6 million children in Pennsylvania, including over 645,000 children in rural counties where health care has historically been more difficult to access.

Read the full letter here or below:

Dear Administrator Brooks-LaSure:

I write concerning recent independent watchdog reports that show health insurance companies routinely deny coverage of medically necessary care for people enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations (MCO). This month, the Office of Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services (OIG) released the last in a series of four reports examining improper MCO coverage denials. Conducted in response to my request, the OIG’s findings—coupled with the everyday experiences of my constituents in Pennsylvania—demonstrate more must be done so that older adults, people with disabilities, and children, all receive the care they need and deserve. Therefore, I am seeking information to ensure appropriate steps are taken to ensure MCOs are not putting their bottom line ahead of the interests of patients seeking care.

Operated by insurance companies, MCOs administer Medicaid benefits on behalf of states in exchange for fixed fees known as “capitated payments” that are based on the number of members enrolled in a given plan. Independent watchdogs have long expressed concern about the MCO model and the potential financial incentive for insurers to reduce costs by limiting payments and denying coverage.  In 2019, I asked OIG to examine whether patients enrolled in MCOs can successfully access the services to which they are entitled, and to review whether the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) was providing sufficient oversight to ensure enrollees receive the care they deserve. MCOs’ footprint has grown tremendously to become what CMS recently described as the “dominant delivery system” for Medicaid, providing full or partial health coverage to more than 67 million Americans, which accounts for 84 percent of Medicaid enrollees.

Following my request, OIG conducted a national evaluation of Medicaid MCOs that it published in July. OIG’s review examined 115 plans, each with at least 10,000 enrollees, that were spread across 37 states and operated by seven companies. OIG found that the MCOs it evaluated denied 12.5 percent of requests for prior authorization during the report’s 12-month review period in 2019. Denial rates varied from state to state, company to company, and plan to plan. For example, OIG found that one insurer operating plans in 13 states had denial rates ranging from 5 percent to 29 percent, and that denial rates for various MCOs in California ranged from 7 percent to 29 percent. OIG also found that 2.7 million people were enrolled in MCOs that denied 25 percent or more of claims. One Illinois plan denied 41 percent of claims, while two other plans—in Georgia, and Texas—denied one-third of claims, according to the OIG report.

OIG wrote that it was “unclear why some MCOs had rates of prior authorization denials that were so much higher than their peers,” but it is abundantly clear that improper coverage denials can negatively affect patients. The denied care included drug therapy, health screening services for children, and inpatient hospital services, according to OIG’s report. In one instance, OIG detailed how an MCO denied in-home skilled nursing care requested for a pediatric patient diagnosed with cystic fibrosis, Down syndrome, and a series of other medical conditions that required gastrostomy tube feeding and enzyme therapy several times a day. In another instance, OIG found that an MCO denied covering the replacement of a broken stairlift for a partially paralyzed 77-year-old enrollee, before overturning its decision more than six weeks later when the denial was appealed. OIG identified several issues contributing to improper denials, including “MCOs allowing inappropriate staff or inadequately trained staff to make decisions about whether to approve prior authorization requests, using incorrect criteria to determine whether to approve requests, and failure to request additional information before issuing decisions.” OIG raised further concern that improper denials disproportionately affect communities of color and low-income communities.

While the OIG’s data suggest that Pennsylvania’s MCOs have comparatively low denial rates compared to other states, Pennsylvanians enrolled in MCOs nonetheless experience difficulties with improper denials. For example, one Philadelphia resident who relies on in-home care to bathe, use the toilet, and go to medical appointments, reported that the stress of fighting their MCO over cuts to covered care in-home care exacerbates their existing physical illnesses. Providers and patient advocates in Pennsylvania cited multiple examples of patients whose health was put at risk when time-sensitive care was delayed by denials that can take weeks, months, and even years, to appeal.

One attorney who frequently represents Medicaid enrollees on behalf of the Pennsylvania Health Law Project (PHLP), a legal aid organization that represents clients across the Commonwealth, observed that clients with declining health often experience “fear or reluctance … to ask for additional services,” due to concern that doing so will limit their existing access to services. In a recent letter to Pennsylvania’s Medicaid agency, PHLP shared data showing multiple examples of people receiving at-home medical care whose service hours were cut when they sought additional care coverage. PHLP’s data also showed MCOs cut in-home personal assistance services that had been previously approved, absent any demonstrable improvement in patients’ health status. PHLP cited 43 patients covered by a single MCO whose personal assistance hours were cut by 25 percent or more over a five-month period, more than half of whom had assistance hours cut by at least 50 percent. One northeastern Pennsylvania resident had their care hours cut from 70 to 35 hours a week despite having had three heart attacks, while still recovering from a car accident. The patient had several other serious health conditions including chronic pain, an unhealed ankle fracture, arthritis in his back, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a hematoma on the brain, nerve damage, dizziness, vision impairment, borderline diabetes, memory loss, and depression.

At Temple University Hospital, where Medicaid is the payer for nearly half of its patients, medical staff raised concern about delays and denials when patients are seeking cancer diagnoses and treatment. Temple reported that MCOs initially deny about 40 percent of imaging tests for cancer patients, even though such measures are the standard of care. Roughly 80 percent of the initial denials by MCOs for imaging are overturned following first-level appeals involving nurses or second-level appeals involving physicians, strongly suggesting the tests should not have been denied in the first place. Temple also reported that more than 10 percent of chemotherapy treatments are initially denied by MCOs. According to the hospital, 85 percent of these denials are overturned following physician-to-physician consultations.

When patients are denied coverage of medically necessary services, they often face tight timelines to file actionable appeals. Assuming such appeals are filed in a timely manner, the process can be complicated and time-consuming, creating barriers that can make it difficult for Medicaid enrollees to seek recourse. In its national evaluation, OIG found that just one in nine MCO denials were appealed, even though 36 percent of those appeals were successful in the first round—indicating that the requested services were medically necessary and should not have been initially denied. Only two percent of the denials that were upheld in the first round of appeals were elevated to a second level of appeal, OIG reported. Moreover, OIG cited multiple examples of MCOs missing required timelines to make coverage decisions, and raised concern about MCOs failing to provide enrollees with proper information about their right to appeal. Such issues have the potential to further impede access to care for those most in need.

OIG warned that capitated payment models “can create an incentive for insurance companies to deny the authorization of services to increase profits,” and its work makes clear that the issues faced by Medicaid enrollees in Pennsylvania and across our Nation must be addressed. I appreciate CMS’s commitment to partner with states to strengthen the monitoring and oversight of MCOs. However, it is concerning that CMS did not provide concrete answers to OIG’s recommendations aimed at addressing issues identified in its report. As such, I request that you respond to the following questions no later than November 16, 2023:

  1. CMS uses robust oversight tools to evaluate Medicare Advantage coverage denials but does not require states to conduct similar oversight of MCOs, which have higher denial rates. Of the 37 states it reviewed, OIG found that 22 did not conduct regular appropriateness reviews of MCO denials, including 13 that did not conduct such reviews at all. An additional 15 states did not analyze MCO denial data. Based on these findings, OIG recommendations called on CMS to (a) require states to regularly review the appropriateness of a sample of MCO prior authorization denials; (b) require states to collect data on MCOs’ prior authorization decisions; and (c) require states to implement automatic external medical reviews of upheld MCO prior authorization denials. Please indicate whether CMS concurs with each of the recommendations, and the specific actions CMS plan to take to carry them out.

 
 

  1. In addition to lower rates of initial denials, OIG found that Medicare Advantage plans were more likely than MCOs to overturn denials at the first stage of the appeals process. OIG suggested that the difference may be due to Medicare Advantage plans having more robust appeals processes in place than MCOs, including the use of external medical reviews. What steps has CMS taken to ensure that MCOs provide more robust appeals processes to Medicaid enrollees, including, but not limited to, external medical reviews?

 
 

  1. An OIG audit released in December 2022 found that a Pennsylvania MCO sent denial letters that failed to inform recipients of their right to a state “fair hearing.” OIG determined the omission was due to the Pennsylvania Medicaid agency removing language that informed enrollees of this right from a notice template that MCOs are required to use. OIG also identified inaccurate appeals information in denial letters sent to enrollees by an MCO operating in Iowa. While the OIG’s audits indicated the issues in both states had been resolved in response to its recommendations, such omissions and misstatements mean that enrollees may not have information necessary to understand their rights and options within the appeals process. Has CMS taken steps to ensure that all Medicaid enrollees are receiving accurate and accessible information about their right to appeal denials?

 
 

  1. States have the authority to take corrective measures and levy fines when MCOs fail to follow requirements set out by the Social Security Act and associated regulations. CMS requires Medicaid programs to report plan-level, state-specific sanctions for MCOs in Managed Care Program Annual Reports (MCPAR), including all administrative penalties, and corrective action plans, it issued. Please provide data from July 1, 2021 onward that each state, territory, and the District of Columbia has reported to CMS in tab D3 of their respective MCPARs.

I appreciate your commitment to ensuring that the Medicaid program, a bedrock for tens of millions of American, remains strong and is subject to appropriate oversight. I look forward to working with you to further strengthen it to ensure patients receive the care they deserve. If you or your staff have questions, please contact Peter Gartrell, chief investigator, at 202-224-5364.

Sincerely,

Robert P. Casey, Jr.

Chairman

Special Committee on Aging

Posted on

Edgewater Systems to pay $1.25M in Medicaid claims settlement

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: The counseling firm failed to get sign off from qualified providers on individualized care plans.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.insideindianabusiness.com/articles/edgewater-systems-to-pay-1-25m-in-medicaid-claims-settlement

Tuesday, October 3, 2023 12:30 PM EDT

By Carley Lanich

 
 

(Adobe Stock Photo)

HAMMOND, Ind. – A Gary-based health care provider is expected to pay the state $1.25 million to resolve claims the company fraudulently billed the Indiana Medicaid program for mental health services.

U.S. Attorney Clifford Johnson’s office announced in a press release that state and federal officials reached a settlement with Edgewater Systems for Balanced Living to resolve civil claims brought against the company.

The Indiana Medicaid program — which provides services to low-income, often uninsured Hoosiers — is funded jointly by the state and federal government.

Story Continues Below

Federal officials say Edgewater repeatedly billed Indiana Medicaid for mental health counseling sessions that failed to meet a requirement stating providers must draft an individualized care plan signed by a qualifying physician or health service provider before billing Medicaid.

Officials say the billing occurred between November 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017. They also said they believed Edgewater should have been aware of the billing requirement due to past negative audits.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Wayne T. Ault handled the settlement negociation following an investigation initiated by the northern district court and conducted with assistance from the Indiana Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit.

 
 

 
 

 
 

Posted on

Carr: Child Behavioral Health Counselor Convicted of Medicaid Fraud

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Mr. Lacey’s shenanigans were first noticed by Wellcare. MCO fraud referrals do happen.

 
 

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://law.georgia.gov/press-releases/2023-09-28/carr-child-behavioral-health-counselor-convicted-medicaid-fraud

ATLANTA, GA – Attorney General Chris Carr today announced that Antonio Lacey, 47, a behavioral health counselor in Locust Grove, has been convicted of repeatedly submitting false claims to the Georgia Medicaid program for which he obtained $45,212. A Henry County Superior Court Judge sentenced the defendant to five years, with six months to be served in prison and the remainder on probation.

“Mr. Lacey used his role as a children’s counselor to defraud our state’s Medicaid program,” said Carr. “He placed personal greed above his responsibilities as a provider, and in the process, he broke the trust of Georgia families in need of services. Now he will spend time behind bars for his illegal actions, and we will continue our efforts to protect taxpayer dollars no matter the amount.”

Antonio Lacey Guilty Plea

On Aug. 15, 2023, Lacey pleaded guilty to both counts of the indictment brought by the Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Division:

  • Medicaid Fraud in violation of O.C.G.A. § 49-4-146.1 (b)(1)
  • False Statements and Writings in violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-10-20

Lacey paid restitution in the amount of $45,212 at the time of his plea.

Case Summary

Lacey was enrolled in Georgia Medicaid as a provider of behavioral health services for children who cannot afford care. In a routine audit of Lacey’s practice, Wellcare, a care management organization working under contract with Georgia Medicaid, reported the lack of documentation and parents’ denial of services to the Georgia Department of Community Health (DCH). DCH referred the case to the Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Division for further investigation. Their findings resulted in a two-count indictment against Lacey for submitting claims for which no services had been provided.

This case was investigated by Medicaid Fraud Division Investigators Ulecia Daniel and Wilner Piquant, along with Investigative Auditor Phoenecia Hunt and Intel Analyst Zwella Boyd. The case was prosecuted by Senior Assistant Attorney General Henry Allen Hibbert.

About the Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Division

The Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Division receives 75 percent of its funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under a grant award totaling $4,718,240 for Federal fiscal year (FY) 2023. The remaining 25 percent, totaling $1,607,601 for FY 2024, is funded by the State of Georgia.

Posted on

FRAUD (WA)- West Richland WA couple accused of $700,000 in Medicaid fraud

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: A husband and wife couple stole a ton of cash. This story even includes a few good ole fashioned stake outs.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.tri-cityherald.com/news/local/crime/article279782849.html

Crime


By Cameron Probert

September 30, 2023 5:00 AM

Richland, WA

A West Richland couple allegedly led a criminal organization that bilked Medicaid for more than $700,000, according to a Washington state investigation.

Cloreese Wilkinson-Rivera, 46, and Carlos P. Rivera, 44, allegedly spent three years creating phantom therapy appointments, billing the wrong amounts to insurance companies and charging for appointments that never happened, according to recently filed court documents.

They used the money to pay for their home and at least five luxury cars, including two Ferraris and a Lamborghini.

After a lengthy investigation, the Washington State Attorney General’s Office filed 17 counts against the couple in Benton County Superior Court.

They are accused of leading a criminal organization, five counts of theft, five counts of money laundering and submitting false statements to Medicaid.

Wilkinson-Rivera also faces one count of forgery.

They have both been summoned to court to enter pleas to the charges on Oct. 19.

The couple ran Tri-Cities Marital and Family Therapy from an office building on Stevens Drive in Richland, according to public records.

The investigation also includes a Kennewick location where they operated previously.

Wilkinson-Rivera led a team of counselors, and Rivera ran the business, including billing, according to court documents.

Wilkinson-Rivera has had a lengthy career providing mental health services that began in 2004, according to her profile on Psychology Today. She has served as a bilingual clinician, a vocational rehabilitation counselor, a daycare provider and a hospital case manager.

Department of Health records say she became a licensed mental health counselor in 2015, and, according to the state attorney general, the alleged theft started shortly after.

Fraudulent billing

The state’s Medicaid Fraud Control Division started investigating the couple after getting a tip from a former co-worker, said Special Agent Ses Maiava in an affidavit.

The tipster said Wilkinson-Rivera was double billing for services not rendered. That including billing an entire family for therapy, but only treating one person.

Investigators soon discovered the couple was submitting Medicaid billing claims that misrepresented what they were doing, and raked in $710,000 between January 2016 and June 2019.

That included billing for patients who missed, skipped or canceled appointments, using incorrect billing codes, and submitting claims for hour-long sessions that were, in reality, much shorter.

The alleged fraudulent billing also included people who were never treated by anyone at the Tri-Cities Marital and Family Therapy.

“Sometimes these billings would correspond with family member’s treatments, but other times there would be a claim that was paid without any reason for it to be billed,” Maiava wrote. “I refer to these claims as ‘Phantom Billings.'”

Billing more than 24 hours

After getting the tip, a fiscal expert went through the billing statements that Wilkinson-Rivera had sent in and allegedly found she would have been working for more than 24 hours in a day.

State investigators watched Wilkinson-Rivera go into the office during three separate three-day periods in October 2018, January 2019 and March 2019. Each time, she billed for dozens of hours that she wasn’t working at the building.

During the surveillance in January, agents counted 44 people enter the facility, while Medicaid billing records allegedly showed them treating 133.

The records also showed she allegedly billed a family of five who had a group therapy, as if each member was treated during a separate 60-minute session.

In another case during the January period, a family of five was billed for a therapy session they never attended. In another family, one child received therapy, but then the child’s two siblings were also billed for individual hour-long sessions.

Investigators also searched the therapy office, Wilkinson-Rivera and Rivera’s home and got email and cellphone records.

As they searched the records, they found a number of appointments which were allegedly billed for an hour, but they only spent a half-hour on the phone.

In addition, they allegedly discovered that there were online or phone therapy sessions that were billed as if they were in person. Emails between the couple showed them encouraging or directing employees to use phone sessions to increase billing.

They also found the insurance was billed for appointments that were canceled or missed.

“(Text) messages from Cloreese Wilkinson-Rivera to Carlos Rivera show they wanted to make as much money as possible after Cloreese Wilkinson-Rivera complains about working 50 hours and making little money in 2016,” according to court documents.

Phantom sessions

The bulk of the alleged fraud, more than $466,000, were for “phantom sessions.”

One of the examples listed was for a family of five people who were billed $23,000 for sessions that allegedly didn’t happened. One of the parents said she didn’t take her children to appointments during work hours for weekly sessions in the summer.

“The calendar entries show 417 of these sessions were phantom sessions or sessions that did not occur,” according to the affidavit.

In addition to the false bills, the couple also applied for health benefits from Medicaid for each other and each of their children between 2016 and 2019.

Fancy cars and house

The couple is accused of funneling the fraudulent payments into making car and mortgage payments.

While their West Richland home is now valued at more than $1 million, according to the Benton County Assessor’s Office, they paid $270,000 when they bought it in 2014.

According to court documents, they spent $112,000 on mortgage payments and $137,000 in car payments.

Among the car payments, there were five luxury cars they were paying for, including a 2004 Lamborghini Gallardo, a 2001 Ferrari Modena and a 1996 Ferrari.

Each of the cars can sell for between $80,000 and more than $100,000, according to CarFax.

Posted on

MCO (FL) – CareSource and Spark Pediatrics Partner to Serve Florida Medicaid Enrollees

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: CareSource adds another partner to its dance card for the FL market. This time with a focus on children with a need for medical daycare.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20231003356924/en/CareSource-and-Spark-Pediatrics-Partner-to-Serve-Florida-Medicaid-Enrollees

Partnership unites two innovative, mission-driven healthcare companies as ImagineCare

JACKSONVILLE, Fla.–(BUSINESS WIRE)-CareSource, a nationally recognized managed care organization, and Spark Pediatrics, the leading provider of prescribed pediatric extended centers (PPEC or Medical Daycare) in both Florida and nationally, announced today the launch of ImagineCare — a partnership to serve Florida Medicaid enrollees as a Provider Service Network (PSN). ImagineCare is an innovative managed care organization focused on deploying a provider-driven, community-centric, value-based care model for enrollees with medical complexities.

ImagineCare intends to participate in the procurement to serve Floridians who are part of the Statewide Medicaid Managed Care program administered by the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration. At the heart of the partnership is the mission to address social determinants of health that will directly improve the lives of vulnerable Floridians, including strong alignment with Hope Florida’s Pathways to Prosperity program that connects people to organizations empowered to help with all SDoH needs, leading them on an individualized path to prosperity, economic self-sufficiency and hope.

ImagineCare brings together two mission driven organizations that have a steeped history in delivering best-in-class care for the underserved populations. CareSource is a nationally recognized managed care organization with more than 30 years of Medicaid managed care experience, a nonprofit mission, and an established reputation as a leader in quality and operational excellence. In addition, CareSource is committed to enrollee-centric care and value-based provider partnerships, and — through its subsidiary, The Columbus Organization – has a steeped Florida history of similarly providing community-based services to Floridians.

Together through ImagineCare, CareSource and Spark intend to elevate Florida’s healthcare delivery model through operational ease for providers and a more person- and family-centered approach that empowers all enrollees to improve their everyday activities and lives.

“ImagineCare will clearly further our mission to transform care delivery for the most vulnerable populations in Florida,” said Jeff Soffen, Chief Executive Officer of Spark Pediatrics. “CareSource’s operational excellence and its leadership in focusing on social determinants of health will bring much needed care and innovation for this underserved population. We envision a world where all people, regardless of their medical condition, have access to the care and support they need to thrive, and are excited to bring this partnership to life in service of that mission.”

Further bolstering ImagineCare healthcare delivery is the leadership of The Columbus Organization, a subsidiary of CareSource. Columbus participates in a Florida Medicaid Waiver program, Consumer Directed Care Plus, which provides the opportunity for individuals to improve the quality of their lives by being empowered to make choices about the supports and services that will meet their needs and help them reach their goals.

ImagineCare will combine Spark and Columbus’ capabilities and understanding of the Florida healthcare delivery system with CareSource’s operational proficiency, its history as a recognized healthcare innovator and its industry leadership in expanding access to quality care beyond the four walls of the doctor’s office.

“As a nonprofit organization, we focus first on the people and the communities we serve, not shareholders,” said Erhardt Preitauer, President & CEO of CareSource. “With ImagineCare, we have an opportunity to be an innovative, sustainable partner to the state that will make a lasting difference in the health and well-being of Floridians while driving better quality and outcomes.”

ImagineCare is committed to improving the health of Floridians by leveraging local physician experience to inform decision-making, aligning incentives, using data more effectively and reducing friction between the delivery and the financing of healthcare.

“With ImagineCare, we are investing directly in Florida, in our communities, and in our enrollees,” said Larry Smart, Chief Financial Officer at CareSource. “As a full-time Florida resident for more than 30 years working in our state’s managed care industry, I am thrilled to be a part of this exciting announcement.”

If you are a provider interested in learning more about ImagineCare, please email ProviderInfo@ImagineCareHealth.com.

About ImagineCare

ImagineCare is a joint venture between CareSource and Spark Pediatrics combining both organization’s mission-driven approaches for a lasting difference in the health of enrollees and communities in Florida. Supported by CareSource’s 30+ years of managed health plan experience and Spark Pediatric’s 12 years of Florida experience providing in-home healthcare services and clinic-based therapies, ImagineCare intends to offer Florida Medicaid managed care recipients comprehensive health coverage and provide access to high-quality providers while delivering compassion and care.

About Spark Pediatrics

Spark Pediatrics is the best-in-class provider of care for children with medical complexities. Spark is the country’s largest provider of Prescribed Pediatric Extended Care (“PPEC”) centers, also known as Medical Daycare, an innovative community-based care center that provides a team-based, quality-driven, and empathetic environment for children with medical complexities to receive critical skilled nursing while promoting interpersonal socialization. Each clinic is staffed with pediatric-specialized nurses and complex care therapists supporting Physical, Speech and Occupational Therapy, as well as Applied Behavioral Analysis. Spark Pediatrics currently operates as the largest PPEC operator in Florida and Texas and serves as a strategic partner to hospital systems, health plans, pediatricians, specialists, and community organizations to deliver the best outcomes for children with medical complexities and their families. Spark is backed by Altitude Capital and Town Hall Ventures, both of whom specialize in funding the next generation of innovation for underserved populations.

About CareSource

CareSource is a nonprofit, nationally recognized managed care organization with over 2.3 million enrollees. Since its founding in 1989, CareSource administers one of the largest Medicaid managed care plans in the U.S. The organization offers health insurance, including Medicaid, Health Insurance Marketplace and Medicare products. As a mission-driven organization, CareSource is transforming health care with innovative programs that address the social determinants of health, health equity, prevention and access to care.

CareSource Florida Co. was formed to offer programs and products in the state of Florida.

About The Columbus Organization

A subsidiary of CareSource, The Columbus Organization empowers individuals to realize their meaningful-life goals through nationally recognized care/support coordination, professional clinical staffing, and quality improvement services for the intellectual/developmental disability (I/DD) or behavioral needs community. The Company delivers an unmatched depth of expertise, breadth of resources, diversity of thinking, and dedication to finding the most appropriate, personalized solutions for its customers.