Posted on

FRAUD (MN)- Ellison’s office has charged 18 with Medicaid fraud that netted nearly $10 million

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: This one had lots of features, including a giant “services not provided” bill for personal care services and a check-cashing scheme.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.twincities.com/2023/09/01/ellisons-office-has-charged-18-with-medicaid-fraud-that-netted-nearly-10-million/

 
 

Five people face charges in an alleged scheme to defraud the Minnesota Medical Assistance program of nearly $10 million.

The complaints filed in Hennepin County District Court allege owners and employees of a personal care company called MN Professional PCA billed for services that were not performed and for services that were not supervised by a nurse or other qualified professional.

Owners Abdikarim Mohamed and Ahmed Nur, along with three managers of MN Professional, are charged with racketeering, engaging in business of concealing criminal proceeds, and aiding and abetting theft by swindle.

The fraudulent activity is alleged to have occurred between 2016 and 2021.

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison called the case the largest Medicaid fraud prosecution by his office.

A total of 18 people have been charged as part of the ongoing investigation.

The complaint alleges the company billed Medicaid for more than 25,000 hours of services that were not provided.

The company also provided services not supervised by a professional to at least 120 clients.

The total alleged fraud is about $9.5 million, according to Ellison.

The complaint alleges the men concealed the fraudulent payments through an elaborate check-cashing scheme.

Investigators said Mohamed and Nur also fraudulently listed their wives as “board members” and “consultants” and paid them salaries amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

To date, 18 people have been charged as part of the investigation, and five have pleaded guilty.

The investigation was led by the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit in the attorney general’s office and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General.

The attorney general’s office said additional charges are expected as the investigation continues.

 
 

Posted on

PROVIDERS (LTC)- “Crackdown”: Proposed Nursing Home Minimum Staffing Rule to Cost the Industry $4.23 Billion and Would Directly Impact For-Profit Facilities

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: The initial push back to Biden’s effort to increase care levels in nursing homes has been fierce.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/crackdown-proposed-nursing-home-minimum-4430387/

 
 

According to President Biden’s recently published column, the Administration’s proposed rule, published on September 6, 2023, mandating that nursing homes begin to staff facilities so that registered nurses (RNs) and nurse aides (NAs) provide a minimum number of hours per resident day (HPRD) of care is a “crackdown” designed to “[deliver] a clear message to the nursing home industry: no more padding profits on the backs of residents and nurses.” The President’s column clarifies that the Administration is focused on for-profit facility staffing, particularly in those facilities owned by private equity firms, although the rule would apply to both non-profit and for-profit facilities. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) estimate that facilities’ total cost to satisfy the proposed minimum staffing requirement would cost the industry approximately $4.23 billion. Furthermore, CMS and HHS acknowledge that the proposed requirements would require approximately 79 percent of long term care (LTC) facilities to increase their staff levels to ensure full compliance with the proposed requirements.

The rule suggests a comprehensive staffing approach requiring Medicare and Medicaid-certified LTCs to: 1) abide by a new minimum nurse staffing standard based on case-mix; 2) increase their on-site RN presence; and 3) consider new factors in their facility assessments. Specifically, the proposed rule would mandate that facilities maintain an RN staffing requirement of 0.55 HPRD, which is higher than any current RN staffing requirement in any state, except for the District of Columbia. The proposed rule would also require that NAs be staffed at a minimum of 2.45 HPRD, higher than the current minimum in any state or the District of Columbia. Hours staffed by other licensed nurses, such as licensed practical nurses (LPNs) and licensed vocational nurses (LVNs), would not be included in the minimum requirement. In addition, LTC facilities would be required to have an RN onsite 24 hours per day, seven days a week.

Critically, the rule makes clear that the minimum established HPRD is a floor, not a ceiling. Facilities must ensure that their staffing levels consider patient acuity and are based on the results of a facility assessment conducted at least annually, the extensive requirements for which are set out in the proposed rule. The facility assessment is to be developed using evidence-based, data-driven methods that consider both the needs of the facility’s residents and the facility staff’s competencies. The proposed rule emphasizes that it is not incentivizing facilities currently staffing at higher levels than proposed in the rule to decrease numbers, but rather to ensure that “a LTC facility’s staffing decisions should be based on the specific needs of its resident population and not motivated by cost-savings.”

The proposed rule does include a hardship exemption from the minimum HPRD requirements for RNs and NAs, under certain circumstances. To qualify, the facility must be located either in an area where the supply of RNs and/or NAs is insufficient to meet geographic needs, as determined by CMS and HHS, or be 20 or more miles from the next closest LTC facility. In addition, the facility must also be able to document that it has made a good-faith effort to hire and retain staff. Lastly, the facility must be surveyed and cited as noncompliant with the minimum staffing requirement, then demonstrate through documentation the financial resources that the facility expends annually on nurse staffing relative to revenue. However, facilities can negate a potentially available exemption from the staffing requirement if they fail to submit payroll-based journal system data, are classified as a Special Focus Facility (SFF), or based on survey history and other criteria. The proposed rule would implement the final requirements in three phases over a three-year period for facilities located in urban areas, and over a five-year period for facilities located in rural areas.

CMS and HHS state that the types of LTC facilities that may need to increase staffing to meet the minimum requirements include for-profit facilities, as compared to government and non-profit facilities. Also expected to be impacted are larger facilities, freestanding LTC facilities (relative to hospital-based facilities), facilities that are part of a continuing care retirement community, facilities with higher shares of Medicaid residents, SFF facilities or candidates, and rural facilities.

The proposed rule also emphasizes the need for increased efforts to recruit and retain direct care workers into the industry. The proposal includes a new provision that would specify requirements for states to report, annually by delivery system and by facility, the percentage of Medicaid payments that nursing facilities spent on compensation for direct care workers and support staff.

Analyses of the proposed mandates, to date, have noted a number of issues with the proposed rule, as it is currently drafted, that would significantly increase the investment and oversight involved in operating a nursing home. 

Posted on

PROVIDERS/LTC- HHS Proposes Minimum Staffing Standards to Enhance Safety and Quality in Nursing Homes

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: The new rule would require more than 75% of facilities can offer.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2023/09/01/hhs-proposes-minimum-staffing-standards-enhance-safety-quality-in-nursing-homes.html

Builds on President Biden’s Historic Commitment to Create a Long-Term Care System Where People Can Live with Dignity 

Today, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), issued a proposed rule that seeks to establish comprehensive staffing requirements for nursing homes—including, for the first time, national minimum nurse staffing standards—to ensure access to safe, high-quality care for the over 1.2 million residents living in nursing homes each day. This proposed rule builds on the President’s historic Action Plan for Nursing Home Reform launched in the 2022 State of the Union.

Today’s action is one among many advanced by the Biden-Harris Administration to build a long-term care system where all older Americans can age with dignity, where people with disabilities can receive high quality services in the setting of their choice, where family caregivers are adequately supported, and where there is a pipeline of direct care workers into good-paying jobs with the free and fair choice to join a union. 

“Establishing minimum staffing standards for nursing homes will improve resident safety and promote high-quality care so residents and their families can have peace of mind,” said HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra. “When facilities are understaffed, residents suffer. They might be unable to use the bathroom, shower, maintain hygiene, change clothes, get out of bed, or have someone respond to their call for assistance. Comprehensive staffing reforms can improve working conditions, leading to higher wages and better retention for this dedicated workforce.”

“CMS is proud to be leading the President’s initiative to improve the lives of over 1.2 million residents who reside in Medicare and Medicaid-certified long-term care facilities, and those who will need that care in the future,” said CMS Administrator Chiquita Brooks-LaSure. “Today, we took an important first step to propose new staffing requirements that will hold nursing homes accountable and make sure that residents get the safe, high-quality care that they deserve.”

Under CMS’s proposal, nursing homes participating in Medicare and Medicaid would be required to meet specific nurse staffing levels that promote safe, high-quality care for residents. Nursing homes would need to provide residents with a minimum of 0.55 hours of care from a registered nurse per resident per day, and 2.45 hours of care from a nurse aide per resident per day, exceeding existing standards in nearly all states. CMS estimates approximately three quarters (75%) of nursing homes would have to strengthen staffing in their facilities. As the long-term care sector continues to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, the proposed standards take into consideration local realities in rural and underserved communities through staggered implementation and exemptions processes.

In addition, nursing homes would also be required to ensure a registered nurse is on site 24 hours per day, 7 days per week and to complete robust facility assessments on staffing needs. Facilities would continue to be required to provide staffing that meets the needs of the individual residents they serve, which may require higher levels of staffing above the proposed minimum standards.  

CMS also proposes to require states to collect and report on compensation for workers as a percentage of Medicaid payments for those working in nursing homes and intermediate care facilities. These policies build on CMS’ recent proposals to support compensation for direct care workers in home- and community-based settings and to publish Medicaid data on average hourly pay rates for home care workers. This enhanced transparency will aid efforts to support and stabilize the long-term care workforce across settings. The Biden-Harris Administration remains committed to strengthening access to high-quality long-term care both at home, in the community as well as in nursing homes and other facilities.

Additionally, CMS announced a national campaign to support staffing in nursing homes. As part of the HHS Workforce Initiative, CMS will work with the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and other partners to make it easier for individuals to enter careers in nursing homes, investing over $75 million in financial incentives, such as scholarships and tuition reimbursement. This staffing campaign builds on other actions by HHS and the Department of Labor to build the nursing workforce.

“Wages are an important part of job quality and drive challenges in recruitment and retention of direct care workers. Our research shows that in many places these workers can earn higher wages doing other entry-level work,” said Miranda Lynch-Smith, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.

More than 500,000 direct care workers provide care in nursing homes, assisting residents with daily tasks, such as bathing, dressing, mobility, and eating. This work, performed primarily by women of color, is significantly undervalued. Direct care workers across long-term care settings earn low wages, rarely receive health and retirement benefits, and experience high injury rates. Improving working conditions and wages will lead to improvements in the recruitment and retention of direct care workers and enable nursing staff to provide safer care. 

Findings published by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation show that wages for direct care workers trail other entry-level jobs. In 2019, median wages for nursing assistants were lower than the wages of other entry level jobs in 40 states and the District of Columbia. As an example, the median wage for nursing assistants in Louisiana is $10.90 per hour, compared to $13.41 for other entry-level positions. This is despite the significant demands of direct care jobs and their essential role in meeting the long-term care needs of older adults and people with disabilities.

Other announcements from CMS and the HHS Office of the Inspector General (HHS-OIG) made today would increase transparency, enhance enforcement of existing standards, increase accountability, and ensure safe, high-quality, and dignified care for people living in nursing homes. These announcements include:

  • Increasing Audits of Nursing Homes’ Staffing: CMS is expanding audits of the direct care staffing data that nursing homes must report to make sure that federal and state inspectors, as well as residents and their families, have accurate information, including through Nursing Home Care Compare, CMS’ informational website that families and prospective residents use to learn about facilities.
  • Improving Nursing Home Inspections: CMS will undertake new analyses of state inspection findings to ensure cited deficiencies receive the appropriate consequence, particularly in incidences involving resident harm. These analyses will ensure citations are applied more consistently and reflect the seriousness of the deficiency, permitting appropriate follow-through and enforcement.
  • Ensuring Taxpayer Dollars Go Toward Safe, High-Quality Care: HHS-OIG is performing new oversight work to follow the money on how nursing homes spend the taxpayer funds they receive. This will include analysis of how nursing homes may profit at the expense of taxpayers and residents by using services, suppliers, or facilities controlled by parties they own or are otherwise connected to, rather than from vendors who might charge a more competitive price. These “related party transactions,” have not only obscured how taxpayer funds are being used by nursing homes, but also prevent a transparent and accurate assessment of whether profits and payouts to shareholders are prioritized above investments in resident safety and fair wages for workers. 
  • Cracking Down on Inappropriate Antipsychotic Prescribing Practices and Risks: Grave concerns persist – PDF that nursing homes are overprescribing dangerous antipsychotic drugs to residents. To support efforts to reduce the misuse of these powerful medications, HHS-OIG is examining risks at nursing homes that have concerning prescribing practices. This builds on recent actions by CMS to increase oversight of inappropriate use of antipsychotic medication.
  • Enhancing Resident Safety During Emergencies: Nursing home residents are often among the most vulnerable to public health emergencies and recent emergencies have exposed weaknesses in nursing home emergency planning and harm to residents who suffered from inadequate care. The HHS-OIG is undertaking a new effort to improve resident safety during emergencies, including launching a national study of nursing home preparedness and key challenges and identifying practices to strengthen protections for residents.

The proposed rule is available at https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/current

The ASPE report is available at: https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/dcw-wages

The CMS fact sheet is available at: https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/medicare-and-medicaid-programs-minimum-staffing-standards-long-term-care-facilities-and-medicaid

Posted on

STATE NEWS- RI Medicaid call delays are New England’s highest

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: 39 minutes to wait on hold is pretty bad.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.wpri.com/target-12/feds-alarmed-by-medicaid-call-wait-times-in-ri-ranked-longest-in-new-england/

PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI) — The federal government is raising concerns about how long Medicaid recipients are waiting on the phone to speak with state officials, as Rhode Island wait times rank worst in New England.

The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services sent letters to all 50 states earlier this month, providing them with a series of metrics tied to the ongoing recertification process that requires all Medicaid recipients to re-enroll in the federal health insurance program.

About 350,000 Rhode Islanders — about a third of the state — are enrolled in the program. Recertification was put on pause during the coronavirus pandemic but resumed in April and is expected to take a year to complete.

A Target 12 review of the letters revealed Rhode Island had the worst wait times in New England, averaging 39 minutes per call in May. The delays were far shorter in neighboring states, averaging only one minute in Connecticut and two minutes in Massachusetts.

“CMS has concerns that your average call center wait times and abandonment rate are impeding equitable access to assistance for people who apply for Medicaid,” CMS officials wrote to Rhode Island leaders.

R.I. Human Services Director Kim Merolla-Brito, who oversees the call center, said she wasn’t surprised about the critical letter from the feds as lengthy wait times has been a challenge for a long time in Rhode Island. But she defended the state’s effort in trying to chip away at the issue.

“It is not acceptable,” she told Target 12. “It has been something that DHS has been working on for quite some time.”

BACKGROUND: Wait times a problem heading into RI Medicaid recertification

Merolla-Brito said her department has been working to shorten the time people have to wait on the phone, including call-back services and closing the call lines on Wednesdays so employees can catch up on processing paperwork.

She acknowledged the idea of closing the call center for an entire day could sound counterintuitive, but she argued that by catching up on paperwork, people would receive services more efficiently and that could reduce the number of reasons someone would need need to call.

“The more time that goes by and utilization of our technology resources that are in place will also drive down some of the volume that’s coming into the call center,” she said.

Staffing is another challenge the department is facing.

Merolla-Brito said she needs about 20 more people across her entire system of service providers. And while she said her call center is nearly staffed up, the director plans on asking the General Assembly for an additional 20 full-time positions to help alleviate some of the high-demand the department is experiencing across the board.

“The data that we have I believe will support us asking for it,” she said. “It changes the model in the call center and brings a higher ratio of staff.”

When asked why Rhode Island wait times were so much worse than neighboring states, Merolla-Brito said some other states have more sophisticated technology. Others have call centers completely dedicated to Medicaid calls-for-service, which differs from Rhode Island where workers are also fielding calls from SNAP recipients. The federal food and income program vies with Medicaid for being the largest benefits program in Rhode Island.

Merolla-Brito said there aren’t currently any plans on splitting up the state’s call center to have a group of workers dedicated to fielding Medicaid calls, but she said she’s open to the idea.

“It’s not off the table for us to consider,” she said.

In addition to the long wait times, CMS also raised concerns with the state’s high rate of so-called “procedural termination,” which includes people getting kicked off the program for various reasons such as the state not being able to contact them. Federal officials said the state’s high rate of 11% in May “raises concerns that eligible individuals, including children, may be losing coverage.”

TARGET 12: Thousands of Rhode Islanders booted from Medicaid since April

R.I. Medicaid Director Kristin Sousa, who oversees the program at the state level, sent a letter back to CMS acknowledging the concern. But she highlighted that Rhode Island was deferring the renewal process for families with children until January to make sure they worked out all the kinks in the system beforehand.

“This additional time will provide the state an opportunity to maximize efficiency by identifying and addressing procedural, structure, or system issues while processing Medicaid redeterminations,” she wrote in a letter dated Aug. 22.

Sousa also touted the state’s 2% rate of returned mail, saying it was relatively low and attributing it to their effort to get out the word that recertification was once again required.

“We have been very aggressive in communicating the Medicaid renewal process to members and stakeholders,” she wrote.

The state leaders are hopeful the process will only improve as recertification continues through the rest of the year and into next spring. But because the state deferred families with children, the largest strain on the system will likely begin at the end of the year, raising questions about how well the state’s effort will stand up.

Asked whether she expected wait times to go up at the end of the year, Merolla-Brito said, “I don’t.”

Sarah Guernelli (sguernelli@wpri.com) is the consumer investigative reporter for 12 News. Connect with her on Twitter and on Facebook.

Eli Sherman (esherman@wpri.com) is a Target 12 investigative reporter for 12 News. Connect with him on Twitter and on Facebook.

Posted on

STATE NEWs- Cameron calls for eliminating income tax, imposing Medicaid work requirements

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Egads!

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.lpm.org/news/2023-08-30/cameron-calls-for-eliminating-income-tax-imposing-medicaid-work-requirements

 
 

Republican Daniel Cameron unveiled his “vision for prosperity plan” Wednesday, saying he wants to lower taxes for Kentuckians and get more people in the workforce.

Cameron, the state’s attorney general, announced his economic plan for Kentucky Wednesday morning. The most concrete parts of the plan include eliminating the state income tax and instituting work requirements for Kentuckians on Medicaid.

During a news conference in Louisville, he criticized the economic records of incumbent Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear and President Joe Biden.

“Andy Beshear and Joe Biden are singing out of the same hymnal when it comes to your finances,” Cameron said at a news conference. “Andy Beshear has led as the welfare governor, I will lead as the workforce governor.”

Cameron’s plan to eliminate the state income tax comes after the state legislature passed measures lowering the income tax two years in a row. This year, Kentucky’s income tax decreased to 4.5%, and the legislature passed another slash to the state’s income tax that will go into effect January 2024. Beshear signed the most recent measure.

“The government was created to serve the people, not the other way around. This governor can’t veto tax cuts and budget reserves and then go on to take credit for every new job in Kentucky,” Cameron said.

Beshear vetoed the 2022 tax cut bill, although in his veto message Beshear objected to portions of the bill that extended sales tax to more services.

Jason Bailey, executive director of the progressive-leaning Kentucky Center for Economic Policy, said income tax makes up roughly 40% of Kentucky’s annual budget. He said eliminating it, or even cutting it, would be a massive hit to state-funded programs like education and infrastructure.

“No one who is proposing to eliminate [the state income tax] has provided any plan or even identified an option that would generate that kind of revenue,” Bailey said. “Right now, we’re in a period where unemployment is very, very low, and that helps raise that revenue. But, you know, recessions come. At some point, we will need those revenues.”

Income tax revenues are already down due to the first round of cuts despite low unemployment and high inflation. By June, the state had collected $172 million less so far from withholding income alone compared to last year.

Only one other state has eliminated their income tax – Alaska after the creation of the Trans-Alaska Pipline created billions of dollars in new revenue. Meanwhile, the other states that don’t have an income tax never had one to begin with.

Bailey said many of those states have enough natural resources or tourism to make up for the gap, which Kentucky does not have. Many also have significantly higher sales taxes, which disproportionately hurt low-income households.

Medicaid work requirement

Another key element of Cameron’s plan would create a work requirement for some people who receive Medicaid benefits – a plan championed by former GOP Gov. Matt Bevin.

During the news conference, Cameron accused Beshear and his father, former Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear, of creating a “welfare state.”

“The Beshear family legacy is one of expanding the welfare state and creating a culture of dependency that threatens not only our economy, but also the very nature of who we are as people,” Cameron said.

The elder Gov. Beshear expanded Medicaid eligibility in Kentucky to include adults who make up to 138% of the federal poverty level.

Cameron said he does not intend to reverse the Medicaid expansion, but to place work requirements on “able-bodied adults.”

Bevin attempted to require Medicaid beneficiaries to prove they are working, trying to find work, volunteering or performing a “community engagement” activity every month in order to stay in the program. The program was held up in the courts system and ultimately disbanded by Beshear.

But a 2019 study published in the Journal of American Medical Association found that about 3.5% of Kentuckians who are on Medicaid would have been at risk of losing their Medicaid under the requirement. The Government Accountability Office said the plan would have cost hundreds of millions of dollars in administrative expenses.

Bailey said similar requirements in other states have resulted in fewer people getting Medicaid because they struggle with the paperwork.

“People lose coverage, not because they’re not working, but because they are not keeping up with the paperwork requirements,” Bailey said. “It’s not really a work requirement, it’s paperwork requirements… It’s a misguided policy that is very expensive to implement.”

During the pandemic, significantly more people enrolled in Medicaid. By early 2023, enrollment in Kentucky was up 168% to more than 1.6 million people. But as people are required to requalify this year for the first time since the pandemic, Bailey said he expects that number to decrease substantially.

In response to Cameron’s plan, Beshear campaign spokesman Alex Floyd said the Democratic governor has been one of the “best governors for economic development” in state history.

“Andy Beshear has cut taxes while bringing record-breaking economic investment to Kentucky year after year. Daniel Cameron’s reckless plan is just a rerun of the Matt Bevin playbook of cutting health care access, privatizing our public schools, and raising taxes on working families to pay for a tax giveaway for the wealthy,” Floyd said

Posted on

STATE NEWS (GA)- Georgia Medicaid agency asking to add oversight workers

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: DCH needs about 49 more folks to help manage MCOs.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://capitol-beat.org/2023/08/georgia-medicaid-agency-asking-to-add-oversight-workers/

 
 

ATLANTA – The state agency that runs Georgia’s Medicaid program is asking for $7.2 million for a new initiative aimed at improving oversight of the private sector companies that manage health care for the state’s Medicaid recipients.

The Georgia Board of Community Health voted unanimously Thursday to seek the funds as part of the Department of Community Health’s (DCH) fiscal 2024 mid-year budget request.

Most of the money would go toward adding 49 positions to give the department the ability to predict where the Medicaid program is headed rather than being forced to react to budget needs, DCH Chief Operating Officer Joe Hood told board members before Thursday’s vote.

“We’d like to be looking at trends in advance, not just on the back end,” he said.

With the state sitting on a massive budget surplus, Gov. Brian Kemp has given agencies across state government the leeway to propose spending increases of 3% in their fiscal 2024 midyear and fiscal 2025 budget requests.

“This is our first opportunity in some time to ask for new funds,” Hood said.

The new oversight initiative comes as the DCH prepares to issue a Request for Proposals to select private-sector care management organizations (CMOs) to run Georgia’s Medicaid program. The staffing increase is aimed at helping the agency make the right choices.

“We’re under-resourced for a state of our size in CMO management,” Hood said.

Meanwhile, the DCH also is seeking $1.3 million in its fiscal 2025 budget for 7% pay raises for employees in the agency’s Healthcare Facility Regulation Division, which oversees hospitals and nursing homes.

Hood said the raises would help reduce turnover.

“We need to be closer to the market rate,” he said. “This gives us some opportunity to do that.”

Finally, the board is proposing a $1.4 million reduction in next year’s DCH budget, which would come from savings in contractual services.

Besides allowing 3% spending hikes, Kemp’s budget instructions also asked state agencies to look for ways to cut their spending by 1%.

The governor will present his budget recommendations to the General Assembly in January.

Posted on

EXPANSION (NC)- Medicaid expansion delayed because of no final budget

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Welp.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://spectrumlocalnews.com/nc/charlotte/news/2023/08/29/medicaid-expansion-won-t-begin-in-north-carolina-on-oct–1-because-there-s-still-no-final-budget

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — With the state budget’s passage now two months late, North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper’s administration announced Monday that it can’t start the implementation of Medicaid expansion to hundreds of thousands of low-income adults in the early fall as it had wanted.

What You Need To Know

  • Oct. 1 was unveiled as the start date in July, provided that a budget law was enacted by Sept. 1
  • As many as 600,000 adults who earn too much to qualify for traditional Medicaid but too little to receive even heavily subsidized private insurance would be covered under the expansion
  • NCDHHS Sec. Kody Kinsley said a new launch date won’t be determined until the General Assembly gives his agency final authority for expansion, which he said could happen as early as December or “it could slip into 2024”

State Health and Human Services Secretary Kody Kinsley said that expansion won’t begin on Oct. 1, which in July he unveiled as the start date — provided that a budget law was enacted by Sept. 1.

A separate expansion law that the Democratic governor signed into law in March required a budget law be approved before people could start receiving coverage. Kinsley’s office had been working closely with federal regulators to get expansion off the ground quickly once legislators completed that final step.

But Republican House and Senate leaders in charge of the General Assembly have been slow in negotiating this summer a budget law that was supposed to be in place by July 1. The GOP holds veto-proof majorities in both chambers, leaving Cooper, who would be asked to sign the final budget into law, in a weak position to force action.

GOP lawmakers had signaled earlier this month that a budget wouldn’t get settled until September, and had declined to decouple Medicaid expansion implementation from the spending law. Both chambers scheduled no formal voting this week.

“It’s become clear to us that we will not be able to have a budget passed in time and enacted, nor will we have separate authority to move forward,” Kinsley told reporters. Kinsley said a new launch date won’t be determined until the General Assembly gives his agency final authority for expansion. He said it could happen as early as December, or “it could slip into 2024.”

“Our team will continue to work hard to have all of the tools ready and necessary to move forward on expansion, just as soon as we have clarity from the General Assembly about our ability to do so,” Kinsley said.

State officials have estimated the expansion of the government-funded health coverage would cover as many as 600,000 adults who earn too much to qualify for traditional Medicaid but too little to receive even heavily subsidized private insurance.

Kinsley has said about 300,000 people who already participate in a limited Medicaid program for family planning benefits such as contraception, annual exams and tests for pregnancy would automatically gain the broader, expanded Medicaid coverage on the first day of implementation.

“This is a tragic loss of health insurance … delaying something that we know they and their families need so badly,” he said.”This is a tragic loss of health insurance … delaying something that we know they and their families need so badly,” he said.

Kinsley also said that several thousand people being removed monthly from traditional Medicaid rolls due to income now that eligibility reviews are required again by the federal government following the end of the COVID-19 pandemic would be quickly returned to coverage under the expansion.

Top legislative Republicans — Senate leader Phil Berger and House Speaker Tim Moore — have said they remain committed to getting expansion up and going. They have said that budget votes could come in mid-September.

“Our priority is to put together the very best budget for all North Carolinians,” Moore said later Monday in a statement, adding that work on it would continue this week.

Cooper has criticized Republican legislators for the delay, which in turn has prevented the state from getting sooner over $500 million per month in additional federal funding that expansion would bring.

“North Carolinians have been waiting for Medicaid expansion for a decade. Because of Republicans’ ongoing budget delay, that wait continues with no end in sight,” Senate Minority Leader Dan Blue and House Minority Leader Robert Reives said in a news release.

North Carolina had been among 11 states that haven’t accepted expansion from the federal government before Cooper signed the expansion bill on March 27.

Posted on

MCOs (MI)- Michigan to rebid contracts for health plans under Medicaid and MIHealthyLife

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: The new RFP will require a pretty decent network. One with actual contracted providers, not just LOIs.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.ironmountaindailynews.com/covid-19/2023/08/michigan-to-rebid-contracts-for-health-plans-under-medicaid-and-mihealthylife/

LANSING — The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services has provided new information related to the rebidding of contracts for health plans that provide services to 2.2 million Michiganders receiving coverage through Medicaid and Michigan’s Healthy Michigan Plan.

MDHHS is announcing network requirements and minimum qualifications for bidders in its upcoming request for proposals for the Comprehensive Health Care Program contract for Michigan’s Medicaid health plans.

“We want to provide Michiganders served by Medicaid health plans with a more equitable, coordinated and person-centered system of care,” said Elizabeth Hertel, MDHHS director. “Through this rebid process, MDHHS seeks to provide improved affordable health care coverage for Michiganders served by Medicaid health plans.”

The contract is being rebid during fiscal year 2024, which begins Oct. 1, with new contracts beginning in fiscal year 2025. The rebid is part of MIHealthyLife, an initiative to strengthen Medicaid services informed by input from nearly 10,000 enrollees and family members, health care providers, health plans and other community partners.

Consistent with federal standards and input from MIHealthyLife stakeholders, the rebid will include updates to Michigan’s Medicaid Health Plan network adequacy and timely access standards, which can be found at Michigan.gov/MDHHS/MIHealthyLife.

When determining whether these standards are met, MDHHS will only consider providers with whom bidders have executed contracts at the time of bid submission. MDHHS is releasing its updates to the Comprehensive Health Care Program network adequacy and timely access standards in advance of the rebid to provide time for potential bidders to review their provider networks and execute provider contracts necessary to meet the new standards.

MDHHS’s new Medicaid Health plan network adequacy and timely access standards can be found at Michigan.gov/MDHHS/MIHealthyLife, along with mandatory minimum requirements Medicaid Health Plans must meet in order to qualify for review under the rebid.

In addition, the request for proposals will incorporate several Comprehensive Health Care Program changes intended to advance the MIHealthyLife pillars. These include:

— A commitment to health equity demonstrated by plans achieving the NCQAs Health Equity Accreditation, beginning the process no later than Oct. 1, 2024.

— A strong emphasis on addressing social determinants of health demonstrated by investment and engagement with community-based organizations.

— Efforts to increase childhood vaccination rates, including increasing provider participation in the Vaccines for Children Program.

— Adoption over time of a more person-centered approach to mental health care coverage.

The Medicaid Health Plan request for proposals will be posted to the SIGMA system in fall 2023, with responses due in January 2024. New contracts resulting from this rebid are scheduled to begin on Oct. 1, 2024. MDHHS reserves the right to change mandatory minimum requirements, dates or any other information deemed necessary.

Go online to Michigan.gov/MDHHS/MIHealthyLife for more information.

Questions about MIHealthyLife can also be sent directly to mdhhs-mihealthylife@michigan.gov.

Procurement-related questions can be sent to Samuelb@michigan.gov.

Newsletter

Today’s breaking news and more in your inbox

I’m interested in (please check all that apply)

  • Daily Newsletter
  • Breaking News
  • Obituaries

Are you a paying subscriber to the newspaper? *

  • Yes
  • No

   
 

Posted on

MCOs (LA)- State officials scrutinize BCBS Louisiana sale to Elevance

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: State senators and the AG want to know more about how the proceeds of the sale will work.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.beckerspayer.com/m-and-a/state-officials-scrutinize-bcbs-louisiana-sale-to-elevance.html

Three Louisiana state senators and the attorney general are calling for a delay of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana’s sale to Elevance Health, nola.com reported Aug. 16. 

The senators’ call for a delay stemmed from reports commissioned by the state’s insurance commission that was released shortly before a six-hour legislative hearing on the deal, according to the report. 

The independent reports from actuarial firms hired by the commission questioned how BCBS plans to structure the deal, according to the report. 

BCBS has proposed giving a fraction of the sale proceeds to policyholders, according to the report. That group includes employers and some beneficiaries who have purchased plans individually, but not every person in the state covered by the payer. Policyholders would receive about $307 million, which amounts to about $3,000 per policyholder. The rest would go to a nonprofit foundation called Accelerate Louisiana that would be created as a result from the sale.  

Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry said he does not have a position on the deal but has concerns about how it could affect premiums, how proceeds will be split between policyholders and a foundation that will be formed from the sale and whether the foundation is in the best interest of state residents, according to nola.com. He also said he opened an investigation into the deal for potential antitrust violations. 

BCBS Louisiana CEO Steve Udvarhelyi, MD, defended the deal before lawmakers, saying it is the best way to bring technology, better pharmacy benefits and new programs to Blue Cross beneficiaries. He said there will be no changes or layoffs, “but if we do not do something now to secure our future, the forces at play in the marketplace, the inevitable forces of consolidation, will happen and we will have to consolidate from a position of weakness.”

Elevance announced plans to acquire BCBS Louisiana in January. The company will become a for-profit subsidiary of Elevance if the deal is approved.  

The deal needs approval from the state insurance commissioner along with two-thirds of BCBS policyholders, according to the report. 

Subscribe to the following topics: blue cross blue shield of louisianaelevance healthaccelerate louisianasteve udvarhely

Posted on

MCOs (GA)- CareSource Georgia rolls out mobile clinics to help Medicaid recipients maintain health coverage

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: CareSource is sending in Wellness on Wheels to places where the data shows members are missing wellness visits.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://georgiarecorder.com/brief/caresource-georgia-rolls-out-mobile-clinics-to-help-medicaid-recipients-maintain-health-coverage/

 
 

Jason Bearden, president of CareSource Georgia, talks about how the care management organization is using a mobile clinic to reach people at risk of losing their Medicaid coverage during the unwinding. Jill Nolin/Georgia Recorder

The state has leaned on its three care management organizations as part of its strategy to alert all 2.8 million Medicaid enrollees of the return of the renewal process, which the federal government had paused during the pandemic.

And on Wednesday, one of them – CareSource Georgia – publicly launched part of its plan to reach its members: Go to them.

CareSource Georgia says it is partnering with providers across the state to use mobile clinics, dubbed Wellness on Wheels, to help spread the word about what people need to do to keep their Medicaid coverage.

Laptops are on board to help people update their information in the state system and go ahead and renew their coverage if it’s their turn to go through the process. The state is handling the renewals in groups one month at a time.

An alarming number of people have been losing their Medicaid coverage during the unwinding for procedural reasons – like not responding to renewal notices in time – and not because they are no longer eligible.

“You can communicate, advertise all day, but to have tools and the resources right there at their fingertips to get it done – there’s nothing like it,” said Jason Bearden, president of CareSource Georgia.

So far, CareSource Georgia and its partners have five such rolling mobile clinics throughout the state. Wednesday’s press conference outside the state Capitol featured Atlanta-based Eastchester Family Services.

Dr. Seema Csukas, chief medical officer at CareSource Georgia, said the program targets “medical deserts” and brings medical and behavioral health providers to those areas. Data showing where members have missed routine wellness checks helps determine destinations.

“We’re looking for areas where there are a lot of gaps, and that’s where we want to set up shop,” Csukas said.

If someone is no longer eligible for Medicaid, Bearden said CareSource staffers are trying to help educate members on their other options, including a new Medicaid program launched in July.

Georgia Pathways to Coverage is an option for low-income Georgians who complete 80 hours of work or qualifying activity each month to gain and keep coverage. The state has planned for as many as 100,000 people to enroll in the program, but the new initiative is off to a slow start. Just 265 people signed up in the first month.

Bearden said about 50 CareSource members signed up for Pathways, which he called “critical.”

“If it is determined that they’re above – unfortunately – the Medicaid eligibility lines, the first stop is ‘Hey, let’s look at Pathways. Are you eligible for Pathways? Are you in school? Are you doing volunteer work? Are you working? Part time or full time, that might qualify you for Pathways,'” Bearden said.

“So, that is a big part of the continuum,” he said. 

 
 

Ariel Esteves (left), vice president of clinical operations with CareSource, gives a tour of the exam room on board a mobile clinic. CareSource Georgia and its partner Eastchester Family Services are using the clinic to help people keep their Medicaid coverage. Jill Nolin/Georgia Recorder