Posted on

FWA (MN)- Federal Jury Finds Maple Grove Man Guilty of Wire Fraud, Aggravated Identity Theft in $1.4 Million Medicaid Fraud Conspiracy

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: He and his co-conspirators falsified claims for mental health services and interpreter forms.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.justice.gov/usao-mn/pr/federal-jury-finds-maple-grove-man-guilty-wire-fraud-aggravated-identity-theft-14-million

ST. PAUL, Minn. – A Maple Grove man has been convicted by a federal jury for his role in a $1.4 million Medicare fraud conspiracy, announced United States Attorney Andrew M. Luger.

Following a four-day trial before U.S. District Judge Eric C. Tostrud, Eskender M. Yousuf, 40, was convicted on all seven counts of the superseding indictment, including conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, and aggravated identity theft. The charged conspiracy consisted of nine total defendants. Six of Yousuf’s co-conspirators pleaded guilty prior to trial and two remain fugitives from law enforcement.

As proven at trial, Yousuf was a mental health practitioner who worked with Live Better, LLC, a patient services company with offices in Roseville and Minneapolis. As part of the scheme, Yousuf and his co-conspirators knowingly prepared and signed client progress notes for mental health services—and related interpreter verification forms—that were not actually rendered and submitted claims to the Minnesota Medicaid program for reimbursement of mental health services and the related interpretation of those services. As a result of the false and fraudulent claims, the Medicaid program paid more than $1.4 million for services that never occurred. A sentencing hearing will be scheduled at a later time.

This case is the result of an investigation conducted by the FBI; the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General; and the Minnesota Attorney General Office’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Angela M. Munoz and Jordan L. Sing tried the case.

Posted on

FWA (CT)- Woman who helped CT autistic kids gets 3 years for Medicaid scam

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: When she was busted for Medicaid fraud at the business she owned, she went and did the same thing as a silent partner at another business- while out on bail. Twice.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Helping-Hands-Bridgeport-Medicaid-scam-17551318.php

 
 

A former Connecticut resident who continued to defraud Medicaid even after she was charged with related offenses has been sentenced to three years in prison, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

Nicole Steiner, formerly known as Nicole Balkas, 33, was also sentenced to three years of supervised release once her prison term ends and was ordered by U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer to pay $505,955.56 in restitution, federal officials said. Steiner’s scheme cost Medicaid a total of $551,311.85 in losses, the Justice Department reported in August.

Steiner owned and operated Helping Hands Academy LLC, a Bridgeport business that provided applied behavior analysis services to children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder and served as a provider for the Connecticut Medicaid Program, according to federal officials. Between December 2018 and October 2020, Steiner submitted fraudulent Medicaid claims for applied behavior analysis services that were never provided or not provided as indicated in the claim, officials said.

ELECTION SALE: 6 MONTHS FOR 99¢!

6 MONTHS FOR 99¢

Act Now

Officials said Steiner, a former Stratford resident, also posed as a former employee to submit fraudulent claims in 2020. 

In August 2020, the state Department of Social Services, which administers the Connecticut Medicaid Program, terminated Helping Hands as a provider, according to court documents. Steiner made false statements and submitted an altered document in an attempt to reinstate Helping Hands as a provider and receive compensation for previously submitted claims, officials said.

Steiner pleaded guilty to one count of health care fraud on April 28, 2021, according to officials. She was released on a $50,000 bond pending sentencing. 

While out on bond, Steiner served as a “silent partner” in a company similar to Helping Hands named New Beginnings Children’s Behavioral Health LLC, according to officials. Steiner was put in charge of billing Medicaid for services rendered, managing payroll and recruiting and screening employees. She resumed submitting fraudulent Medicaid claims for applied behavioral analysis services that were never provided, officials said.

Steiner was arrested on May 2, according to officials. She pleaded guilty to a second count of health care fraud on July 29 and was released on a $250,000 bond pending sentencing, officials said.

While out on bond a second time, Steiner submitted applications indicating she lived in Bridgeport to obtain Medicaid coverage for her and her children, according to officials. However, she was living in New Jersey at the time, officials said.

Steiner was remanded to federal custody after sentencing. 

caroline.tien@hearst.com

Posted on

FWA (NJ)N.J. wins $1.6M judgment against adviser who allegedly scammed nursing home residents seeking Medicaid

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: He told people he could get them Medicaid coverage for nursing home care, and charged them thousands of dollars each.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.nj.com/news/2021/02/nj-wins-16m-judgment-against-adviser-who-allegedly-scammed-nursing-home-residents-seeking-medicaid.html

 
 

Joe and Leslie Walsh. They hired Advanta Medicaid Specialists to assist Joe’s father Joseph Walsh, Sr., obtain Medicaid for nursing home care, but claimed the company scammed them.Andrew Miller | For NJ Advance Media

The owner of a Lakewood company alleged to have stolen hundreds of thousands of dollars from nursing home residents and their families seeking help with Medicaid applications was hit with a $1.6 million default judgment, state officials said Monday.

Attorney General Gurbir Grewal and the Division of Consumer Affairs secured the judgment against Nissim “Sam” Aryeh of Lakewood, the owner of the now defunct Advanta Medicaid Specialists.

Essex County Superior Court Judge James Paganelli found Aryeh personally liable for 131 violations of the state’s consumer protection laws and regulations, the attorney general’s office said.

The $1,630,194 judgment includes $226,450 in consumer restitution, $1,310,000 in civil penalties and $93,744 in attorneys’ fees and investigative costs, the state said.

It also permanently bars Aryeh from the Medicaid advisory business in the state.

Aryeh could not be reached for comment.

In a civil lawsuit filed in December 2019, the state charged Aryeh and company agent Chaim E. Feller with transferring company funds into their personal accounts to bankroll their own expenses.

State investigators said the firm took more than $300,000 from clients and used the money to pay for meals at high-end restaurants, car payments and furniture, and payments to local private schools and synagogues, and to bankroll expenses at Harrah’s Resort casino in Atlantic City — before it closed.

The investigation started after families reported that Advanta did not provide promised services or it did not provide promised refunds for nursing home residents who were not approved for Medicaid. Consumers paid between $3,000 and $9,000 each for the promised services, it said.

“Hopefully the people he took advantage of in times of having to make difficult family care decisions will be fully reimbursed,” said Leslie Walsh, who paid $6,000 to the company to help with the Medicaid application for her father-in-law, who died before the application was submitted. “However, no amount of money is recompense for the anxiety, frustration and trauma Nissim Sam Aryeh caused for so many people.”

The Walsh family said they never got any money back even though they were promised a refund, although they later won a default judgment against the company that they never were able to collect.

The state’s complaint accused the defendants of violating the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and advertising regulations by failing to submit Medicaid applications for customers, falsely representing to customers that their applications had been submitted, refusing to honor the money-back guarantee and using company monies to bankroll their personal spending.

In a settlement with the Attorney General’s office announced in September, Feller agreed to pay $55,000 in restitution, to refrain from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts in violation of New Jersey’s Consumer Fraud Act and to provide the division with written notice of any future ownership interest in a registered business that offers Medicaid services to New Jersey consumers.

There was no admission of any wrongdoing.

At the time, the judge also entered a default judgment for over $1.66 million against Advanta itself, finding that the company committed 131 violations of the state’s consumer protection laws and regulations. He ordered $281,450 be returned to victims.

The case against Aryeh, though, was not resolved as his attorneys revealed that he was also under criminal investigation.

In filings with the court, his lawyer, A. Ross Pearlson, a former assistant U.S. attorney, said in a motion seeking a delay in the state’s civil proceedings that his client had no intention of settling with the state.

“The threat of Mr. Aryeh being criminally prosecuted is direct, real and ongoing,” Pearlson told the court. “Mr. Aryeh received a target letter from the DCJ (Division of Criminal Justice). In February, the prosecutor in charge of the case represented that the investigation was ‘active and ongoing.'”

The attorney general’s office did not immediately comment on Pearlson’s remarks.

“The defendant in this case participated in a scheme that callously preyed on elderly individuals seeking help in obtaining Medicaid coverage for their long-term care,” Grewal said of Aryeh. “We will continue to pursue these cases to hold businesses and owners accountable for their actions and send a strong message of deterrence to others.”

According to his LinkedIn page, Aryeh currently lists himself as the director of a candle company. Previously, he was listed as director of business development for a Lakewood software developer and a self-employed equity trader. In his filings with the court late last year, his attorney said he was fired and lost that job as a result of the pandemic and was in debt with no income or assets.

He was also no longer paying his lawyer, according to court records.

Reached through his LinkedIn account late last year, Aryeh declined to answer specific questions. But he said he wished to express his “sincerest apologies” to those who were hurt.

“Although it may take some time, I intend on giving a full refund to every person effected (sic) by this unfortunate situation,” he wrote.

Please subscribe now and support the local journalism YOU rely on and trust.

Karin Price Mueller may be reached at KPriceMueller@NJAdvanceMedia.com.

Ted Sherman may be reached at tsherman@njadvancemedia.com. Follow him on Twitter @TedShermanSL. Facebook: @TedSherman.reporter. Find NJ.com on Facebook.

Samantha Marcus may be reached at smarcus@njadvancemedia.com.

Posted on

FWA (CT)- $533K Settlement In Psychiatric Care Center Medicaid Fraud Case

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: He upcoded visits to look like they took more time than they did.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://patch.com/connecticut/newhaven/533k-settlement-psychiatric-care-center-medicaid-fraud-case-ag

Crime & Safety


The deal “resolves allegations that New Haven-based psychiatrist Dr. Kishorchandra Gonsai over billed CT Medicaid for psychotherapy.”

 
 

Ellyn Santiago,

Patch Staff

 
 

Posted Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 3:58 pm ET

 
 

CT AG William Tong announced a $532,830.33 Connecticut False Claims Act settlement with Psychiatric Care Consultants LLC and its owner, Dr. Kishorchandra Gonsai, resolving allegations that the New Haven-based psychiatrist over billed state Medicaid. (Shutterstock)

NEW HAVEN, CT — Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced a $532,830.33 Connecticut False Claims Act settlement with Psychiatric Care Consultants LLC and its owner, Dr. Kishorchandra Gonsai, resolving allegations that the New Haven-based psychiatrist over billed the state’s Medicaid program for psychotherapy.

“Dr. Gonsai and PCC overbilled the state’s Medicaid program over a span of nearly five years for therapy services that were not provided at the level he claimed,” Tong said. “Our settlement forces Dr. Gonsai to return over half a million dollars to the state’s Medicaid program and sends a strong message that the Office of the Attorney General will not tolerate abuse of taxpayer dollars.”
 

Following a fraud referral from the Department of Social Services, an investigation by the Office of the Attorney General found that between June 1, 2017 and March 31, 2022 Psychiatric Care Consultants (PCC) repeatedly billed the Connecticut Medical Assistance Program (CMAP) for either 45-minute or 30-minute psychotherapy sessions that were not provided for the length of time claimed, Tong said.

Find out what’s happening in New Havenwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

PCC billed the CMAP for 45-minute sessions when the amount of psychotherapy provided was 30 minutes or less and also billed the CMAP for 30-minute sessions when the amount of psychotherapy provided was 15 minutes or less, Tong said.

“This unfortunate example of overbilling by a psychiatric care provider is a clear reminder that strong anti-fraud measures are in place to protect the integrity of our public health coverage programs. I join Attorney General Tong in welcoming the return of nearly $533,000 from the False Claims Act settlement, and in commending the investigators and attorneys who were instrumental in this resolution,” state Department of Social Services Commissioner Deidre S. Gifford said.

Find out what’s happening in New Havenwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

The Department of Social Services’ Office of Quality Assurance, Special Investigations Division, assisted in the case, Tong said.

Anyone with knowledge of suspected fraud or abuse in the public healthcare system is asked to contact the Attorney General’s Government Program Fraud Section at 860-808-5040 or by email at ag.fraud@ct.gov; the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit at 860-258-5986 or by email at conndcj@ct.gov; or the Department of Social Services fraud reporting hotline at 1-800-842-2155, online at www.ct.gov/dss/reportingfraud, or by email to providerfraud.dss@ct.gov.

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

Posted on

BH/SUD: Nearly Half Who Leave Rehab for Opioids Don’t Get Follow-Up Care

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: 47% to be exact.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.upmc.com/media/news/102722-medicaid-health-policy

 
 

 
 

PITTSBURGH – Despite strong evidence for the importance of outpatient care after inpatient residential treatment for opioid use disorder, nearly half of Medicaid beneficiaries are not receiving follow-up care or medication-assisted treatment within a month of discharge, according to a new analysis led by University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health scientists.

Discharge from residential treatment is a sensitive time when people with opioid use disorder are at higher risk to relapse. Outpatient treatment with counseling, medication or both can reduce this risk. The findings, published this week in Drug and Alcohol Dependence, are the first to study patient and episode-level factors related to the likelihood of receiving post-discharge follow-up among recipients of Medicaid, which is the largest payer of opioid use disorder-related inpatient stays and emergency department visits. 

 
 

“Over the past few years, Medicaid programs have really expanded the scope of substance use disorder treatments they will cover, including residential treatment,” said lead author Evan Cole, Ph.D., research associate professor in the Department of Health Policy and Management at Pitt Public Health. “But outpatient follow-up is key to predicting long-term recovery, and there is very little research – particularly in the past decade when the opioid epidemic has gripped the U.S. – into whether that critical follow-up care is actually happening.”

An estimated 10 million Americans have misused opioids in the past year, and more than 100,000 people died of drug overdoses in the U.S. last year, the majority after taking opioids, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Residential treatment for substance use disorder – commonly known as “rehab” – includes 24-hour living support with on-site clinical services, which can include counseling and addiction treatment. Most residential treatment stays are less than 30 days. 

Medicaid provides health insurance for low-income or disabled people, and, with more than 88 million enrollees, it is the largest health insurer in the U.S. It covers 38% of people with opioid use disorder. 

Cole and his colleagues looked at data from more than 90,000 residential treatment stays in 2018 and 2019 for Medicaid beneficiaries across 10 states – Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia – using the Medicaid Outcomes Distributed Research Network

Previous research has shown that after leaving residential treatment, timely follow-up for outpatient addiction treatment, which can include medications such as buprenorphine, methadone or naltrexone, reduces relapse and lowers risk of death.  

Cole’s team found that 47% of the time, Medicaid beneficiaries discharged from residential treatment did not receive follow-up care or a medication for opioid use disorder within 30 days. Medicaid enrollees who were male, lived in rural areas or were members of racial and ethnic minority groups were the least likely to receive follow-up care. 

“This was not what we’d hoped to see,” said Cole, who is also research director of the Medicaid Research Center at Pitt. “I’m sure Medicaid programs want people to be engaged in outpatient care to continue their treatment and successfully manage opioid use disorder after residential treatment.”

On a positive note, patients who had been prescribed medications to treat opioid use disorder before they’d been admitted to residential treatment were 24% more likely to get follow-up care and medication after discharge than their counterparts who hadn’t had such a prescription before entering residential treatment. 

Cole hypothesized that previous engagement in addiction treatment made it easier for patients to navigate to treatment after discharge. He said future research could test this by exploring whether patients were seeing the same outpatient provider before and after residential treatment, and, if so, more effort could be made to connect patients to outpatient providers before they enter residential treatment. 

Since Medicaid enrollment soared by 25% during the COVID-19 pandemic, it will be interesting to see if that impacted connection with care after residential treatment, Cole said. He also noted that some states, including Pennsylvania, have become more committed to “warm handoffs,” creating protocols intended to facilitate a seamless transition to addiction treatment after an emergency. 

“While our study wasn’t designed to see the impact of warm hand-off protocols, it certainly indicates that exploring whether or not these programs are working could be worthwhile for future research,” Cole said. 

Additional authors of this study are Lindsay Allen, Ph.D., of Northwestern University; Anna Austin, Ph.D., and Paul Lanier, Ph.D., both of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Andrew Barnes, Ph.D., and Peter Cunningham, Ph.D., of Virginia Commonwealth University; Chung-Chou H. Chang, Ph.D., Joo Yeon Kim, M.S., Lu Tang, Ph.D., and Julie Donohue, Ph.D., all of Pitt; Sarah Clark, M.P.H., and Kara Zivin, Ph.D., both of the University of Michigan; Dushka Crane, Ph.D., and Rachel Mauk, Ph.D., both of The Ohio State University; Carrie E. Fry, Ph.D., of Vanderbilt University; Adam J. Gordon, M.D., M.P.H., of the University of Utah; Lindsey Hammerslag, Ph.D., and Jeff Talbert, Ph.D., both of the University of Kentucky; David Idala, M.A., and Shamis Mohamoud, M.A., both of the Hilltop Institute in Baltimore; Susan Kennedy, M.P.P., M.S.W., and Sunita Krishnan, M.P.H., of Academy Health in Washington, D.C.; Shyama Mahakalanda, Ph.D., of West Virginia University; and Mary Joan McDuffie, M.A., of the University of Delaware.

This research was funded by National Institute on Drug Abuse grant R01DA048029.

 
 


Left photo:

 
 

PHOTO DETAILS: (click images for high-res versions) 


CREDIT: University of Pittsburgh


CAPTION: Evan Cole, Ph.D.

 
 

Bottom photo:  


PHOTO DETAILS: (click images for high-res versions) 


CREDIT:  Cole, et al. Drug and Alcohol Dependence (2022)


CAPTION: Visual Study Abstract

Posted on

NH- Delta Dental would begin Medicaid dental benefits for adults under $33.5 million contract

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Delta beat out 5 other companies. Now they just have to convince the 80% of dentists who don’t take Medicaid to sign on the dotted line.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://newhampshirebulletin.com/briefs/delta-dental-would-begin-medicaid-dental-benefits-for-adults-under-33-5-million-contract/

 
 

The next challenge will be recruiting more dentists to take Medicaid. (Getty Images)

Adults insured by Medicaid may be a step closer to having their dental care covered. On Wednesday, the Executive Council will consider a $33.5 million contract with the Delta Dental Plan of New Hampshire to provide not only oral care but also oral education and transportation to appointments when needed.

The company would have until April to begin providing dental coverage to nearly 88,000 adults on Medicaid and expanded Medicaid under the 15-month contract. The state, which covers oral health care for children on Medicaid, was one of fewer than a dozen that did not also cover adults until legislation passed this year. Only emergency services were covered.

Lawmakers who have tried for more than a decade to expand benefits to adults overcame cost concerns this year by using nearly $21 million in settlement money, secured by the state against a company hired to manage Medicaid pharmacy benefits, to cover the first three years.

The next challenge will be recruiting more dentists to take Medicaid; currently fewer than 20 percent do, in part because of low reimbursement rates, tedious paperwork, and challenges caring for a population with significant health issues and difficulty showing for appointments.

Six companies submitted bids, according to documents provided to the council by the Medicaid division within the Department of Health and Human Services. The team that reviewed the bids scored Delta Dental and the other finalist, MCNA Dental, similarly on a number of program requirements, according to the documents. Delta Dental scored higher on cost savings, quality management, relevant experience, and having an adequate provider network. 

Tom Raffio, president and CEO of Northeast Delta Dental, told the Bulletin in August the company would likely submit a bid and highlight its existing relationship with nearly 851 New Hampshire dentists, 93 percent of all dentists in the state.

The new benefits would have no cap on benefits or copays for preventive services. Other dental care would be capped at $1,500 a year and require a 10 percent copay for those with household incomes above 100 percent of the federal poverty level, which is $27,750 for a family of four.

Coverage for dentures would be provided only for Medicaid recipients with developmental disabilities, acquired brain disorders, people in nursing homes, and those in the Choices for Independence program, which includes the elderly and people with chronic illness or disabilities.

Posted on

CO- Medicaid denials for Colorado children with severe disabilities set off panic

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: The article gives no insight as to why the state made the changes in the first place.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://coloradosun.com/2022/10/28/medicaid-denials-colorado-children-disabilities/

Parents of children with medical needs so severe they need round-the-clock nursing care at home are in “sheer panic” as the state Medicaid program notified them this fall that their services have been denied or reduced. 

At least 20 families have hired legal counsel to fight the denials and about 150 people attended a Medicaid children with disabilities meeting to discuss the denial letters, which were received during the past few weeks. 

Two days before a planned family news conference at the state Capitol, officials from the state Medicaid division Wednesday offered a temporary fix. The Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing — which includes the Medicaid program for people with low incomes or disabilities — announced a 60-day reprieve on pending denials. 

But for families, it’s not enough. They want a permanent solution to an injustice they say the state should have fixed months ago. 

Family has 7 medically fragile children

Several parents gave emotional testimony this month during a medical services board meeting, a governor-appointed, rule-making group for the state department. Board members, after hearing parents speak, strongly urged the department to remedy the issue immediately. 

Katerina and Brad Evers, both nurses, have seven adopted children, all with severe medical needs — feeding tubes, oxygen machines, wheelchairs and 150 prescription medicines among them. The kids, ages 2-16, were all living at Children’s Hospital Colorado with no family capable of taking care of them. 

All have had 24/7 nursing services approved by Medicaid, a requirement of the hospital when each was discharged. But in the past few weeks, the Everses were notified that three of the children’s Medicaid services were cut in half, to 10 or 12 hours per day. They are expecting a similar reduction in services for two other kids with similar medical issues. 

“We are scared to death No. 1 because we don’t know what is going to happen to these children,” Brad Evers told the medical services board. “This is barbaric. This can’t happen this way. They were in the hospital and they didn’t have a mom or a dad.

“They were born broken, and now you are going to break them more because you want to stop some services? They get to call somebody a mom and a dad, and you want to cut hours?”

The family is able to function because the kids’ Medicaid services have paid four daytime nurses and Katerina and Brad to care for them at night, Katerina told The Colorado Sun. The children go to various schools, and some need a nurse with them at school all day. Katerina and Brad try to sleep some during the day, but also take children to doctor’s appointments. 

Families will have services through Dec. 31

Denver attorney Jack Robinson is representing about 20 children who used to have 24-hour services but were partially or fully denied. “This has been catastrophic for these vulnerable children and their families,” said Robinson, who represented a Douglas County family in a 2017 landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that required school districts to provide a higher standard of special education.

The denials, which are sent to families by a state contractor called Kepro, are filled with “glaring errors,” including no notice that state regulation requires that services must stay in place for 60 days after a denial, he said. The letters do not even include a date when services will end, Robinson said. 

This month’s turmoil is the latest point of frustration for Medicaid recipients after the department’s switch to the new contractor last year. Kepro, a national company, handles prior-authorization requests submitted by home health providers and agencies that supply private-duty nurses. Earlier this year, after a high number of denials for home-health services, Medicaid officials put the requirement for prior authorization on hold for those services. But prior authorization has been required for private-duty nursing since November.

Families say the vagueness of the denial letters has contributed to their panic, with many worried that their in-home nurses will quit for fear they won’t get paid or that families might end up owing the state Medicaid division money. 

In an emailed announcement Wednesday, the state Medicaid department said it was initiating a “temporary administrative approval process” through Dec. 31 for children who receive private-duty nursing benefits. The action means that families that received denial notices will still have services until Dec. 31.

In the meantime, the department will collect any required documentation from physicians and other caregivers to “ensure the right level of care is approved in a timely manner,” the announcement said. 

State officials also said they “heard feedback that our notices can be confusing” and that they “will be working to improve those notices over the coming months.” 

Stopping services would violate federal law, attorney says

Exactly how many families have received denials or reduced services is unclear. In a meeting two weeks ago, department officials said that 88% of private-duty nursing services for children were fully approved. Yet the data was from November through mid-August. Many families said they received denial notices after Aug. 15. 

In an interview Thursday, Bonnie Silva, the director of the Office of Community Living at the state department, said she did not yet have updated numbers. But she said the Department of Health Care Policy and Financing is committed to implementing new practices — including training for health agencies about the prior-authorization process and new denial letters that would clearly explain patients’ rights to appeal and keep services until an appeal is settled. 

“As department-level leadership, we were deeply concerned,” Silva said. “It is a core priority for us here at HCPF to make sure we have not just the services but also have policies in place that support people with really complex needs.

“We’ve heard that there are enough concerns and what we want to do is to take the time to really thoroughly evaluate those concerns. We try really hard to thread the needle between the right service package and also make sure that we have the right oversight of that. We certainly heard feedback that there was tension between the two.” 

Advocates for the families said the department’s numbers were incorrect and that more than half of families with that Medicaid benefit have been notified of a reduction in services. 

Katherine Wallat, a senior attorney at the Colorado Center on Law and Policy, warned that the state is not meeting its obligation under a federal law that gives people with disabilities the right to receive services at home instead of institutions. The 1999 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, called Olmstead, says the government must provide community-based services. 

“This current process is not only confusing but it’s unlawful,” Wallat said, adding that the denials have caused “sheer panic.” 

One mother, whose daughter choked and suffered a brain injury at age 2, and who has since adopted five medically fragile children, said she received notice that some of their services will be cut in half. “I am angry, sad and terrified,” Pam Rogers said. 

“What is going to happen to them?”

The department’s announcement of a 60-day pause comes about two weeks after members of the agency’s medical services board asked for an immediate response. 

“It’s urgent that this happen,” said board member Dr. Barry Martin, a physician at University of Colorado Hospital. “For these families, it sounds like it really needs to happen immediately.” 

For the Evers family, the two-month pause is welcome but does not relieve their stress. “I don’t know if it makes me feel better because I don’t know what is going to happen after the 60 days,” Katerina Evers said. 

With the help of two nurses, Katerina planned to bring three children to the Capitol on Friday for the news conference. Brad is taking two others to doctor’s appointments at the hospital.

The Everses feel abandoned by the system after believing their adopted children would always qualify for round-the-clock services at home. They modified their Conifer home to accommodate the children’s equipment, have a landline and generator in case of a power outage, and were inspected by a Medicaid compliance officer. Now, they fear they couldn’t get the kids to school or even leave the house or sleep if their services are reduced.

“So you tell me, please,” she asked, “what is going to happen to them?” 

Posted on

OP-ED: Podcasts – How Medicaid Compromised Long-Term Care (Guest: Stephen Moses)

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: He has a point.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.heartland.org/multimedia/podcasts/how-medicaid-compromised-long-term-care-guest-stephen-moses

Medicaid is no longer a government program to benefit the poor. It’s a system people abuse to the detriment of the long-term care market.

 
 

Poverty is no longer a requirement to qualify for long-term care under Medicaid. An entire industry has cropped up over the years instructing families on how to maximize Medicaid’s loose financial guidelines.  While families save a bundle of money by having the government now pay for this care, the system has had a negative impact on the long-term care market. Reimbursement rates under Medicaid do not cover the actual cost of care which impacts quality and supply.  Families no longer save for long term care knowing that Medicaid can come to the rescue.  Stephen Moses, president of the Center for Long-Term Care Reform, has studied long-term care for decades. He joins the show to discuss the first segment of his new report with the Paragon Institute, “Long Term Care: The Problem.”

Read the report: https://paragoninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/202208_Moses_LongTermCareTheProblem_FINAL_2.pdf

Seventy percent of people who reach age 65 today will require a severe need for long-term care. Long-term care provides medical and social services for those who are unable to care for themselves. 48 percent will receive paid care.  The need spikes after age 85. In ten years, the baby boomers will reach that threshold, causing demand for long-term care to soar.  Due to the loose financial guidelines, even well-off families can qualify for Medicaid coverage. This market manipulation crowds out private long-term care services. Our guest, Stephen Moses is about to release part two of a report which covers the solutions to this Medicaid problem.  His hope is that a new Congress will be open to better alternatives that improve care at more affordable prices.

In the interview, Moses discusses:

1.  How easy is it to get Medicaid to pay for long-term care?

2. How has this compromised the quality of long-term care over the decades?

3. Who will need long term care? Can any of us live independently until we die?

4. Baby boomers…most are now 65…what kind of pressure will that put on long-term care and Medicaid in 10, 20, and 30 years from now?

5. What about counting on family members to care for you? How about covering your care with your own wealth and investments?

Posted on

NC- Report claims NC hospitals made millions on Medicaid

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Translation: Hospitalling is hard, and we shouldn’t question big number mysteries.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.thecharlottepost.com/news/2022/10/28/local-state/report-claims-nc-hospitals-made-millions-on-medicaid/

  

PHOTO | ATRIUM HEALTH

Carolinas Medical Center in Charlotte, seen on Oct. 24, is owned by Atrium Health. Atrium Health, North Carolina’s largest hospital system, has declared publicly that in 2019 it provided $640 million in services to Medicare patients that were never paid for.

 
 

Atrium Health, the largest hospital system in North Carolina, has declared publicly that in 2019 it provided $640 million in services to Medicare patients that were never paid for, by far the largest “community benefit” it provided that year.

Like other nonprofit hospitals around the nation, Atrium logs losses on the federal health insurance program for seniors and people with disabilities as a community benefit to satisfy legal requirements for federal, state, and local tax breaks.

But for the same year that Atrium’s website says it recorded the $640 million loss on Medicare, the hospital system claimed $82 million in profits from Medicare and an additional $37.2 million in profits from Medicare Advantage in a federally required financial document, according to a report released Oct. 25 by the North Carolina state treasurer’s office.

The lack of clarity about whether health systems like Atrium gain or lose money treating Medicare recipients reflects how loosely the federal government regulates the way hospitals calculate their community benefits.

As a result, the analysis of North Carolina hospitals’ financial data concluded, what taxpayers get from local nonprofit hospitals in return for tax exemptions worth billions of dollars a year is unclear.

There is no transparency, no accountability, and no oversight,” said North Carolina State Treasurer Dale Folwell, a Republican who is critical of Atrium and other hospitals’ business practices. “With the hospital cartel, it is always profits over people.”

Atrium did not make officials available for an interview. In a statement, spokesperson Dan Fogleman said the hospital system reported $85 million in services to Medicare patients that weren’t paid for in its most recent cost report to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

“And, as labor, equipment, supplies and inflation continue to drive health care costs higher, the gap between Medicare payments and costs incurred to deliver the quality care we provide has grown in the post-Covid inflationary environment,” Fogleman said.

More than half of the hospitals in the United States are nonprofits or government-run. The federal government requires them to operate emergency rooms open to all patients regardless of their ability to pay, accept patients insured by Medicare, and use surplus funds to improve facilities and patient care to demonstrate they are giving back to the community.

Even though their tax-exempt status is based on charitable acts, nonprofit hospital systems sat on more than $283 billion in assets from stocks, hedge funds, venture capital, and private equity and other investments in 2019, according to a 2021 KHN analysis of IRS filings.

The hospital systems used most of that to produce income and classified only $19 billion, or about 7% of their total investments, as principally devoted to their nonprofit missions, the analysis found.

The new North Carolina report describes how hospitals’ self-reported Medicare profit margins differed from the financial picture they provided to the public through IRS records, annual reports, and community benefit documents.

Although most hospitals have complained of significant Medicare losses, the analysis of data from more than 100 North Carolina hospitals found that most made profits on Medicare from 2015 to 2020.

IRS audits are supposed to protect the public from fraud and abuse, but the system has major gaps, said health economists and federal watchdog groups.

Federal law requires the IRS to review community benefit activities at least once every three years. Yet the agency did not “have a well-documented process to ensure that those activities are being reviewed,” said a 2020 report from the Government Accountability Office.

In response to GAO recommendations, IRS leaders updated the system last year to help ensure the agency could identify cases in which hospitals were suspected of not meeting requirements.

The IRS referred nearly 1,000 hospitals nationwide to its audit division for violations of the Affordable Care Act from 2015 to 2019, but the IRS could not identify if they were related to community benefits, the GAO said.

The tax agency has no authority to determine what activities hospitals must perform to comply with the law, the GAO said. An analysis of IRS data found 30 hospitals that reported no spending on community benefits in 2016, “indicating potential noncompliance,” the report said.

“Perhaps this is the result of the IRS being underfunded,” said Vivian Ho, a health economics professor at Rice University in Houston, who worked on the North Carolina report. “They don’t have the resources to reconsider what information they should seek.”

It is critical that the government collects accurate information from hospitals because the data affects all patients, Ho said.

Federal law forbids IRS employees from discussing tax information submitted to the agency by people or organizations, IRS spokesperson Anthony Burke said in response to questions about how effectively the government monitors hospitals.

Hospitals have long used what they report as losses on Medicare to justify charging patients with private insurance higher prices. According to a study released in 2021 by the Rand Corp., a nonprofit research organization, hospitals across the nation charge private insurers more than what they receive from Medicare for the same services.

In the Affordable Care Act, federal lawmakers mandated that to maintain their tax-exempt status, nonprofit hospitals must conduct a community health needs assessment, maintain a written financial assistance policy, set billing and collections limits, and set a limit on charges.

In written responses to KHN, the North Carolina Healthcare Association, which lobbies on behalf of hospitals, said hospitals provided $1.2 billion in charity care in 2020. It added that those community benefits can include a lot of different activities, such as covering the gap between how much a procedure costs and what a provider is reimbursed, volunteering by staff, and paying for medical outreach programs.

“Providing care to vulnerable populations is part of their nonprofit mission,” the statement said.

Atrium spends millions of dollars per year to provide care to people who need behavioral health care “but have no safety net — even from the state,” the association said.
Fogleman, the Atrium spokesperson, said an advisory commission has consistently told Congress that Medicare payments do not cover the full costs of services at most hospitals, including Atrium’s.

In North Carolina, large hospital systems received $1.8 billion in tax breaks in 2020, according to the state treasurer’s office.

The same year, lobbyists for North Carolina hospitals reported collectively losing $3.1 billion on Medicare, according to the office’s report. Other data shows they made $87 million in profit.

From 2015 to 2020, the report concludes, 35 hospitals posted profits from Medicare each year.

Other hospitals listed in the report did not respond to requests for comment.

The American Hospital Association contends that the federal government reimburses providers significantly less than it costs to care for Medicare recipients. Unlike private insurers, the federal government does not negotiate prices with hospitals. Medicare bases the amount it pays on hospitals’ locations, labor costs, and other factors.

Melinda Hatton, the association’s general counsel, said in a statement that “underpayments” totaled more than $75 billion in 2020. “These data show that few, if any, hospitals break even much less make a profit on the basis of Medicare payments,” she said.

But Glenn Melnick, a health economics and finance professor at the University of Southern California who reviewed the North Carolina data, said no one is certain how nonprofit hospitals are calculating their numbers.

“The nonprofit hospital systems are getting so big, we need greater transparency,” Melnick said. “Health care is amazingly expensive, and it will bankrupt us if we don’t get it under control.”

Nonprofit hospitals receive significantly more in tax breaks than they spend on community investment or charity care, according to a report released this year by the Lown Institute, a think tank in Needham, Massachusetts.

 
 

Using 2019 data from the IRS, researchers found that out of 275 hospital systems across the country, 227 spent less on community investments or charity care than they got in tax breaks. The deficit totaled more than $18 billion, the report said.

Leah Kane is a senior attorney for consumer protection at the Charlotte Center for Legal Advocacy, a nonprofit that provides civil legal assistance to people who cannot afford an attorney. She said her agency receives calls from people who were not offered charity care from hospitals.

She said her group is worried that hospitals are offering charity care to uninsured patients but not to other people, like the underinsured, who don’t have the income to pay thousands of dollars for treatment not covered by their insurance plans.

“People are angry and stressed out,” Kane said. “They don’t know what this [debt] will mean for their lives.”

KHN correspondent Aneri Pattani contributed to this report.

Atrium Health’s response:
 

The North Carolina State Treasurer’s latest attack against health care systems is based on a flawed and incomplete analysis resulting in invalid conclusions. Atrium Health completed a detailed review of the information supplied in the report commissioned by the Treasurer’s office, and it is clear the analysis did not follow the fundamental and basic accounting principle of matching revenue and associated expenses. One example of the many inaccuracies in the Treasurer’s report is that it includes 100% of the revenues associated with lifesaving organ transplant procurement but excludes the expenses. This alone is a $39 million error in the study – at just two of our hospitals.

For abundance of clarity, Atrium Health’s certified 2020 Medicare cost reports, submitted to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, shows Atrium Health incurred unfunded costs of $85 million for care provided at our hospital facilities in North Carolina. When taking into account the full care we provided to Medicare patients in North Carolina across all care locations, including care provided within our doctor’s offices, Atrium Health incurred unfunded Medicare costs of approximately $968 million in 2020.

Our accounting is consistent with the Medicare analysis computed by DataGen, an independent organization that provides health care policy analysis. Additionally, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, an independent congressional agency whose membership includes leading academic and business leaders, has consistently reported to Congress that Medicare payments do not cover the cost of care provided by most hospitals, like Atrium Health.

Atrium Health is one of the largest Medicare providers in North Carolina. What we are paid by Medicare (and Medicaid) is set by the government – it is not negotiable. And, as labor, equipment, supplies and inflation continue to drive health care costs higher, the gap between Medicare payments and costs incurred to deliver care we provide has grown in the post-Covid inflationary environment. The losses we incur are a component of our audited community benefit we compile and report each year to the IRS. Atrium Health is privileged to serve our communities, providing more than $2.46 billion in free and uncompensated and undercompensated care, as well as other community benefits, last year.

Beyond Medicare, Atrium Health’s “for all” mission doubles down on providing health, hope and healing to our patients each day – regardless of their ability or inability to pay for care. In 2021, we provided over $437 million in care to more than 100,000 low income and uninsured patients who never received a bill for the care they received, with an additional 160,000 uninsured patients who automatically received discounts, totaling $150 million, thanks to our financial assistance policies that are designed to ensure access to the best care for underserved individuals and communities.

Posted on

Senior Compliance Analyst – Medicare, Medicaid (Remote)| Highmark Health Careers

Clipped from: https://careers.highmarkhealth.org/explore-jobs/job/j215501-senior-compliance-analyst-medicare-medicaid-remote/?utm_campaign=google_jobs_apply&utm_source=google_jobs_apply&utm_medium=organic

 
 

Company :

Highmark Wholecare

Job Description : 

JOB SUMMARY

This job partners with business units to ensure compliance to rules, regulations, policies, and procedures of governmental, contractual, and/or corporate entities.  Provides consultation and analytic support to assigned functional areas.  Continuously monitors regulatory changes, legislative efforts, industry trends, and/or contract changes.

ESSENTIAL RESPONSIBILITIES

  • Manage and coordinate compliance related processes.
  • Monitor governance and compliance of rules, regulations, policies, and procedures and assist with appropriate audits, as applicable.  Contacts may include legislators, consumers, special interest groups, advocacy agencies, CMS and other regulatory bodies such as DPW.
  • Ensure systems are updated and accurate for compliance. 
  • Responsible for understanding and applying accreditation and regulatory requirements.  May support Regulatory Compliance department to ensure all state renewals, applications, and annual reports are completed accurately and timely.
  • Depending on department may be responsible for one of the following:  the delegation oversight of subcontractors when applicable to ensure compliance with health plan standards and policies and regulatory bodies;  performing and providing oversight of the care management delegation functions of multiple vendors through review of annual assessments, monthly performance reporting and analysis of reports to ensure adherence to regulatory and accreditation standards.
  • Other duties as assigned or requested.

QUALIFICATIONS

Minimum

  • Bachelor Degree required
  • 5 or more years of relevant, progressive experience in the area of specialization

Preferred

  • Master’s Degree preferred
  • Experience in one or more of the following:  healthcare operations, compliance, auditing, investigations, regulatory accreditation, process improvement, project management and/or managed care operations

Knowledge, Skills and Abilities 

  • Strong written and oral communication skills.
  • Strong customer orientation with excellent interpersonal skills, including interview techniques, good judgment, initiative, and discretion in confidential or sensitive matters.
  • Self-starter with the ability to work under pressure independently and as part of a team.
  • Superior decision-making abilities under a variety of circumstances and creative thinking and effective risk mitigation abilities.
  • Strong process improvement and project management skills.
  • Strong analytical ability.
  • Demonstrated ability to effectively interact with all levels within the organization.
  • Proficiency with Microsoft Office software programs and database query tools, and other Internet and Intranet applications and databases.

SCOPE OF RESPONSIBILITY  

Does this role supervise/manage other employees?   

No 

WORK ENVIRONMENT

Is Travel Required? 

No  

Disclaimer: The job description has been designed to indicate the general nature and essential duties and responsibilities of work performed by employees within this job title. It may not contain a comprehensive inventory of all duties, responsibilities, and qualifications required of employees to do this job.

Compliance Requirement: This position adheres to the ethical and legal standards and behavioral expectations as set forth in the code of business conduct and company policies

Highmark Health and its affiliates prohibit discrimination against qualified individuals based on their status as protected veterans or individuals with disabilities, and prohibit discrimination against all individuals based on their race, color, age, religion, sex, national origin, sexual orientation/gender identity or any other category protected by applicable federal, state or local law. Highmark Health and its affiliates take affirmative action to employ and advance in employment individuals without regard to race, color, age, religion, sex, national origin, sexual orientation/gender identity, protected veteran status or disability. 

EEO is The Law

Equal Opportunity Employer Minorities/Women/Protected Veterans/Disabled/Sexual Orientation/Gender Identity ( https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/employers/poster_screen_reader_optimized.pdf )

We endeavor to make this site accessible to any and all users. If you would like to contact us regarding the accessibility of our website or need assistance completing the application process, please contact number below.

For accommodation requests, please contact HR Services Online at HRServices@highmarkhealth.org

California Consumer Privacy Act Employees, Contractors, and Applicants Notice