Posted on

Oregon Health Authority Wants Millions From Feds For Equity Spending

MM Curator summary

 
 

The state has submitted a waiver to address SDH, and is asking for a shared-savings component from CMS.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 
 

Oregon Health Authority officials plan to ask the federal government for millions in funding that will allow communities to determine their unique needs and priorities related to health equity, as part of their next Medicaid application. 

 Potential areas of investment include workforce needs, green spaces or programs to help people obtain housing, but could vary after community input.

The Medicaid application, called a waiver, reflects the authority’s overall goal to make health care equitable for all Oregonians by 2030. As part of that focus, the state wants to address social determinants that can influence a person’s overall health, such as their access to housing, food and social programs.

To accomplish those goals, Oregon hopes the federal government will recognize the state’s efforts to rein-in growth of its health care costs. Oregon officials will ask federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to calculate the federal government’s estimated savings due to Oregon’s 2019 law that caps the per capita growth of health care at 3.4% annually. 

At this point, it’s unclear how much money that may generate for Oregon. State and federal officials would need to negotiate those terms. However, Oregon officials project $16 billion in state, federal and private savings during the next six years due to the state’s Sustainable Health Care Cost Growth Target Program, which started due to the passage of Senate Bill 889 in 2019.

“Oregon plans to ask the federal government to share those savings back with us so that the state can invest it into communities affected by health inequities,” the concept paper says, though the potential negotiated amount is unknown.

Lori Coyner, the authority’s senior Medicaid policy advisor, said: “We plan to ask for shared savings from the federal government to further invest in addressing health equity, but the exact amount has not been determined. We anticipate a significant ask, but it would not run into the billions of dollars.”

That’s a key piece of the concepts behind Oregon’s Medicaid waiver application, which is essentially a five-year plan. The waiver application process lets states seek flexibility from the federal government for how they tailor Medicaid. To succeed, Oregon’s waiver application must  win approval from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services before its current waiver expires on June 30, 2022.

The waiver system establishes health care policy for the more than 30% of Oregonians who are covered by Medicaid, or about 1.4 million people. Oregon’s past Medicaid waiver applications have led to substantial changes. In 2012, Oregon’s waiver allowed the state to set up coordinated care organizations.

Oregon Health Authority officials plan to send the application to federal officials in early 2022. That’s a little later than the state’s earlier target of December. But it’s still enough time for state and federal officials to negotiate the details. 

In early November, the state will release its final concept papers and accept more public input. The authority released draft concepts earlier this year.

The state will release a more detailed draft application in December and accept feedback for a 30-day comment period before sending the document to the federal government.

“While this new timeline is slightly delayed from our original ambitious plan, it reflects the reality of incorporating the important feedback we’ve received so far, as well as our commitment to ensuring non-waiver feedback is routed to right programs for consideration,” Jeremy Vandehey, Health Policy and Analytics director, and Coyner, the senior Medicaid policy advisor, wrote in an email about the timeline. 

Coordinated care organizations, which contract with Oregon as Medicaid insurers, are part of the plan. Oregon officials want CCOs to have more flexibility to spend money on equity-related health measures that may not necessarily be direct health care a patient receives in a clinic or hospital. This means that CCOs would be able to spend 3% of their global budgets on equity-related items. Currently, CCOs have less flexibility and can only spend on those items out of administrative budgets.

“The goal is to give CCOs the ability to continue meeting members’ needs around social determinants of health,” Coyner said in an interview, adding that community voice and input would be key. 

That means there would be a lead entity from the community and a strong community input in the process, Coyner said.

 “Those could be things like building green space for folks to have access to outdoors,” Coyner said. “It could be developing clinics or some kind of social programs that happen right in the community.”

There are limits to the funding, however. While housing support programs could be one option, the health authority will not build new housing complexes. 

If more funding comes Oregon’s way through the waiver, it will be awhile before Oregon communities will see it. Most likely, that wouldn’t happen until at least 2023. 

It could also require changes to CCO contracts, a separate process that would spell out the funding process.

Other preliminary concepts in the waiver application include increasing the number of Oregonians with health insurance, which is currently about 94% and boosting access to care. 

You can reach Ben Botkin at ben@thelundreport.org or via Twitter @BenBotkin1.

Clipped from: https://www.thelundreport.org/content/oregon-health-authority-wants-millions-feds-equity-spending

Posted on

FL- Medicaid waitlist remains long after $95 million infusion

MM Curator summary

 
 

The DD HCBS waiting list will remain after a near-$100M cash infusion this year.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 
 

More than 22,000 people with intellectual and developmental disabilities are on a waiting list for Medicaid services, budget documents show. That’s despite lawmakers targeting $95 million in additional funding this past spring to reduce the backlog.

Florida Agency for Persons with Disabilities Director of Budget Planning and Administration Rose Salinas told members of a House health care spending panel Monday the agency has sent 621 “offers” to people on the waitlist for the Medicaid waiver program called IBudget. An additional 252 offers to people on the waitlist will be sent Oct. 8.

Salinas could not say how many of the 621 people the state notified were enrolled in the iBudget waiver program.

In addition to those offers, Salinas also said the agency, on average, enrolls about 100 people with intellectual or developmental disabilities who are considered “at-risk” in the iBudget program.

iBudget is a Medicaid waiver program that allows people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to receive home and community-based services they require to keep them out of institutions and in the community.

 
 

Medicaid doesn’t traditionally cover home and community-based services people with intellectual and developmental disabilities might require, such as assistance with daily living activities like bathing, dressing and eating. Medicaid does cover more expensive institutional care, though.

Several of the committee members pressed Salinas about reimbursement rates the state pays iBudget support coordinators.

APD was one of three agencies to appear before the committee to discuss legislative budget requests. Governors consider legislative budget requests, or LBRs, as they develop the proposed budget to submit to the Florida Legislature for consideration.

The House Health Care Appropriations Committee panel also heard from Department of Elder Affairs Secretary Richard Prudom, who outlined an austere LBR that includes a $1.4 million request to upgrade information technology and another nearly $505,000 to enhance its Office of Professional Guardians.

The Department of Elder Affairs also proposes in its LBR to transfer the $33.8 million Program for All Care for the Elderly to the state Agency for Health Care Administration.

 
 

Prudom noted the “modest” LBR request was made possible by a $235 million-plus bump in federal funding from the American Rescue Plan.

Prudom said his department is getting $106.7 million to invest in nutrition programs and develop strategies to improve access to mental health services. The department will get another $128 million from the federal government after Congress agreed to increase federal Medicaid funding for home- and community-based services, also from the American Rescue Plan.

Prudom noted the agency is asking the Legislature for authority to hire a Deputy Secretary. Asked by Committee Chair Rep. Bryan Avila whether the agency could spread the work a deputy secretary would take across existing positions, Prudom said no.

“We’re a pretty lean agency,” Prudom said.

The panel also heard from the Department of Veterans Affairs. Among other things, that department is requesting $1.4 million in general revenue to beef up pay for nurses at veteran facilities and another $13.8 million to increase its contracting budget.

The panel will hear from other health-care-related agencies next month, including the Agency for Health Care Administration, the Department of Health, and the Department of Children and Families.

Clipped from: https://floridapolitics.com/archives/458900-medicaid-waitlist-remains-long-after-95-million-infusion/

 
 

 
 

Posted on

15 million people may lose Medicaid coverage when public health emergency ends

MM Curator summary

 
 

Most who lose their Medicaid coverage are expected to have employer-based or subsidized exchange coverage when the PHE ends.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

By Maria Marabito

Source/Disclosures

Source:

What will happen to unprecedented high Medicaid enrollment after the public health emergency? https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2021/09/what-will-happen-to-unprecedented-high-medicaid-enrollment-after-the-public-health-emergency.html. Published Sept. 15, 2021. Accessed Sept. 16, 2021.

Disclosures: Buettgens reports no relevant financial disclosures.

ADD TOPIC TO EMAIL ALERTS

Please provide your email address to receive an email when new articles are posted on Primary Care: Practice Management.

ADDED TO EMAIL ALERTS

You’ve successfully added Primary Care: Practice Management to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

You’ve successfully added Primary Care: Practice Management to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts



 

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.


 

A new report showed that about 15 million Americans who enrolled in Medicaid during the public health emergency could lose coverage when the emergency declaration ends.

Those at risk for losing coverage include almost 9 million adults and 6 million children, according to the analysis published by the Urban Institute with support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

aid coverage saves lives and increases families’ financial stability. Becoming uninsured would adversely affect both,” Matthew Buettgens, PhD, a senior fellow in the Health Policy Center at the Urban Institute, told Healio Primary Care. “Many of those losing Medicaid would be eligible for other types of health coverage, and states can substantially reduce the number becoming uninsured by providing effective outreach and assistance.”

Buettgens and coauthor Andrew Green, MSDSPP, a research analyst in the Health Policy Center at the Urban Institute, analyzed state enrollment patterns from February 2020 to January 2021 using Medicaid enrollment data from CMS and individual state Medicaid websites for all available months in 2020 and 2021. They projected possible disenrollment scenarios for 2022.

By the end of the second quarter of 2020, about 62.5 million nonelderly people were enrolled in Medicaid. Following this period, enrollment increased by about 1% each month. Buettgens and Green said they expect this trend to continue while the emergency declaration is still in place. By the second quarter of 2021, they approximated that 72 million nonelderly people were enrolled.

Moreover, Buettgens and Green estimated that 17 million more nonelderly people will be enrolled in Medicaid at the end of 2021 compared with enrollment prior to the pandemic. Overall, an estimated 76.3 million individuals aged younger than 65 years would be enrolled, according to Buettgens and Green.

In a scenario where the emergency declaration is lifted at the end of 2021, the researchers predicted that 15 million people would lose coverage in 2022, while one-third of adults would potentially qualify for subsidized private health coverage in the Healthcare Marketplace. The remaining individuals without coverage would likely have access to employer coverage through their family or be eligible for other sources of subsidized coverage, the authors wrote. If the American Rescue Plan Act is made permanent, one-third of adults losing coverage would be eligible for Marketplace premium tax credits.

Among the children losing coverage, only 57% would be eligible for the Children’s Health Insurance Program, and 9% would be eligible for Marketplace coverage with tax credits, according to the authors. These alternatives to Medicaid will likely cost families much more, Buettgens and Green wrote. They projected that 7 million people will become disenrolled in the first half of 2022.

However, the tax credits would make private health coverage more affordable, according to Buettgens.

 
 

Read next

“If a patient has lost Medicaid, a physician could suggest that they check with HealthCare.gov or their state Marketplace to see if they qualify,” he said.

Clipped from: https://www.healio.com/news/primary-care/20210921/15-million-people-may-lose-medicaid-coverage-when-public-health-emergency-ends

 
 


 

Posted on

Indiana Medicaid Announces New Reimbursement for COVID-19 Ready Nursing Facilities

MM Curator summary

 
 

Nursing homes will be paid more to keep COVID-positive residents at their own facilities.

 
 

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

Sept. 21 Update:  This article has been updated with new information about the effective date of the reimbursement for COVID-19 Ready Nursing Facilities.

 
 

On the afternoon of September 20, 2021, Indiana Medicaid released a new policy increasing reimbursement for COVID-19 Ready nursing facilities.  The policy is in response to the need to ease the growing stresses on the state’s hospital capacity by helping nursing facilities offset the growing and large costs for operating COVID-19 units.  The effective dates for qualifying providers are dates of services between September 20, 2021 and October 16, 2021.  Facilities submitting an attestation form in the month of September will have reimbursements begin back to September 20, 2021.  Facilities that submit attestations on October 1, 2021 or after will have reimbursements start the date of the submission of the attestation.

The temporary increases are 4% per patient day (all Medicaid patients in the facility) for facilities that attest to being COVID-19 Ready and an additional $230 per COVID-19 positive resident.

Qualifying as a COVID-19 Ready Facility

Each nursing facility desiring to become COVID-19 Ready must follow and attest to the below Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) COVID-19 Ready requirements.  The COVID-19 Ready Attestation Statement is linked below.

  • Follow IDOH COVID-19 Long-Term Care (LTC) Standard Operating Procedures and IDOH COVID-19 Infection Prevention (IP) Toolkit, located on the Professional Resources page at coronavirus.in.gov.
  • Follow IDOH LTC hospital transfer guidance or have developed a mutually agreed upon plan with local hospitals for admission and readmission of COVID-19 patients.
  • Follow IDOH, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) communication guidelines.
  • Accept COVID-19 new admissions, readmissions and transfers.
  • Share complete COVID-19 status information with transportation providers serving residents.
  • Follow IDOH, CMS and CDC reporting requirements for new COVID-19 cases and deaths involving residents and staff.
  • Provide daily updates of COVID-19 bed capacity and changes in admission status (for example, admissions hold) in the EMResource system at emresource.juvare.com.

 
 

  • When making the first entry, enter the facility’s current admissions status and capacity.

Attestation Process

  • Facilities must complete the COVID-19 Ready Attestation Statement to Derris Harrison at Derris.Harrison@fssa.in.gov
    and
  • Update their COVID-19 Ready status in EMResource.  The facility must enter “yes” in the LTC COVID Ready Facility Status Column.

 COVID-19 Resident Reimbursement

To obtain the temporary $230 per resident daily add-on, up to 21 days, a facility must:

  • Submit the COVID-19 Ready Attestation Statement to Derris Harrison at Derris.Harrison@fssa.in.gov; and
  • Bill claims for COVID-19 positive residents with the primary diagnosis code of U07.1 – COVID-19 positive.

Nursing facilities will be paid the temporary add-on for the full 21-days when the following are true:

  • The resident is in a COVID-19 Ready facility.
  • The resident is COVID-19 positive between Sept. 20, 2021, and Oct. 16, 2021.
  • Claims had U07.1 as the primary diagnosis.
  • The resident was not discharged prior to the 21 days for any reason, including death, transfer to another facility or being sent home.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.ihca.org/resource/indiana-medicaid-announces-new-reimbursement-for-covid-19-ready-nursing-facilities/

Posted on

CMS Investing $15M in Medicaid Mobile Health Crisis Intervention

MM Curator summary

 
 

CMS is seeding innovations in how first responders can deliver on-scene behavioral health crisis services.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

The rescue plan funds will be used by state Medicaid programs and community health groups to develop mobile health intervention services for people experiencing a behavioral health or opioid use disorder crisis.

 
 

Source: Getty Images

 
 

By Eric Wicklund

September 21, 2021 – Federal authorities are awarding $15 million in rescue plan funding to 20 states to help expand mobile health intervention services for Medicaid patients in crisis.

The planning grants, administered through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, will help state Medicaid agencies and community health organizations develop emergency intervention services for people experiencing a mental health or substance abuse disorder crisis. This may include the use of mHealth apps or telehealth services to connect those in crisis to a behavioral health specialist or other care provider.

“With these grants, CMS is taking strides to connect individuals in crisis with the high-quality, expert care they need. Providing behavioral health care experts as alternatives to police is an example of how we can better help communities deliver on the behavioral health needs of all its residents,” CMS Administrator Chiquita Brooks-LaSure said in a press release.

Programs like this are designed to connect people to healthcare providers during an emergency, rather than using police intervention or transports to a jail or hospital. In some instances police and EMS units are provided with tablets or apps to connect with care providers at the scene for a virtual consult, while other programs create multi-disciplinary teams capable of responding in person or via connected health channels.

The interventions are designed to not only take pressure off of police to deal with mental health emergencies, but to improve access to care and speed up treatment for people in crisis.

The funding will be used to develop and launch Medicaid-based 24-hour community-based mobile crisis intervention services, offering training and technical assistance.

States receiving the grants are Alabama, California, Colorado, Delaware, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, New Mexico, Nevada, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, Wisconsin and West Virginia.

Officials say all states should be eligible for a temporarily enhanced matching rate for implementing a qualified community-based mobile crisis intervention option in the Medicaid programs by April 2022.

Clipped from: https://mhealthintelligence.com/news/cms-investing-15m-in-medicaid-mobile-health-crisis-intervention

 
 

 
 

Posted on

OIG: Most states not doing enough to monitor Medicaid telehealth fraud for behavioral health services

MM Curator summary

 
 

The report implies that states have very little idea about what is going on with their telehealth programs.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 
 

A new survey of 37 states found that three didn’t know which Medicaid behavioral health services are offered via telehealth compared to in person, an Office of Inspector General report found.

Many states don’t monitor for telehealth fraud and fail to evaluate how telehealth has impacted patient access and care, a Department of Health and Human Services watchdog found.

The agency’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) released a report Tuesday that explored how states are evaluating the use of telehealth to treat behavioral health in Medicaid. While states have increasingly turned to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic, OIG found that a few don’t even know what services are offered virtually.

“As the nation confronts the psychological and emotional impact of COVID-19, the use of telehealth will be important in addressing behavioral health needs for Medicaid enrollees,” the report said.

Telehealth can be used to cover several behavioral health services such as mental health assessments and therapy. This reliance has increased since the pandemic that caused patients to stay home for fear of contracting the virus.

But the report finds states still have a way to go if telehealth flexibilities offered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services become permanent.

OIG spoke with Medicaid directors for 37 states that provide telehealth behavioral services.

RELATED: New House, Senate bills aim to make telehealth expansion permanent in Medicare, Medicaid

The agency found only two states have evaluated the effectiveness of telehealth on access to services for Medicaid enrollees.

One of the states found that 70% of enrollees who used telehealth for behavioral services resided in a rural area and would have to be transported a long distance to get care without it. Another found telehealth increased the types of providers beneficiaries could access such as psychiatrists, psychologists and nurse practitioners that specialize in mental health.

Only one of the 37 states evaluated the impact of telehealth on cost. It found that prior to the pandemic, telehealth generated $8,600 in savings for emergency room care avoidance in one managed care plan and $484,000 in reduced transportation costs for another plan.

OIG also found that three of the 37 states couldn’t say which services are provided to Medicaid beneficiaries via telehealth compared to in person.

“These states cannot do any analysis on the effects of telehealth, nor do they have the ability to perform basic monitoring and oversight specific to telehealth services, which are essential to ensuring the fiscal integrity of the Medicaid program and to protecting Medicaid enrollees,” the report said.

States are already providing a small amount of monitoring and oversight on telehealth. OIG found that 11 out of the 37 states perform monitoring and other actions to combat any fraud or waste in telehealth. But 23 out of the 37 states report fraud is a major concern surrounding telehealth use.

Even though Medicaid is a federal-state joint program, states are responsible for monitoring.

A few states told OIG it is difficult to verify that telehealth services are being provided appropriately.

States need to step up their efforts to evaluate and examine the impact of telehealth on their Medicaid programs, especially as flexibilities that emerged during the pandemic could be made permanent, OIG said.

“Evaluating the effects of telehealth on access, cost and quality of behavioral health services is particularly important in helping states make decisions about how best to use telehealth and about which populations benefit most from these services,” OIG said.

RELATED: Telehealth use drops for 3rd straight month as patients return to in-person appointments

An accompanying data brief from OIG (PDF) also found that states have had major challenges with implementing behavioral telehealth services. The brief looked at state challenges from January through February 2020 before the onset of the pandemic.

Most states reported multiple challenges with using telehealth, including a lack of training for providers and enrollees, limited internet connectivity for providers and enrollees, difficulties with providers protecting the privacy and security of enrollees’ personal information, and the cost of telehealth infrastructure and interoperability issues for providers,” the brief said.

The findings act as a clarion call to states to prepare for potential permanent expansion of telehealth after the pandemic subsides. States can decide how to apply telehealth in their Medicaid programs.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payer/oig-most-states-not-doing-enough-to-monitor-medicaid-telehealth-fraud-for-behavioral-health

 
 

 
 

Posted on

Civil rights groups file complaint over DC Medicaid dispute

MM Curator summary

 
 

Advocates are framing MedStar’s tactics as a health equity issue.

 
 

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

Advocates for D.C.’s Medicaid recipients have filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services over threatened changes to the D.C. Medicaid program.

The groups, including the D.C. branch of the NAACP and the Health Alliance Network, a community organization devoted to health equity, have written to the HHS Office for Civil Rights, complaining that the health of the city’s Medicaid recipients is imperiled by MedStar Health’s dispute with the District government over its Medicaid contract.

The groups pointed to an Aug. 20 letter penned by the D.C. Department of Health Care Finance to the D.C. Council Committee on Health, which said that MedStar Health intends to terminate its contracts with AmeriHealth Caritas DC and CareFirst Blue Cross Blue Shield, two Medicaid managed health care programs operating in the District.

MedStar, which operates two of the city’s largest hospitals, MedStar Washington Hospital Center and MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, has been in a long-standing dispute with the D.C. government over the Medicaid managed care contract of its subsidiary, MedStar Family Choice.

The D.C. Contract Appeals Board ruled last December against MedStar Family Choice’s Medicaid contract with the city. Mayor Muriel Bowser issued an emergency order this month extending that contract and the other two, despite the CAB ruling. But with contracts set to expire at the end of the month, the D.C. Council passed a resolution disapproving of the mayor’s emergency order extending the contracts.

The civil rights and advocacy groups speaking out against MedStar’s threat to end Medicaid contracts with the two insurance companies that provide Medicaid health coverage to the city’s poor.

“MedStar’s actions jeopardize the lives, the health and the safety of over 200 thousand vulnerable DC residents on Medicaid, A majority of whom are “Black and Brown people,” said NAACP D.C. branch president Ali Akosua.

The D.C. Department of Health Care Finance said the action would threaten access to care for as many as 230,000 District residents.

“MedStar Health is using its market share leverage to bully the District into contract renegotiations and threatened to raise the discount pricing they have made to other managed care organizations, jeopardizing the health, well-being and health services access for hundreds of thousands of Black and Brown residents,” said Ambrose Lane, chairman of the Health Alliance Network.

In a statement to WTOP, spokeswoman Marianne Worley said MedStar Health has an unwavering history of caring for all patients in D.C. and its intent has never been to cancel contracts and leave the District’s most vulnerable residents without care.

“MedStar Health’s notifications to the other two Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) in the Medicaid Managed Care program were intended to prompt renegotiation of the existing provider agreements,” Worley said. “Such notices are a routine way to initiate negotiations and occur across our industry as a normal part of how healthcare is delivered and financed.”

With the mayor and the D.C. Council at odds over the Medicaid contracts, the D.C. Department of Health Care Finance warned that if the current contracts between the health plans and MedStar expire Sept. 30, D.C. Medicaid patients will be left without access to MedStar hospitals, clinics, rehabilitation facilities and a network of physicians.

 
 

Clipped from: https://wtop.com/dc/2021/09/civil-rights-groups-file-complaint-over-dc-medicaid-dispute/

 
 

 
 

Posted on

Aetna misrepresented network to secure Pennsylvania Medicaid contract, lawsuit claims

MM Curator summary

 
 

A whistleblower alleges that Aetna management was aware that the network was inadequate but did not disclose it to the state.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 
 

A whistleblower lawsuit alleges Aetna misrepresented its network to land lucrative Medicaid contracts in Pennsylvania. (Mark Van Scyoc/Shutterstock.com)

A newly unsealed whistleblower lawsuit claims that Aetna misrepresented its provider network to secure lucrative Medicaid contracts in Pennsylvania.

The suit was originally filed in 2017 and saw an amended complaint in January, which was unsealed earlier this month. In the suit, former care management nurse Carol Wessner said she reported multiple times to superiors at Aetna Better Health of Pennsylvania that patients were being assigned to primary care doctors who were falsely represented as in-network.

Aetna Better Health of Pennsylvania CEO Jason Rottman and Alice Rottman, director of its quality management division, told Wessner to “refrain from recording her findings in writing and, ultimately, to stop reporting her findings altogether,” according to the lawsuit.

Wessner also says she was fired in retaliation for repeatedly attempting to report her findings.

RELATED: PhRMA files federal lawsuit to get rid of controversial Medicaid drug rebate rule

Aetna, which is now a subsidiary of CVS Health, said in a statement to Fierce Healthcare that it intends to “vigorously defend itself” if the case moves forward.

“Aetna is pleased that after reviewing all of the evidence, the government chose not to participate in the lawsuit. Aetna denies the allegations in the complaint, and intends to vigorously defend itself should the relator choose to move forward with her non-intervened complaint,” the insurer said. “Aetna places the highest priority on the health and wellbeing of its members, and we provide access to quality care through a comprehensive provider network, including in Pennsylvania.”

“Plaintiff’s allegation that Aetna has network adequacy deficiencies across the country is irresponsible and unrelated to the DOJ’s investigation,” Aetna said.

Medicaid managed care organizations are contractually held to network adequacy standards. In Pennsylvania, MCOs are paid in a capitated per member, per month model, with the insurer covering their medical costs.

As such, if a member is seeing a PCP that is unavailable, they’re less likely to seek out care, reducing what the MCO is paying out without cutting their intake from the state’s Medicaid program. This was the financial incentive behind the scheme, according to the lawsuit.

The false networks were crucial to Pennsylvania’s decision to award contracts to Aetna in 2010 and 2014, according to the lawsuit.

“ABHP is aware that its provider network does not meet its contractual adequacy standards,” the lawsuit says. “However, in both the contract procurement and in periodic reporting, ABHP represented to the government that ABHP’s network did meet its contractual adequacy standards.”

Clipped from: https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payer/aetna-misrepresented-network-to-secure-pennsylvania-medicaid-contract-lawsuit-claims

Posted on

Aetna Barred From Suing Over North Carolina Medicaid Bid Denial

MM Curator summary

 
 

The MCO seems to have reached the end of the appeals process.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

Aetna Better Health of North Carolina’s lawsuit protesting its loss of a bid to operate a Medicaid managed care prepaid service is barred because the company didn’t comply with rules for judicially appealing the decision, a state court said Tuesday.

Noncompliance with a state law that sets out mandatory provisions for appealing administrative agency decisions requires the appeal’s dismissal, the North Carolina Court of Appeals said.

North Carolina is in the process of transitioning its Medicaid plan from a fee-for-service model to a managed care model. Aetna unsuccessfully bid for a prepaid health contract and protested its loss through …

 
 

Clipped from: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/aetna-barred-from-suing-over-north-carolina-medicaid-bid-denial

 
 

 
 

Posted on

User Acceptance Tester (Business Process Analyst 1) | Ohio Department of Medicaid

 
 

The Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) is committed to improving the health of Ohioans and strengthening communities and families through quality care. In 2020, ODM introduced a new vision for Ohio’s Medicaid program — one that strengthens Ohio’s future and ensures everyone has the chance to live life to its full potential.


Today, more than 90 percent of Ohio Medicaid members are supported by managed care organizations. During the year ahead, ODM will begin implementing a new vision for care; focusing on the individual, a strong partnership among MCOs and the department, and supporting specialization in addressing critical needs.


A program that puts the individual first


They Are


Adopting Governor DeWine’s philosophy of service to Ohioans, ODM embarked on an aggressive effort to redesign its managed care program. The goal is to provide more personal, holistic care and supports for millions of Ohioans served by Medicaid. Listening to feedback from more than 1,100 individuals and organizations we identified five procurement goals that would put the individual front and center of Medicaid’s program and policy decisions.

  • Emphasize a personalized care experience
  • Improve care for children and adults with complex behavioral health needs
  • Improve wellness and health outcomes
  • Support providers in better patient care
  • Increase program transparency and accountability

UNLESS REQUIRED BY LEGISLATION OR UNION CONTRACT, STARTING SALARY WILL BE SET AT STEP 1 OF THE PAY RANGE


Office: Operations


Bureau: MITS & Systems Operation


Classification: Business Process Analyst 1 (PN 20093908)


Job Overview


The Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) is seeking to fill a position in its MITS & Systems UAT unit. The position will support ongoing User Acceptance Testing (UAT) for system enhancements and defects. As a User Acceptance Tester, your responsibilities will include:

  • participating in User Acceptance Testing (UAT)
  • developing User Acceptance Testing cases and scripts
  • utilizing test management tools
  • analyzing business requirements and design documents
  • coordinating and providing training to business areas
  • gathering and identifying relevant documentation for test script development
  • compiling intermittent activity and testing status reports or ad hoc statistical reports

The preferred candidate will have extensive testing knowledge and strong analytical skills.


Completion of undergraduate core program in computer science, information systems, or business administration; 12 mos. combined work experience in any combination of the following: creating and coordinating technical and business requirements for processes, projects and procedures, working with business users and technical staff to develop strategies and leading modification or creation of new systems for implementation of information technology solutions.

  • Or completion of associate core program in computer science or information systems; 18 mos. combined work experience in any combination of the following: creating and coordinating technical and business requirements for processes, projects and procedures, working with business users and technical staff to develop strategies and leading modification or creation of new systems for implementation of information technology solutions.
  • Or 36 mos. combined work experience in any combination of the following: creating and coordinating technical and business requirements for processes, projects and procedures, working with business users and technical staff to develop strategies and leading modification or creation of new systems for implementation of information technology solutions.
  • Or equivalent of minimum class qualifications for employment noted above.

Primary Location


United States of America-OHIO-Franklin County-Columbus


Work Locations


Lazarus 4


Organization


Ohio Department of Medicaid


Classified Indicator


Classified


Bargaining Unit / Exempt


Bargaining Unit


Schedule


Full-time


Work Hours


8:00AM – 5:00PM


Compensation


$28.80/hour


Unposting Date


Oct 5, 2021, 11:59:00 PM


Job Function


Information Technology


Job Level


Individual Contributor


Agency Contact Information


HumanResources@medicaid.ohio.gov

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/user-acceptance-tester-business-process-analyst-1-at-ohio-department-of-medicaid-2722973560/?utm_campaign=google_jobs_apply&utm_source=google_jobs_apply&utm_medium=organic