Posted on

Elimination of Medicaid Rebate Cap in the Latest COVID-19 Relief Package—The First Legislative Action on Drug Pricing Under the Biden Administration

MM Curator summary

The current COVID relief bill still has the removal of the drug rebate cap for Medicaid drugs.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 
 

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, the US$1.9 trillion stimulus package expected to be passed by Congress and signed into law by President Biden by March 14, 2021, contains the first drug pricing legislative action being taken under the new Biden administration.

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 includes a provision that eliminates the statutory cap on rebates drug manufacturers pay to Medicaid. These rebates act as a discount off the purchase price and eliminating the cap means that drug company discounts paid to Medicaid can rise. Prior to this change, drug manufacturers could have paid up to 100 percent of the Average Manufacturer Price in rebates to state Medicaid programs for Medicaid-covered drugs.1

Starting in January 2024, Medicaid rebates will no longer be capped at 100 percent of the Average Manufacturer Price, which means a manufacturer may in essence have to pay Medicaid when its drug is used.2 The Biden administration removed the rebate cap, which had been in effect since 2010,3 despite reports that net prices for drugs are declining, and despite criticism that eliminating the cap might result in higher initial launch prices for new drugs and cost shifting to commercial insurance and to Medicare.

The removal of this overall limit on Medicaid rebate obligations—which means no ceiling on the discounts drug companies pay to the statemarks the Biden administration’s first legislative action on drug pricing. The action is in line with President Biden’s campaign proposals on drug pricing, but whether this action signals more activity at the federal level on drug pricing in 2021 remains unclear.

In 2020, most of the drug pricing activity was at the state level, as efforts by the Trump administration eventually stalled in court or were put on hold by the Biden administration, although the December 2020 COVID-19 relief package included provisions directed at increasing drug price transparency.4

The Medicaid Rebate Cap

The Medicaid Drug Rebate Program was created to ensure that Medicaid pays the lowest or best price a manufacturer charges other payers for the drug, and it requires manufacturers to pay set rebates off the Average Manufacturer Price (“AMP”), or the difference between the AMP and best price,5 whichever is greater, for brand drugs purchased by Medicaid.6 The AMP is the average price paid by wholesalers and by retail community pharmacies that purchase drugs directly from manufacturers.7

Medicaid also requires manufacturers to pay an additional rebate when the price of a drug increases faster than the rate of inflation, which acts to essentially limit price increases for Medicaid to the rate of inflation.8 Since 2010, pursuant to Section 1927(c)(2)(D) of the Social Security Act, the total Medicaid rebate amount a drug manufacturer was required to pay was capped at 100 percent of the AMP,9 so that manufacturers would never have to pay a rebate higher than the statutory average purchase price. Accordingly, once the total rebates a manufacturer pays to Medicaid for a drug reaches the 100 percent rebate cap, the manufacturer is not required to pay additional rebates if the drug price continues to outpace inflation.

Overview of the Legislative Change

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, in Section 9816, terminates Section 1927(c)(2)(D) of the Social Security Act at the end of 2023, which will eliminate the rebate cap of 100 percent of the AMP.10 The House Committee on Energy and Commerce proposed the new provision in the 2021 legislation as a part of its broader legislative recommendations for the Medicaid program under Congress’s budget reconciliation directive.11

Implications

1. Implications of Medicaid Cap Removal

Without a cap on the rebates drug manufacturers are required to pay under Medicaid, manufacturers may be required to compensate states in an amount greater than what the state Medicaid programs pay for the drug. This could effectively mean that drug manufacturers might have to pay states for the use of certain drugs in their Medicaid programs, which already pay the lowest price across federal programs due to the effect of statutorily required rebates.12

The policy change will have the largest impact on brand drugs whose prices have been or will be consistently raised and have reached the 100 percent rebate cap.13 Former Health and Human Services (“HHS”) Secretary Alex Azar reported that in 2019 more than 2,300 drugs were at the 100 percent cap on rebates.14 When a brand drug reaches the 100 percent rebate cap, under existing law, the brand drug manufacturer is already effectively receiving zero net revenue from Medicaid use of the drug and in some instances may be providing the drug to the states for free (before considering any fees paid to pharmacies for dispensing).

Proponents view the elimination of the cap as a way not only to lower net prices for states through rebates that could potentially be greater than the purchase price, but also to deter further steep price increases.15 The Congressional Budget Office estimates that removing the cap on rebates would save the federal government approximately US$15.9 billion over the ten-year period 2021 – 2030.16 Commentators, however, doubt that removing the rebate cap will change the calculus for the broader drug market because Medicaid makes up only about ten percent of it.17

Pharmaceutical manufacturer trade groups, such as the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), have criticized the elimination of the rebate cap, highlighting reports that indicate removing the cap may lead to higher launch prices, increased costs for commercial and Medicare buyers, and decreased innovation on drugs that have high Medicaid usage.18 Further, reports have shown that the net price of drugs has declined in the last two years, while overall health care price growth has increased.19 Despite reports of a decline in net drug prices and criticism of eliminating the 100 percent rebate cap, the provision passed through the House and the Senate and is expected be approved by the House pursuant to the budget reconciliation procedure, and to be signed into law by President Biden by March 14, 2021.

2. Looking Forward on Drug Pricing Regulation Under the Biden Administration

Elimination of the Medicaid rebate cap provision is the first legislative measure under the Biden administration on drug pricing.

Lowering drug prices was a key policy goal of the Trump administration; however, the administration largely failed to achieve its objectives. Notably, President Trump issued four executive orders in the last months of his term that made headlines as they focused on reducing the cost of insulin and injectable epinephrine to low-income individuals, allowing importation of drugs from other countries at lower prices, eliminating the anti-kickback safe harbor protections for rebates paid to pharmacy benefit managers and insurers but allowing rebates to consumers at the point of sale, and establishing a most favored nation (“MFN”) pricing model for Medicare drug payments based on international drug prices.20

Each of these executive orders reached the rulemaking stage in the waning days of the Trump administration but received criticism and concern from major industry stakeholders and ultimately stalled.21 The rules relating to the rebate safe harbor, the MFN model, and drug importation faced numerous legal challenges from industry trade groups, with courts delaying implementation of the rebate rule and enjoining implementation of the MFN rule.22 President Biden paused the rulemaking procedure for all four late-issued rules from the Trump administration until March 22, 2021.23

While it remains to be seen whether the Biden administration will go forward with any of the rules begun under the Trump administration, or with any other initiatives on drug pricing advanced by the previous administration, drug pricing and lowering health care costs were a central point of the Biden campaign. President Biden has said that he supports several proposals to address public concern about high drug pricing, including requiring manufacturers to pay a Medicaid-style inflationary rebate for Medicare, allowing Medicare to negotiate rebates directly with manufacturers, and international reference pricing for newly launched specialty drugs.24

Further, while the CARES Act was silent on drug pricing and instead focused on the drug supply chain,25 the COVID-19 relief package passed in December of 2020 contained provisions related to drug pricing transparency, including reporting by health plans on the cost of their highest-spend drugs and the impact manufacturer rebates have on premiums.26 The Medicaid rebate provision in the American Rescue Plan Act goes a step further by acting to regulate rebates paid by manufacturers.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=91155dd2-193e-4333-b0e4-32eca3bcbfc2

 
 

 
 

Posted on

House Plans Medicaid, Drug Price Reforms: Stimulus Update

MM Curator summary

 
 

Under the current bill, Medicaid will get $350B (18%) of the pandemic relief package. Vaccines and testing will get 3%.

The bill would also change the cap on drug prices used in Medicaid rebate calculations.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

Major changes to Medicaid are included in the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s stimulus proposal. State and local governments will receive $350 billion in aid, according to a draft of a stimulus bill. House Democrats have budgeted for commodity purchases to help U.S. farms. President Joe Biden backed a proposal for quicker phase-outs of planned $1,400 stimulus checks. House and Senate Democrats are clashing on the design of expanded support for the unemployed, an early sign of the intra-party squabbling in the $1.9 trillion pandemic relief bill in the coming weeks.

The debate comes as the House continues to release elements of the bill. A dozen different House committees are working on the specific components of Biden’s plan and releasing their portions as they go along.

The House aims to vote on the full bill during the week of Feb. 22. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has pledged to secure congressional passage by the mid-March expiration of enhanced jobless benefits approved in the December aid package.

Bill Envisions Big Changes to Medicaid Program (11:19 p.m.)

The House Energy and Commerce Committee’s stimulus proposal would make big changes to Medicaid. It offers states more money to expand their public health insurance programs for the poor and gives them the ability to claw back money from price increases of certain drugs.

The plan, released late Tuesday night, would end Medicaid drug rebate caps, which are currently set at 100% of a drug’s average manufacturer price, for certain medicines. Once that cap is reached, drug makers can raise their prices without increasing the net rebates that must be paid. A congressional advisory committee warned in 2019 that ending the rebate cap could prompt drug companies to leave the Medicaid program or reduce research.

The legislation would also permit states to restart Medicaid benefits for people in prison 30 days before their release, making it easier to extend addiction treatment and other services, and to extend the program to women for a year after they’ve given birth.

The plan has $14.2 billion for vaccines-related activities. Community health centers also would receive $7.5 billion and $6 billion goes to tribal health centers. The legislation has $7.5 billion for the expansion of internet access. Chairman Frank Pallone’s draft would also provide $46 billion for Covid-19 testing, tracing, monitoring and mitigation. The committee has planned a Thursday vote on the provisions. – Alexander Ruoff and Erik Wasson

Democrats Back $350 Billion for State, Local Governments (9:44 p.m.)

House Democrats are backing Biden’s proposal for $350 billion in funding for state and local governments, according to draft stimulus legislation released Tuesday night.

House Oversight and Reform Committee Chair Carolyn Maloney’s bill, slated for committee action on Friday, sets up a new dedicated state and local fund in order to bypass the traditional appropriations process which is not eligible for budget reconciliation.

States would receive $195 billion and that money would partly be distributed based on a the share of unemployed workers. The District of Columbia would get the same share as states, unlike in last year’s relief bill. Local governments would receive $130 billion, partly based on population, with a carve-out for smaller communities. Territories would receive $4.5 billion and tribes $20 billion.

The bill also would spend $570 million to pay for 600 hours of paid leave for federal and postal workers to use for Covid quarantine or to care for infected loved ones.

“Democrats’ plan to bail out locked-down, poorly managed liberal states is unfair to American taxpayers and is ripe for waste, fraud, and abuse,” said the committee’s top Republican James Comer of Kentucky. — Erik Wasson

Farm Aid Included in Aid Plan, Through Commodity Purchases (6:54 p.m.)

Food aid for hungry Americans and commodity purchases for hurting agriculture producers topped the list of priorities within the fiscal 2021 budget reconciliation bill released by House Agriculture Committee Democrats.

The proposal would allot about $4 billion for the agriculture secretary to purchase commodities, such as fresh produce and dairy, and aid the food supply chain. There’s also more than $1 billion for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly referred to as food stamps. The House Agriculture Committee will consider the proposal Wednesday.

The initiative would also set aside $1 billion for the agriculture secretary to provide outreach and technical assistance to farmers and ranchers from socially disadvantaged groups, along with grants and loans to improve land access for them. — Megan Boyanton

Biden Backs Quicker Phase-Out of Aid Checks (4:05 p.m.)

Biden said Tuesday he would support a plan from House Democrats that provides $1,400 stimulus checks to Americans earning $75,000 or under but then more quickly scales down the payments to those earning above that amount.

Biden said he could back the proposal, released Monday, during an Oval Office meeting with business leaders to gain support for his proposed $1.9 trillion stimulus plan.

A group of 10 Republican senators who met last week with Biden had advocated for $1,000 payments phased out at $50,000 in individual income. Senator Joe Manchin, a West Virginia Democrat, had advocated for starting to phase out payments at $50,000 for individuals and $100,000 for couples.

House Democrats rejected those ideas, but did lower the amounts paid out to individuals who made between $75,000 and $100,000 and married couples making between $150,000 and $200,000. Taxpayers earning above those limits wouldn’t qualify for stimulus payments. — Justin Sink

Related: Here’s How Democrats Will Cap Relief Checks at $200,000 Income

Wyden Wants Changes to House Unemployment Draft (12:04 p.m.)

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden said Tuesday he will fight to ensure that enhanced unemployment benefits are more generous than in the draft of those sections released by the House Ways and Means Committee on Monday.

The House bill extends unemployment for gig workers, the long term unemployed as well as a weekly supplement of $400 through Aug. 29, just five months.

“I am going to fight like hell to get six,” said Wyden, noting that is what Biden originally proposed.

Extending unemployment insurance through the end of September would align the benefits expiration with the Oct. 1 deadline to pass a new funding bill to keep the government open. The move could make it easier for lawmakers to tack on another extension of jobless benefits without a lapse.

Wyden also wants a $600 per week federal supplemental UI payment. “Nobody on UI is using it to buy fancy imported products from Europe. They buy local,” he said.

Asked if the Finance Committee will hold a formal public vote on its own version of the bill, Wyden said the plan is still being worked out. He vowed to complete the bill by early March.

The Senate on Tuesday is beginning Trump’s impeachment trial and senators will be forced to sit as jurors every afternoon until the trial is completed. — Erik Wasson

Restaurants, Small Businesses Get Fresh Relief in Draft Package (11:32 a.m.)

House Democrats have alloted $7.5 billion in additional funding for the Paycheck Program Program of forgivable loans for small businesses. The House Small Business Committee released its draft language for its elements of President Biden’s Covid-19 relief plan, one of a dozen panels working on the bill. The PPP only just reopened last month, thanks to fresh funding approved in the December aid bill. The House Small Business Committee will vote on the text Wednesday.

The new proposal creates a $25 billion program for restaurants and other food and drinking establishments. A fifth of the funding will be set aside for the smallest firms — those with 2019 revenue of less than $500,000. The grants, available in amounts as large as $10 million per entity, may be used for expenses including payroll, mortgage, rent and utilities. The new initiative would be welcome news in the hospitality industry, which has been among the hardest hit during the pandemic crisis. — Cécile Daurat

— With assistance by Erik Wasson, Cecile Daurat, Justin Sink, Megan Boyanton, and Jon Herskovitz

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-02-09/restaurants-get-25-billion-in-draft-package-stimulus-update

 
 

 
 

Posted on

Some Illinois Medicaid patients in Chicago have limited pharmacy access

MM Curator summary

 
 

The Aetna decision to block CVS competitor Walgreens from Medicaid payments has left members with less options for filling prescriptions near their home.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

CHICAGO (WLS) — A recent change to the Illinois Medicaid prescription plan is making it difficult for many to get medications, especially on Chicago’s South and West sides.

It is a potential dilemma for millions in Illinois. Two months ago, Medicaid clients were told they could no longer use Walgreens unless they wanted to pay full price for their prescriptions.

 


New legislation is calling for Medicaid recipients to be able to use any pharmacy.
But in the meantime, some patients are struggling to access what could be life-saving drugs.

Aetna provides coverage for Illinois Medicaid patients. In December, Aetna changed the prescription plan, dropping Walgreens as a provider. Walgreens makes up 30% of all Chicago’s drugstores. Because Aetna is owned by CVS, Medicaid patients now have to get their medications at CVS and other in-network pharmacies.


“These patients already have a restricted network of pharmacies where they can get their medications, and we’re already in a pharmacy desert, and unfortunately this is being restricted even more,” said Dr. Thomas Huggett, Lawndale Christian Health Center.


There are more than 11,000 Medicaid patients who live on the West Side of Chicago, according to health equity experts. Most West Side neighborhoods do not have a CVS.


“We really need a corporation like CVS/Aetna to really look at its own practices and policies or we’re never going to get to an equitable society,” said Dr. David Ansell, Rush University Medical Center.


State Representative La Shawn Ford sponsored a bill that would allow Medicaid patients access to the pharmacy of their choice, discussing it at news conference on Thursday.

 

“We have to pass legislation, put pressure on HFS and Aetna to reverse that administrative rule, but right now Aetna and CVS believe that they’re right. They believe that there are enough pharmacies in the boundaries of their clients, and they don’t see a problem with their new rule,” said State Representative Ford.

In a statement to the I-Team, Aetna said:


Aetna Better Health of Illinois is committed to helping Medicaid recipients obtain access to affordable prescription drugs when they need them. Criticism about the access to pharmacy services we provide in our Medicaid network are not accurate and seem to be based on incomplete information.


Across Illinois, nearly 2,000 pharmacies participate in our Medicaid network. In Chicago, our members live – on average – just six blocks or a half-mile from one of 271 in-network Chicago pharmacies, including CVS Pharmacy, Jewel-Osco, HY-VEE, Kroger/Mariano’s, Meijer, Walmart, Target, and importantly – many independently-owned community drugstores. None of the pharmacy chains in our network is designated a preferred pharmacy, and the fact is that many of our members choose to support locally-owned independent pharmacies in their neighborhood. Support of these small businesses is an important long-term solution to addressing pharmacy deserts and stimulating local economies.


We regularly review our network and geographic access points to ensure we are meeting the needs of our members and maintaining network adequacy. We continue to meet or exceed all of the state’s access requirements for managed care organizations. Our strategy to address greater access for members living near pharmacy deserts includes free delivery from many chain and independent pharmacies and 90-day prescriptions shipped directly to members’ homes. We continue to invest in partnerships to drive innovation and community-based solutions to address this issue.

 
 

Clipped from: https://abc7chicago.com/illinois-medicaid-pharmacy-plan-walgreens/10315664/

00:00

 
 

 
 

 
 

Posted on

Sweeney, Greenstein Initiative to Improve Medicaid Prescription Drug Services Wins Committee Approval

 
 

MM Curator summary

 
 

NJ is looking to contract with a third party entity to address risks of polypharmacy.

 
 

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.


 

Trenton– Legislation sponsored by Senate President Steve Sweeney and Senator Linda Greenstein designed to improve the quality of care in the Medicaid program by identifying multi-drug medication risk and reducing adverse drug effects was passed by the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee today.

 
 

The bill, S-887, would push the state to initiate reforms that improve prescription safety and quality by requiring the Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services in the Department of Human Services to contract with a third-party entity to apply a risk reduction model to prescription drug services under the Medicaid program.

 

“We need to ensure that Medicaid funds are used appropriately and efficiently, and that the pharmaceutical services we provide are appropriate and safe,” said Senator Sweeney (D-Gloucester/Salem/Cumberland). “Putting in the proper controls will save lives and avert unnecessary hospital and doctor visits caused by adverse drug events.”

 

“People today are on multiple medications. We must do everything we can to ensure that prescribers and patients understand how these medications work together in the safest and most effective way,” said Senator Greenstein (D-Middlesex/Mercer). “By implementing various strategies that have proven successful in other markets, we can reduce the risk of adverse drug events for those in the Medicaid program.”

  

Nationwide, adverse drug events cause health problems that contribute to more than 3.5 million physician office visits, 1.3 million emergency room visits and 350,000 hospitalizations, cause extended lengths of stay and are the leading preventable cause of hospital readmissions, Dr. Calvin Knowlton, CEO of Tabula Rasa HealthCare, testified before the Senate Health Committee last September.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.insidernj.com/press-release/sweeney-greenstein-initiative-improve-medicaid-prescription-drug-services-wins-committee-approval/

 
 

 
 

 
 

Posted on

Ohio names one pharmacy benefit manager for Medicaid to save cash

MM Curator summary

Gainwell will become the new PBM in Ohio, beating out 5 other bidders including Express Scripts and Magellan.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

Ohio’s grand quest to finally slay the dragon of overcharges by pharmacy benefit managers starts Monday with the rollout of a new $158 million contract by the state Medicaid agency.

The Buckeye State’s premise, a unique approach just approved by the federal government: It takes a PBM to beat a PBM.

Bearing the sword on behalf of the state is Gainwell Technologies, a single PBM newly hired to work on behalf of Ohio taxpayers. The company will replace the multibillion-dollar conglomerates such as CVS Caremark and Express Scripts that currently serve as middlemen in the prescription drug supply chain for 3 million poor or disabled Ohioans.

At last count, those privately run PBMs were making off with nearly a quarter billion dollars a year, charging up to six times the going industrial rate, a state consultant found.

Ohio Medicaid Director Maureen Corcoran said the switch to a single, state-controlled PBM alone will save roughly $150 million to $200 million per year. However, the new arrangement also would cost the state revenue, such as about $23 million from a tax on health insuring corporations that no longer could be collected. And additional staff must be hired to handle duties the agency is taking over from managed-care organizations.

The bottom line will be revealed when Gov. Mike DeWine unveils his budget on Feb. 1, she said.

How PBMs make money often has been called a “black box” because even outside experts cannot figure it out. The new setup is designed to “break open the black box and be better accountable for tax dollars,” Corcoran said.

Medicaid, funded jointly by the state and federal governments, covers about $3.5 billion worth of prescription drugs a year in Ohio. (It is separate from Medicare, a federal program that pays for health care of those 65 and older.) 

“We will have a very-good-quality, experienced manager of these medications that will save the state money and will allow transparency about the care and the expenditures for this program that did not exist in the past,” Corcoran said.

Big changes for children, recipients on the way

Hiring Gainwell as Medicaid’s single PBM is one part of a huge restructuring of the state’s biggest agency that won’t be completed for another year. Still to come is the hiring of a pharmacy operational support vendor, designed to monitor the performance of Gainwell.

Also on the agenda is the OhioRise plan to cover specialized behavioral services for children with complex health needs. Those crushing expenses often aren’t covered by parents’ insurance, causing many to make the heart-breaking decision to voluntarily give up custody to the government so their children can be treated outside of Ohio. Thousands of other children are forced to live in group settings to get the care they need.

Starting in 2022, a federal waiver will allow the state to set up a specialized managed care organization with expertise in providing services for the most complex “multi-system” youth. Corcoran said the goal is to serve 50,000 children by the end of next year.

“We don’t have to take away custody; we can keep them in their family,” she said.

And likely the biggest state contract in history is set to be awarded later this month to winners of an 11-way competition to handle Medicaid’s managed care operations starting next year. The current contract, shared by six outfits, totals about $20 billion.

When what Corcoran calls a “new generation of Medicaid” is finally put in place, both Medicaid recipients and health-care providers will notice the difference.

One simple change will occur when a person on Medicaid changes managed-care plans. Now, they must make sure that their preferred Pharmacy A is on the new plan, or whether they must change to Pharmacy B. But with the state using a new centralized credentialing setup to decide which pharmacies and which drugs are covered, there will be no difference when making the switch.

On the other end of the drug-supply chain, doctors and pharmacists — which currently must fill out as many as seven similar forms to make sure they can get Medicaid reimbursement, a process that can take months — will need to complete only one standardized state form.

Big PBM, lobbyist’s favorite lose out

The competition for the single PBM contract started out with six companies. But three — including Express Scripts, the second-biggest in the country — were eliminated along the way.

One of the final three considered was MagellanRx Management, which was represented by longtime lobbyist Neil Clark when then-House Speaker Larry Householder inserted the single PBM plan into the state budget in mid-2019. Both Clark and Householder are now under federal indictment for a what authorities say was a $60 million scheme culminating about the same time to build the Perry County Republican’s political power and pass a $1 billion bailout of Ohio’s two nuclear power plants via House Bill 6.

Corcoran noted that Householder’s original budget language was revised before the bill was passed, and that Gov. DeWine vetoed several specific mandates about the procurement process.

Deputy Medicaid Director Steven Voigt said the competition “was very fair, diligent, with plenty of safeguards. Every bidder had the same chance.”

Gainwell wound up with the highest score from the panel that evaluated the proposals, and the company also offered the lowest price.

Gainwell or its predecessor has received 16 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services certifications since 2010 — more than all other vendors within the same period, the Ohio Medicaid department said. It provides pharmacy services for 29 state Medicaid programs, and implemented 21 Medicaid system modules in eight states.

“They are not like CVS or Express Scripts or whatever; they are more of an entity that has specialized in IT, clinical support, not like traditional PBMs focus on drug market,” Corcoran said.

“They have all of the skills and tools and requirements that are needed. The combination of their pharmacy, various types of pharmacy experiences across 29 (states), means they have demonstrated boots on the ground experience in every element of this PBM design that we have selected.”

Gainwell would be paid $158.2 million if it remains for the entire 7.5 years of the state contract. The pact, which must be approved by the bipartisan state Controlling board, includes financial penalties and an “out” for the state if the new single PBM does not measure up to state standards, Corcoran said.

Gainwell, which says it has more than 7,500 employees, was created on Oct. 1 by the $5 billion sale of DXC Technology’s U.S. state and local health and human services business to Veritas Capital, a leading investor in Gainwell.

“As a construct of the words ‘gain’ and ‘well,’ the name reflects the company’s mission to empower its clients through technology in order to deliver health and human services programs that enable successful health outcomes for beneficiaries nationwide,” Veritas said in a Sept. 16 press release.

Clipped from: https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/healthcare/2021/01/11/pharmacy-benefit-managers-ohio-medicaid-saving-pbm/6556793002/

 
 

 
 

Posted on

California proposes expanding Medicaid coverage of continuous glucose monitors

MM Curator summary

California wants to add $12M in the next fiscal year’s budget to pay for CGM for adults with Type 1 diabetes.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

Dive Brief:

  • California Gov. Gavin Newsom proposed providing $12 million to expand coverage of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs).
  • The 2021-22 budget proposal is intended to increase access to CGMs among adults with Type 1 diabetes who are covered by California’s Medicaid program Medi-Cal. Abbott, Dexcom, Medtronic and Senseonics compete for the U.S. CGM market.
  • Trade group AdvaMed welcomed the proposal, arguing it will reduce overall healthcare costs, and called on other states to take similar steps to ensure access to CGMs.

Dive Insight:

Sales of CGMs such as Abbott’s FreeStyle Libre and the Dexcom G6 have grown quickly in recent years as Type 1 and Type 2 diabetics have identified the devices as ways to improve the management of their conditions. However, Medicaid coverage of CGMs is patchy with some states providing no coverage and others limiting access to the pediatric population.

California was one of the states with a Medicaid program that only provided CGMs to children who met certain criteria. Lawmakers sought to expand access in 2019, only for Newsom to veto the bill. Newsom said expanded access should be considered through the annual budget process.  

State lawmakers reminded the Democratic governor of his comments about the budget process late last year, adding that the COVID-19 pandemic has emphasized the need for improved access to CGMs. The lawmakers framed CGMs as a way to control spending on adult diabetes patients. 

The pressure has paid off. Newsom wants to include $12 million in funding to enable adults with Type 1 diabetes to access CGMs in California. The funding, which is set to kick in at the start of next year, is the start of an ongoing commitment to CGMs. Newsom’s office sees CGM funding as a way to boost health equity. Overall Medi-Cal funding is set to increase more than 10% in 2021-22.

The budget proposal comes shortly after an American Diabetes Association survey found 20% of people have foregone or delayed getting a CGM or other device due to financial constraints during the COVID-19 pandemic. Among people with a CGM or insulin pump, 15% have delayed sourcing consumable supplies for the devices, typically due to financial constraints.

AdvaMed praised the funding proposal, stating Newsom “is exactly right to push for expansion of Medi-Cal’s coverage of CGMs.” The trade group said providing the Medi-Cal population with CGMs is both the right thing to do and “a smart way” to reduce healthcare costs.

The California legislature will determine whether the budget request is enacted, and the proposal will take effect Jan. 1, 2022, if approved. 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.medtechdive.com/news/california-proposes-expanding-medicaid-coverage-to-CGMs/593127/

 
 

Posted on

CMS finalizes rule for greater pricing flexibility for Medicaid drug purchases

MM Curator summary:

CMS has begun the process to define value based purchasing arrangements for drugs in the Medicaid program, with a focus on the value delivered by a drug to the individual patient. One key change to regs is to allow manufacturers the ability to report multiple best prices.

 
 

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.benefitspro.com/2020/12/23/cms-finalizes-rule-for-greater-pricing-flexibility-for-medicaid-drug-purchases/

New value-based pricing approaches could save up to $228 million in federal and state dollars through 2025.

 
 

 
 

The final rule codifies a broad definition of VBP, which can better align pricing and payment to observed or expected evidence and/or outcomes-based measures in a targeted population. (Image: Shutterstock)

States, private payers and manufacturers now have more flexibility to enter into value-based purchasing (VBP) arrangements for prescription drugs under Medicaid. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on Monday finalized regulatory changes to modernize Medicaid prescription drug purchasing and drive payment innovation.

Rules on prescription drug rebates and related reporting requirements have not been updated in thirty years and are thwarting innovative payment models in the private sector,” CMS Administrator Seema Verma said. “Medicaid’s outdated rules have consistently stymied the ability of payers and manufacturers to negotiate drug reimbursement methods based on the actual outcome of the treatment. A new generation of approaches to payment methods is needed to allow the market the room to adapt to these types of curative treatments while ensuring that public programs like Medicaid remain sustainable and continue to receive their statutorily required discounts.”

Related: Drug pricing legislation and the impact on self-insurers’ pharmacy spend

Under current regulations, prescription drug manufacturers face challenges accounting for VBP arrangements in their Medicaid best price reporting to CMS. This has the unintended consequence of hindering providers, insurers and prescription drug manufacturers in their efforts to develop innovative payment models for new drug therapies and other innovative treatments. Current regulations also discourage payers and manufacturers from designing new payment arrangements based on the value their product may provide.

With the new flexibilities under this final rule, manufacturers are expected to be more willing to negotiate with payers, including Medicaid, with
drug pricing being driven by the value of their drug to the individual patient.
New genetic-based treatments initially may be expensive but in the long run offer significant value to the patient and payer.

Payers will be able to negotiate prices with manufacturers for these genetic-based treatments based upon outcomes and evidence-based measures such as reduced hospitalizations, lab visits and physician office visits, ensuring that if such measures fail to support the value of a drug, the payer is not held accountable for the full price.

The final rule codifies a broad definition of VBP, which can better align pricing and payment to observed or expected evidence and/or outcomes-based measures in a targeted population. The final rule also allows manufacturers to report multiple best prices instead of a single best price when offering their VBP arrangements to all states. By making these changes, effective in January 2022, CMS hopes to encourage VBP arrangements and negotiations to help make new, innovative therapies more available to all patients. As a result, it is estimated that these new

VBP approaches could save up to $228 million in federal and state dollars through 2025. Basing payment on the effectiveness of a given therapy can foster innovation in the treatments that are most beneficial to patients, while reducing overall health-care spending and hospital visits. When payers are positioned to be stronger negotiators with drug manufacturers, Medicaid beneficiaries will benefit from better access to prescription medications.

 
 

 
 

 
 

Posted on

1199SEIU pushing to repeal medicaid drug carve-out

MM Curator summary

 
 

Provider groups that can currently use the 340B program to redirect millions of surplus dollars are upset that this opportunity is being removed from them and given back to the state of NY itself.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.news10.com/community/honoring-healthcare-heros/1199seiu-pushing-to-repeal-medicaid-drug-carve-out/

Pharmaceuticals in North Andover, Massachusetts on June 15, 2018. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola, file)

ALBANY, N.Y. (NEWS10) — The largest health care union in the country is joining the call to repeal “the disastrous Medicaid drug carve-out.”

Currently, the 340B program lets community programs buy medication at a deep discount while passing savings in the form of housing aid and food assistance to residents. New York plans to carve-out this Medicaid prescription drug program on April 1.

Dozens of community health groups—Save NY’s Safety Net coalition—want the Department of Health to reverse the changes to the 340B drug discount program. 1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East (1199SEIU) has signed onto the coalition, which says the carve out changes will impact vaccine distribution and decimate service for thousands of vulnerable, underserved, and low-income New Yorkers who have been impacted the most by the pandemic.

“Each year, Callen Lorde reaches thousands of patients who would otherwise have nowhere to receive care. I believe with all my heart we improve the health and lives of our patients who receive essential services including housing and behavioral health. All of this is at risk if we lose the income we receive from the 340b program,” said Danielle Pickering, an R.N. at Callen Lorde Community Health Center and member of the New York-based union.

The coalition says hospital facilities and health care support groups statewide have written to the Department of Health to protest the change. They also point to a report—“Why New York Should Maintain its Medicaid Pharmacy Carve-In Approach“—indicating that the change would cost over $1 billion over the next five years. Community health groups also warn that changes to the 340B drug discount program will make it harder to educate people about the vaccine and vaccinate New Yorkers from minority communities.

Vaccine hesitation continues in underserved communities

“The programs 340B helps fund are the same programs that have helped community health centers forge relationships with communities that are justifiably skeptical of the COVID vaccine. The State should be relying on those relationships to build vaccine confidence in black and brown communities, not undermining them,” said Rose Duhan, CHCANYS president and CEO.

Duhan says changing the program would destroy those relationships and cost insurers hundreds of millions, all without amounting to savings for taxpayers. “We are begging the state: abandon this ill-conceived plan,” she says.

Coalition members include:

  • African Services Committee
  • AIDS Healthcare Foundation
  • Albany Damien Center
  • Alliance for Positive Change
  • Bridging Access to Care
  • Callen-Lorde Community Health Center
  • Community Health Care Association of New York State (CHCANYS)
  • Coalition of Medication-Assisted Treatment Providers and Advocates (COMPA)
  • Communities Advocating Emergency AIDS Relief Coalition
  • Community Health Initiatives
  • Community Healthcare Network
  • Damian Family Care Centers
  • Drug Policy Alliance
  • EngageWell IPA
  • Evergreen Health Services
  • Finger Lakes Community Health
  • Gay Men’s Health Crisis (GMHC)
  • Harlem United
  • Hispanic Health Network
  • Housing Works
  • iHealth
  • Latino Commission on AIDS
  • Legal Action Center
  • New York Immigration Coalition
  • New York #Insulin4All
  • NYS Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare
  • Planned Parenthood Empire State Acts
  • Primary Care Development Corporation (PCDC)
  • RWC-340B
  • Ryan Health
  • Sun River Health
  • The Alcoholism & Substance Abuse Providers of New York State
  • The Institute for Family Health
  • The LGBT Community Center
  • The Mental Health Association in New York State
  • The National Working Positive Coalition
  • Therapeutic Communities Association of New York (TCANY)
  • TOUCH
  • Treatment Action Group
  • Trillium Health
  • VIP Community Services

 
 

 
 

Posted on

Florida finds PBMs are benefiting from a lucrative profit center

Clipped from: https://www.statnews.com/pharmalot/2020/12/09/florida-pbm-pharmacy-medicaid/

 

As states struggle to control the cost of prescription medicines, a new report found pharmacy benefit managers pocketed more than $89 million collected on behalf of the Florida Medicaid program — and the consultants who ran the analysis recommended state officials rework the arrangements.

The report found that PBMs appear to have profited from what is known as spread pricing, which refers to the dispensing fees that these companies pay pharmacies but then bill at a different rate to state Medicaid programs. In this instance, the PBMs working with managed care plans made $8.64 for each Medicaid prescription, which accounted for 9.5% of total plan spending.

Posted on

Magellan Rx Management Releases Fifth Annual Medicaid Pharmacy Trend Report

Curator, Rx, Roundtable show

 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

Curator summary

Roughly half of Medicaid spending is on specialty drugs based on this 25-state study.

Clipped from: https://news.yahoo.com/magellan-rx-management-releases-fifth-113000880.html

Magellan Rx Management, the full-service pharmacy benefits management division of Magellan Health, Inc. (NASDAQ: MGLN), released its fifth annual Medicaid Pharmacy Trend ReportTM, the industry’s leading report exclusively detailing trends in the Medicaid pharmacy fee-for-service (FFS) space and the only detailed source examining Medicaid FFS gross and net drug spend trends.

“As a national leader in pharmacy benefit management, with more than 40 years of experience, we maintain a deep understanding of the complexities within the Medicaid space related to prescription drug costs and utilization trends,” said Meredith Delk, PhD, MSW, general manager and senior vice president, government markets, Magellan Rx Management. “The Medicaid Trend Report is one tool of many we deploy that provides value to our more than 25 government customers and Medicaid agencies across the country. We are delighted to release it for the fifth consecutive year.”

Developed through in-depth data analysis and supported by Magellan’s broad national experience managing Medicaid FFS pharmacy, the Medicaid Pharmacy Trend Report highlights the evolving landscape of Medicaid prescription drugs and anticipates the trends and challenges in the Medicaid FFS space. The report also now includes a standard in-depth analysis of the top drug classes including six additional categories that provide a superior overview of classes with significant net dollar impact.

 

Key findings in this year’s report include:

  • In 2019, specialty drugs accounted for 48.5 percent of net cost in Medicaid while making up just 1.3 percent of utilization.
  • Traditional net spending on drugs decreased 0.4 percent from 2018 to 2019.
  • Unit cost, not utilization, drove specialty trend in 2019. The net cost per claim increased by $141.12, while utilization decreased by 0.9 percent.
  • While claim volume remains virtually unchanged, the total net spend on specialty drugs increased by 2.4 percent which indicates that specialty drugs will account for 50 percent of total net spend for 2020.

“States are faced with inherent challenges related to the variability in the Medicaid program due to fluctuations in enrollment, enabling legislation and pharmacy program design,” said Chris Andrews, Pharm.D., vice president, value-based purchasing, Magellan Rx Management. “The Medicaid Trend Report clearly illustrates critical data-driven observations and helpful solutions that can assist states as they continue to explore and implement efforts to balance the growing cost of state Medicaid programs with state budget projections as they focus on achieving improved outcomes for Medicaid patients.”

The Magellan Rx Management Medicaid Pharmacy Trend Report includes data derived from Magellan Rx’s Medicaid FFS pharmacy programs in 25 states and the District of Columbia.

About Magellan Rx Management: Magellan Rx Management, a division of Magellan Health, Inc., is shaping the future of pharmacy. As a next-generation pharmacy organization, we deliver meaningful solutions to the people we serve. As pioneers in specialty drug management, industry leaders in Medicaid pharmacy programs and disruptors in pharmacy benefit management, we partner with our customers and members to deliver a best-in-class healthcare experience.

About Magellan Health: Magellan Health, Inc., a Fortune 500 company, is a leader in managing the fastest growing, most complex areas of health, including special populations, complete pharmacy benefits and other specialty areas of healthcare. Magellan supports innovative ways of accessing better health through technology, while remaining focused on the critical personal relationships that are necessary to achieve a healthy, vibrant life. Magellan’s customers include health plans and other managed care organizations, employers, labor unions, various military and governmental agencies and third-party administrators. For more information, visit MagellanHealth.com.

(MGLN-GEN)

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20201113005178/en/

Contacts

Media Contact: Lilly Ackley, ackleyl@magellanhealth.com, (860) 507-1923

Investor Contact: Darren Lehrich, lehrichd@magellanhealth.com, (860) 507-1814