Posted on

FWA (VA)- Chester woman sentenced by DOJ for Medicaid, healthcare fraud

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Sharon Johnson operated a fraudulent group home, stole resident pension funds and billed for deceased residents for 8 months before reporting them dead. You paid for every penny of this with your W-2s.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.wric.com/news/local-news/chesterfield-county/chester-woman-sentenced-for-medicaid-healthcare-fraud/

 
 

A photo of a Medicaid form. (Photo: MGN)

CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, Va. — A Chester woman was sentenced on Thursday, July 7 for several charges relating to healthcare fraud.

58-year-old Sharon Johnson has been sentenced to 51 months in prison for the conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud, healthcare fraud and wire fraud, according to the the U.S. Department of Justice .

These charges center around Johnson’s owning and operating of an unlicensed group home under “Sharon Y. Johnson & Associates” (SYJA) for seven years.

This organization claimed to provide personal and home healthcare services, allowing those on Medicaid to remain in-home rather than enter a nursing or group home. All of these services were paid for by the individuals’ Medicaid eligibility.

The unlicensed facility was located within her own home in Chester — a three bedroom home that the DOJ reports regularly housed up to a half-dozen residents.

According to the DOJ, Johnson would bill Medicaid for services she did not provide her patients. She would also submit documents to the Virginia Retirement System (VRS) to allow her access to their pensions.

PREVIOUS: Chester woman received Medicaid, pension payments from unlicensed group home patients in fraud scheme

Furthermore, the DOJ reports that Johnson fraudulently collected a now-deceased patient’s VRS pension payments for at least 8 months after her death before she eventually reported the death. She did this by obtaining “Medical Power of Attorney” over the resident.

Johnson pleaded guilty to these charges in December 2022, and was originally meant to be sentenced in April of this year.

More information on this case can be found on wric.com the Department of Justice’s website.

Posted on

FWA (VA)- Health Connect America Gets Fined $4.6M for Wrongful Billing of Medicaid

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Health Connect stole $4.6M from your W-2. They did not say thank you. But they do promise to do better. Pinky swear, even. (bogus mental health services claims in multiple states)

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://medcitynews.com/2023/07/mental-health-children-fined-medicaid-improper-billing/

Health Connect America, a mental health company, improperly billed Virginia Medicaid for three different behavioral health services for children, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office of Western District of Virginia.

 
 

Mental health company Health Connect America will pay more than $4.6 million “to resolve allegations that it billed Virginia Medicaid for services not provided,” the U.S. Attorney’s Office of Western District of Virginia announced Friday.

Franklin, Tennessee-based Health Connect America
offers mental and behavioral health services to youth, individuals and families. It supports patients battling grief, anger management, family issues and substance use disorder. Health Connect America currently serves patients in Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Tennessee and Virginia.

Health Connect America allegedly improperly billed Medicaid for three different behavioral health services for children, according to the Attorney’s Office. The first is called Therapeutic Day Treatment, which is a school-based program for kids with a variety of mental health conditions. The mental health company billed Virginia Medicaid for services to students who were absent, as well as during holidays and weather closures.

Another program it improperly billed Virginia Medicaid for is called Intensive In-home Services, a home-based mental health program for children who are “at risk of being removed from their home,” according to the Attorney’s Office. However, Health Connect America allegedly billed Virginia Medicaid for services by an employee who was engaged in a sexual relationship with a minor in Orange County, Virginia. The employee is currently serving a 10-year sentence.

Lastly, the company wrongly billed Virginia Medicaid for Behavioral Therapy Services, a specialized mental health treatment for kids with conditions like autism. Behavioral Therapy Services are required to be provided by specially-trained mental health professionals. However, Health Connect America billed for Behavioral Health Services by providers who were not “properly trained or credentialed” in Southwest Virginia.

The company also “used the name and National Provider Identifier (NPI) number of a properly-trained and credentialed mental health professional located in Northern Virginia who had never seen clients in Southwest Virginia,” the Attorney’s Office said.

Promoted

 
 

PE Investments, Acquisitions Fuel New Stages of Growth for Healthcare and Life Science Companies


In an interview, Nathan Ray, a partner with the healthcare and life practice who oversees M&A/PE related work in that industry for West Monroe, highlighted how his firm works with companies to drive due diligence for clients, and help acquired companies address issues and differentiate during holds.

Stephanie Baum

“Health care providers have a responsibility to submit accurate and honest claims to federal health care programs to ensure that these resources are available for eligible patients,” said Maureen Dixon, special agent in charge at the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), in a news release. “HHS-OIG is committed to safeguarding valuable taxpayer dollars and protecting the integrity of the Medicaid program.”

Health Connect America has agreed to five years of additional oversight and compliance. Compliance measures include unannounced audits and additional reporting requirements if there are situations of theft, fraud, abuse or neglect.

Not complying could lead to “criminal prosecution and contempt of court proceedings that could result in additional monetary sanctions and injunctive relief,” the Attorney’s Office stated.

Health Connect America did not return a request for comment.

Photo credit: Waldemarus, Getty Images

Posted on

PHE (MCOs)- Molina, Elevance Health Medicaid membership grew by over 50% during continuous enrollment

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Follow the money. Then listen to the chicken littles, who don’t realize they are unwitting mouth pieces of the Titans.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.beckerspayer.com/payer/molina-elevance-health-medicaid-membership-grew-by-over-50-during-continuous-enrollment.html

Molina Healthcare had the largest gains in Medicaid enrollment during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a report from KFF published July 6. 

Elevance Health’s Medicaid membership also grew by over 50 percent during continuous coverage requirements, according to the report. 

More than 1 million people have been disenrolled from state Medicaid programs since April, when states were allowed to begin removing ineligible members for the first time since continuous coverage requirements were put in place in 2020. 

Among five major Medicaid managed care companies — Molina Healthcare, Elevance Health, Centene, UnitedHealthcare and CVS Health — Medicaid enrollment increased by 44.1 percent from 2020 to 2023. 

In investor calls, payer executives have said the companies are working to transition Medicaid members who lose coverage to ACA plans and other forms of coverage. 

Here’s how much five major payers’ Medicaid enrollment increased during the pandemic: 

  1. Molina Healthcare: 62.8 percent increase
  2. Elevance Health: 56.1 percent increase
  3. UnitedHealth: 42.5 percent increase 
  4. Centene: 38 percent increase
  5. CVS Health: 17.1 percent increase 

Subscribe to the following topics: molina healthcareelevance healthunitedhealthcentenecvs health

Posted on

TECH- Medicaid security breach affects over 2,600 Arizonans, agency says

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: “Passw0rd”

 
 

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.azfamily.com/2023/06/30/medicaid-security-breach-affects-over-2600-arizonans-agency-says/

 
 

The Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System says 2,632 people are affected by the breach.(MGN)

PHOENIX (3TV/CBS 5) — Over 2,600 Arizona Medicaid recipients may have had their personal information stolen after a breach that happened mid-May.

The state’s Medicaid agency, the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS), said in a statement that it is “aware of a breach of personal information on May 11, 2023 affecting 2,632 individuals in Arizona who are enrolled Medicaid members.” The vulnerability would have allowed bad actors to see sensitive details, including first and last names, addresses and the last four digits of Social Security numbers through the Health-e-Arizona Plus website. Upon learning of the error, the HEAplus system toolbar was turned off.

AHCCCS assures that this type of breach would not happen again, the agency said in the statement, and that starting July 3, it will start to notify those affected by the breach. The agency will send out the notifications through the mail.

If you learn that you’re affected by the breach, you can contact one of the three credit reporting agencies to report a fraud alert, which lets the agencies know that any new requests for credit may be fraudulent. You can also ask the agencies for a security freeze that stops agencies from releasing your information without your express permission (you’ll have to do this using certified mail notifying all three agencies).

Consumers are entitled to one free credit report from each of the three agencies: Equifax, Experian and TransUnion. You can learn more at www.annualcreditreport.com or call 1-877-322-8228.

Credit Reporting Agency contact information:

Equifax, 1-888-378-4329 or www.equifax.com/personal or mail to P.O. Box 740241, Atlanta, GA 30374-0241

Experian, 1-888-EXPERIAN (397-3742) or www.experian.com or mail to P.O. Box 9532, Allen, TX, 75013

TransUnion, 1-800-916-8800 or www.transunion.com/annual-credit-report or mail to Fraud Victim Assistance Division, P.O. Box 6790, Fullerton, CA 92834-6790

Other resources:

Report any suspected identity theft to local police and inform AHCCCS of any filed police reports.

Identity Theft Resource Center | www.idtheftcenter.org

1-888-400-5530 (not a toll-free number). Information is available in English and Spanish.

Federal Trade Commission |
www.consumer.ftc.gov/features

1-877-ID-THEFT (1-877-438-4338). Information is available in English and Spanish.

Arizona Attorney General’s Office

For more, www.azag.gov/consumer provides tips on how to guard against identity theft and the misuse of personal information (select Identity Theft from Quick Links menu at top of home page). You may also call 602-542-5025 (Phoenix); 520-628-6504 (Tucson); or toll-free 1-866-742-4911 (outside Maricopa and Pima Counties).

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Posted on

RX- Antipsychotic Medication Use In Medicaid-Insured Children Decreased Substantially Between 2008 And 2016

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Celebrating that now only 55% of Medicaid kids getting a powerful antipsychotic med are missing a relevant diagnosis to validate they need it or suggest are getting their care managed.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01625

Abstract

After the rapid growth of pediatric antipsychotic prescribing in the early 2000s, especially in the Medicaid population, concerns regarding the safety and appropriateness of such prescribing increased. Many states implemented policy and educational initiatives aimed at safer and more judicious antipsychotic use. Antipsychotic use leveled off in the late 2000s, but there have been no recent national estimates of trends in antipsychotic use in children enrolled in Medicaid, and it is unclear how use varied by race and ethnicity. This study observed a sizable decline in antipsychotic use among children ages 2–17 between 2008 and 2016. Although the magnitude of change varied, declines were observed across foster care status, age, sex, and racial and ethnic groups studied. The proportion of children with an antipsychotic prescription who received any diagnosis associated with a pediatric indication that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration increased from 38 percent in 2008 to 45 percent in 2016, which may indicate a trend toward more judicious prescribing.

TOPICS

 
 

  •  

 
 

  • 1 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicaid Integrity Group. Atypical antipsychotic medications: use in pediatric patients [Internet]. Baltimore (MD): CMS; 2015 Oct [cited 2023 Apr 27]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/medicare-medicaid-coordination/fraud-prevention/medicaid-integrity-education/pharmacy-education-materials/downloads/atyp-antipsych-pediatric-factsheet11-14.pdf
    Google Scholar

  • 2 Galling B, Roldán A, Nielsen RE, Nielsen J, Gerhard T, Carbon Met al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in youth exposed to antipsychotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73(3):247–59. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ray WA, Stein CM, Murray KT, Fuchs DC, Patrick SW, Daugherty Jet al. Association of antipsychotic treatment with risk of unexpected death among children and youths. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(2):162–71. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Libowitz MR, Nurmi EL. The burden of antipsychotic-induced weight gain and metabolic syndrome in children. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:623681. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jensen KG, Correll CU, Rudå D, Klauber DG, Decara MS, Fagerlund Bet al. Cardiometabolic adverse effects and its predictors in children and adolescents with first-episode psychosis during treatment with quetiapine-extended release versus aripiprazole: 12-week results from the Tolerance and Effect of Antipsychotics in Children and Adolescents with Psychosis (TEA) Trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019;58(11):1062–78. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Crystal S, Mackie T, Fenton MC, Amin S, Neese-Todd S, Olfson Met al. Rapid growth of antipsychotic prescriptions for children who are publicly insured has ceased, but concerns remain. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(6):974–82. Go to the articleGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Patten SB, Waheed W, Bresee L. A review of pharmacoepidemiologic studies of antipsychotic use in children and adolescents. Can J Psychiatry. 2012;57(12):717–21. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Crystal S, Olfson M, Huang C, Pincus H, Gerhard T. Broadened use of atypical antipsychotics: safety, effectiveness, and policy challenges. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(5):w770–81. Go to the articleGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Mackie TI, Hyde J, Palinkas LA, Niemi E, Leslie LK. Fostering psychotropic medication oversight for children in foster care: a national examination of states’ monitoring mechanisms. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017;44(2):243–57. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Spence O, Reeves G, dosReis S. Spillover effects of state Medicaid antipsychotic prior authorization policies in US commercially insured youth. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020;29(9):1064–71. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bushnell GA, Crystal S, Olfson M. Trends in antipsychotic medication use in young privately insured children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021;60(7):877–86. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Edelsohn GA, Karpov I, Parthasarathy M, Hutchison SL, Castelnovo K, Ghuman Jet al. Trends in antipsychotic prescribing in Medicaid-eligible youth. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56(1):59–66. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Nunes JC, Naccarato T, Stafford RS. Antipsychotics in the California foster care system: a 10-year analysis. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2022;32(7):400–7. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Cataife G, Weinberg DA. Racial and ethnic differences in antipsychotic medication use among children enrolled in Medicaid. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(9):946–51. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 To access the appendix, click on the Details tab of the article online.
  • 16 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. DQ Atlas [Internet]. Baltimore (MD): CMS; [cited 2023 Apr 27]. Available from: https://www.medicaid.gov/dq-atlas/welcome
    Google Scholar

  • 17 Nguyen JK, Sanghavi P. A national assessment of legacy versus new generation Medicaid data. Health Serv Res. 2022;57(4):944–56. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Schmid I, Burcu M, Zito JM. Medicaid prior authorization policies for pediatric use of antipsychotic medications. JAMA. 2015;313(9):966–8. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Zito JM, Burcu M, McKean S, Warnock R, Kelman J. Pediatric use of antipsychotic medications before and after Medicaid peer review implementation. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(1):100–3. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Foti ME, Harper G, Moon R, Oestreich G, Snow R, Thompson Jet al. Antipsychotic medication use in Medicaid children and adolescents: report and resource guide from a 16-state study [Internet]. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers Center for Education and Research on Mental Health Therapeutics; 2010 Jun [cited 2023 Apr 27]. Available from: https://ifh.rutgers.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/MMDLN-Rutgers-AP_MED_USE_IN_CHILDREN…en_Report_and_Resource_Guide_Final.pdf
    Google Scholar

  • 21 National Committee for Quality Assurance. HEDIS measures for the safe & judicious use of antipsychotic medications in children and adolescents [Internet]. Washington (DC): NCQA; [cited 2023 Apr 27]. Available from: https://www.ncqa.org/hedis/reports-and-research/national-collaborative-for-innovation-in-quality-measurement/hedis-measures-for-the-safe-judicious-use-of-antipsychotic-medications-in-children-and-adolescents/
    Google Scholar

  • 22 Department of Health and Human Services. 2015 annual report on the quality of care for children in Medicaid and CHIP [Internet]. Washington (DC): HHS; 2016 Feb [cited 2023 Jun 14]. Available from: https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/quality-of-care/downloads/2015-child-sec-rept.pdf
    Google Scholar

  • 23 Akincigil A, Mackie TI, Cook S, Hilt RJ, Crystal S. Effectiveness of mandatory peer review to reduce antipsychotic prescriptions for Medicaid-insured children. Health Serv Res. 2020;55(4):596–603. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mackie TI, Cook S, Crystal S, Olfson M, Akincigil A. Antipsychotic use among youth in foster care enrolled in a specialized managed care organization intervention. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020;59(1):166–176.e3. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Finnerty M, Neese-Todd S, Bilder S, Olfson M, Crystal S. Best practices: MEDNET: a multistate policy maker–researcher collaboration to improve prescribing practices. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(11):1297–9. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Findling RL, Drury SS, Jensen PS, Rapoport JL, Bukstein OG, Walter HJet al. Practice parameter for the use of atypical antipsychotic medications in children and adolescents [Internet]. Washington (DC): American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry; c 2011 [cited 2023 Apr 27]. Available from: https://www.aacap.org/App_Themes/AACAP/docs/practice_parameters/Atypical_Antipsychotic_Medications_Web.pdf
    Google Scholar

  • 27 Scotto Rosato N, Correll CU, Pappadopulos E, Chait A, Crystal S, Jensen PSet al. Treatment of maladaptive aggression in youth: CERT guidelines II. Treatments and ongoing management. Pediatrics. 2012;129(6):e1577–86. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Penfold RB, Thompson EE, Hilt RJ, Kelleher KJ, Schwartz N, Beck Aet al. Safer Use of Antipsychotics in Youth (SUAY) pragmatic trial protocol. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020;99:106184. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Stroup TS, Gerhard T, Crystal S, Huang C, Olfson M. Comparative effectiveness of clozapine and standard antipsychotic treatment in adults with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173(2):166–73. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Olfson M, Gerhard T, Huang C, Lieberman JA, Bobo WV, Crystal S. Comparative effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotic medications in early-onset schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38(4):845–53. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Psychosis and schizophrenia in children and young people: recognition and management [Internet]. London: NICE; 2013 Jan 23 [last updated 2016 Oct 26; cited 2023 Apr 27]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg155
    Google Scholar

  • 32 Morrison AP, Pyle M, Maughan D, Johns L, Freeman D, Broome MRet al. Antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (MAPS): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(9):788–800. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Cook BL, Carson NJ, Kafali EN, Valentine A, Rueda JD, Coe-Odess Set al. Examining psychotropic medication use among youth in the U.S. by race/ethnicity and psychological impairment. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2017;45:32–9. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Heun-Johnson H, Menchine M, Axeen S, Lung K, Claudius I, Wright Tet al. Association between race/ethnicity and disparities in health care use before first-episode psychosis among privately insured young patients. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(3):311–9. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, St George DM. Distrust, race, and research. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(21):2458–63. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36 DeLuca JS, Novacek DM, Adery LH, Herrera SN, Landa Y, Corcoran CMet al. Equity in mental health services for youth at clinical high risk for psychosis: considering marginalized identities and stressors. Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2022;7(2):176–97. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Vanderwerker L, Akincigil A, Olfson M, Gerhard T, Neese-Todd S, Crystal S. Foster care, externalizing disorders, and antipsychotic use among Medicaid-enrolled youths. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(10):1281–4. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Tan C, Greiner MV, Nause K, Shahabuddin Z, Beal SJ. Mental health diagnoses, health care utilization, and placement stability on antipsychotic prescribing among foster care youth. Acad Pediatr. 2023;23(3):675–80. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Dosreis S, Yoon Y, Rubin DM, Riddle MA, Noll E, Rothbard A. Antipsychotic treatment among youth in foster care. Pediatrics. 2011;128(6):e1459–66. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Leckman-Westin E, Finnerty M, Scholle SH, Pritam R, Layman D, Kealey Eet al. Differences in Medicaid antipsychotic medication measures among children with SSI, foster care, and income-based aid. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018;24(3):238–46. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Lohr WD, Jawad K, Feygin Y, Le J, Creel L, Pasquenza Net al. Antipsychotic medications for low-income preschoolers: long duration and psychotropic medication polypharmacy. Psychiatr Serv. 2022;73(5):510–7. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Olfson M, King M, Schoenbaum M. Treatment of young people with antipsychotic medications in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(9):867–74. Google Scholar
  • 43 Patel H, Barnes J, Osazuwa-Peters N, Bierut LJ. Association of state Medicaid expansion status with rates of suicide among US adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(6):e2217228. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Sommers BD, Blendon RJ, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. Changes in utilization and health among low-income adults after Medicaid expansion or expanded private insurance. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(10):1501–9. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
Posted on

MCOs (ID)- Idaho awards $1.2 billion contract for behavioral health. Both losing bidders sue

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Shocker.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://idahocapitalsun.com/2023/07/05/idaho-awards-1-2-billion-contract-for-behavioral-health-both-losing-bidders-sue/

New managed care organization to oversee mental health, substance abuse treatment for 425,000 Idahoans

 
 

The new contractor managing the Idaho Behavioral Health Plan won’t take over until March 2024. (Getty Images)

Idaho state agencies are facing two lawsuits after awarding a new, expanded $1.2 billion contract to manage behavioral health services statewide.

The contract, which could change care as soon as next March, controls how more than 425,000 Idahoans — about one in five residents of the state — access behavioral health care. The new organization selected, Magellan Health, will manage care for Idahoans on private health insurance or Medicaid, and those who are uninsured. The new contract includes inpatient care, like hospitalization for mental health issues, while the previous contract only included outpatient care, like visits to a therapist.

A managed care organization is a company that manages health benefits and care for patients.

Need to get in touch?

Have a news tip?

One Idaho analyst sees the new contract structure as promising because it makes one company accountable for the costs of a patient’s entire mental health care. But two companies who lost their bids for the contract argue that the process was flawed, alleging that the state made errors in evaluating proposals.

The state awarded the new contract to Magellan Health, which was recently acquired by Medicaid managed-care giant Centene Corporation. The parent company in February settled to pay California $215 million to settle a drug-pricing scandal, the Ohio Capital Journal reported.

In legal filings released Friday, Magellan argued that the companies suing — Beacon Health and Optum Health — do not have the legal standing to sue, requesting the cases be dismissed. The state, meanwhile, also requested the cases be dismissed, arguing that the court is not legally allowed to review procurement cases. 

Agency spokespeople for the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare and the Idaho Department of Purchasing told the Idaho Capital Sun that they cannot comment on pending litigation, which is a standard practice for Idaho state agencies. Spokespeople for Magellan Health and Centene could not be reached for comment.

Are you an Idaho patient or provider affected by this change?

Reach out to kpfann@idahocapitalsun.com.

What the Idaho lawsuits argue

The new contract has a drastically expanded scope. And the winning provider does not have minimum qualifications to be eligible for the contract, argues Optum Health, which has held a contract with the state to operate the Idaho Behavioral Health Plan for a decade.

In its lawsuit, Optum argues that Magellan failed to meet the contract’s requirement for a managed care organization to be accredited under the National Committee for Quality Assurance. Magellan says it could not become accredited until 2024, Optum claims.

Optum argues in its lawsuit that it earned an “excellent reputation by exceeding review standards, expanding provider access” and claims that it “saved Idaho taxpayers around $400 million compared to projected Medicaid spending.” Previous reporting by the Idaho Statesman found complaints that the company had violated some patients’ privacy.

To evaluate bids, the state scored and ranked each proposal. Magellan’s had the lowest initial cost, Lori Wolff, interim head of the Idaho Division of Purchasing, told the Idaho Capital Sun. But the initial cost estimates only included administrative costs, Wolff added, not benefit costs.

Optum did not make it to the final round, earning the lowest score on its proposal. Beacon and Magellan advanced to the negotiation stage, allowed under a contracting process the state used called invitation to negotiate, which lets someone requesting bids for projects to negotiate with finalists. 

Beacon was originally slated as the contract winner earlier, but it was disqualified after a judge found that the company’s work on a 2019 report on crisis health care needs was related to the contract bid.

Beacon, in its suit, argues that decision “is unsupported by any direct evidence that (the state health department) used Beacon’s prior work to prepare” the bid. 

Beacon, which got the highest technical score, also argues it was unaware that the request for a behavioral health managed care organization drew upon its previous report, which Beacon says was meant to help understand the national behavioral health crisis system, identify needs in Idaho and regionally and recommend ways to address them. The company argues the entire bidding process should be restarted.

Optum says in its lawsuit that it helped 67,739 Idahoans access specialty mental health services last year, including 13,325 who were treated for substance abuse.

The state’s process for obtaining bids on the contract was flawed, Optum attorneys argue, and they also argue that the state should void Magellan’s contract and award a contract to Optum.

“If immediate action is not taken, transition activities could begin that will be costly to the State and Idaho taxpayers,” Optum argues in its suit.

The state applied certain weights to information companies submitted in their bids without disclosing those weights beforehand, Optum says. And after the state chose Beacon and Magellan, not Optum as finalists, it negotiated, which Optum claims is illegal.

“[Errors] deprived Optum of a full and fair opportunity to compete for a public contract,” Optum argues in its lawsuit. “Optum will suffer great and irreparable injury as a result, including this lost opportunity to provide critical services in Idaho and serve the State’s most vulnerable population.”

In addition to arguing that both other companies are ineligible for the contract, Optum argues that only its bid “should have been permitted to advance.” Optum was not considered a finalist for the contract, scoring the lowest on its technical proposal and second on cost proposal.

“We have developed trusted relationships across the state, and Optum Idaho remains committed to providing high quality services to the people we serve,” said Chris Smith, director of strategic communications in Idaho for Optum. “We have significant concerns with the highly irregular and fundamentally flawed procurement process and its effect on those who rely on these vital behavioral health services.”

Improved contract structure for behavioral health in Idaho

The Idaho Behavioral Health Plan provides a framework for how to provide mental health and substance use treatment across the state. The plan has for a decade contracted with Optum Health, one of the organizations that lost the bid and is suing.

The new contract’s structure makes a promising improvement though, said Ryan Langrill, analyst for the Idaho Office of Performance Evaluations. Previously, Idaho’s contract for a managed care provider only included outpatient behavioral health services, putting those who are hospitalized for behavioral health issues under the care of the state.

Langrill said that excluding inpatient care from the contract created an incentive for an organization to not offer the best, and sometimes costliest outpatient care to patients, since allowing them to be admitted as inpatients would relieve the organization of responsibility.

Put another way: Having one provider manage inpatient and outpatient behavioral care meant that that organization had an incentive to make sure the person got the care they needed, instead of shifting them to inpatient, where the state foots the bill and risk.

“Everything we’ve seen, all the research we did about how managed care is supposed to work, was that you want to bundle substitute services together because of the big risks with managed care is the way the state pays managed care organizations on a per member, per month rate,” Langrill said. “And if the managed care organization can deliver services at less (cost), then they get to keep some of the money.”

The state has administered inpatient behavioral health care through its Division of Behavioral Services. But under the new contract, that division will no longer administer inpatient care, according to a new webpage.

Langrill said he didn’t have any proof that Optum was doing that, but a 2016 report by OPE highlighted this gap, recommending the Department of Health and Welfare formally evaluate including inpatient services with its behavioral care managed care contract.

“We didn’t actually see this happening, but the fact that the incentive is there and that gives them a business reason to potentially not provide the best care, that was our problem,” Langrill said.

What’s next

Nothing changes in the short term, until the plan transitions to the new contract. The new contract takes effect June 16, 2023, In the meantime, Magellan is in an “implementation period,” when it prepares to transition to providing behavioral health services, according to Wolff, interim head of the Idaho Division of Purchasing.

Changes will happen sometime in 2024, an IDHW webpage says. Optum’s contract expires Feb. 29, 2024.

The Department of Health and Welfare said more information on the contract change will be shared when a transition date is established. 

Magellan’s new contract has a service date of March 1, 2024, lasting for four years until its end date of Feb. 29, 2028.

All eligible Idaho Medicaid members will receive a letter explaining the new managed care organization, the webpage says. New insurance cards will also be mailed to members on a future date.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Correction: This article was corrected to state that Optum Health’s proposal scored last for technical score and second for cost.

Posted on

MCO NEWS (FL)- State won’t answer Medicaid procurement questions until after July 4 holiday

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: We would like a break from the pain of the procurement process, please.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://floridapolitics.com/archives/621281-state-wont-answer-medicaid-procurement-questions-until-after-july-4-holiday/

 
 

The Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) won’t provide additional insights into its Statewide Medicaid Managed Care program until after July 4.

The state issued an “informational memo” Thursday afternoon with the announcement after a tentative June 27 deadline for it to respond to written questions about its invitation to negotiation (ITN) for the Statewide Medicaid Managed Care program came and went with no action. The brief notice says the agency’s responses to written questions will be included in an addendum to the ITN that won’t be published until “after the July 4 holiday.”

AHCA released the mammoth 956-page ITN in April. Interested parties were required to submit any questions they had about the ITN to the agency by May 3.

The questions, and the names of the entities that submitted them, are public records. Florida Politics first requested the information from AHCA in May, but the agency has not provided the requested information.

Some Medicaid managed care plan executives and lobbyists told Florida Politics in April they were surprised by a provision in the ITN regarding enrolling individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities into the Statewide Medicaid Managed Care program.

 
 

The ITN puts an increased emphasis on the delivery of behavioral health services and, according to the ITN, the agency intends to award contracts to “nationally accredited plans that offer an enhanced delivery system and integration of behavioral and physical health services.”

Florida’s existing managed care contracts expire on Dec. 31, 2024, and the ITN sets an ambitious timeline to ensure new contracts are negotiated, signed and executed by then. To that end, entities interested in participating in the program must submit their bids by noon on Aug. 15. The state anticipates holding a public opening of the bids at 3 p.m. the same day.

AHCA will invite 10 entities to negotiate for the Medicaid managed care contracts. The contracts are worth tens of billions of dollars to the entities that submit winning bids. Managed care plans and other managed provider networks that aren’t chosen to participate in the program are essentially locked out of Florida’s $38 billion Medicaid program until December 2030.

This is the third time the state has put its Statewide Medicaid Managed Care program up for competitive bid. According to the ITN, AHCA has used its past experiences to help inform the managed care networks it’s looking to contract with. But the third procurement does bring with it some changes. The number of Medicaid regions in the new ITN has been cut from 11 to nine and the numerical names for the regions have been replaced with letter names. The changes are a result of operational changes the Legislature agreed to pass in the 2022 Session.

Additionally, AHCA is allowed to award Medicaid managed care contracts on either a statewide or regional basis. For the first two procurements, AHCA was required to award regional contracts, only.

Post Views: 0

Posted on

STATE NEWS (NH)- Adults on Medicaid now have dental benefits. Many can’t get appointments.

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: But muh’ network adequacy numbers said I was good! (translation – a pile of LOIs does not a usable network make).

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://newhampshirebulletin.com/2023/07/05/adults-on-medicaid-now-have-dental-benefits-many-cant-get-appointments/

 
 

Less 15 percent of the state’s dentists have agreed to treat adult Medicaid patients as part of the state’s new New Hampshire Smiles Program. Many are not seeing them, however, due to staff shortages and low Medicaid rates. (Getty Images)

Three months after the state agreed to cover basic dental care for adults on Medicaid, less than 15 percent of the state’s 850 dentists and oral surgeons have signed on. And fewer are actually taking patients.

Almost half of those 125 providers in the state’s new New Hampshire Smiles Program have set limits on their participation. Some will take only five patients, and others want more time before taking any. 

Some dental practices are scheduling new patients for as early as August, but others have no openings for months or even years; a North Country practice doesn’t expect to be able to accept new patients, even those with commercial insurance, until 2025. 

In interviews with the Bulletin, providers cited staff shortages of dentists, hygienists, and dental assistants, and Medicaid reimbursement rates that cover just half the cost of many procedures. A myriad of efforts to recruit more dental practitioners to the state has promise, advocates say, but won’t bring a quick fix.

For now, that makes the math unfavorable for the 21,000 adults on Medicaid who the state expects to take advantage of the new program in the first year. Previously, New Hampshire was one of about 10 states that gave adults with Medicaid coverage for only emergencies, such as tooth extraction, but not regular preventative care like cleanings, x-rays, and exams. 

Cari Young, a program manager at Aspire Learning and Living, which serves people with disabilities, said a Concord practice offered her appointments in 2025 for her four clients. When Young said she’d take them, the receptionist put her on hold and never returned to the phone. Other practices have not returned her messages.

“It’s frustrating,” Young said. “They all deserve to have their teeth cleaned at least, even if they don’t have any dental work.”

State officials and oral advocates acknowledged the frustration of people like Young who’ve been unable to find care for their clients. But they are calling the first three months of the program a success.

 
 

Dr. Sarah Finne

The state is seeing an increasing number of claims submitted for reimbursement, from 1,000 in April to 2,000 in June, said Dr. Sarah Finne, dental director for the Department of Health and Human Services. That number does not reflect the number of patients seen, she said, because one patient may have multiple procedures.

Recruiting 125 providers this early in the program is also a success, said Finne and other advocates who’ve worked years to get adults on Medicaid dental coverage.  

Providers may be hesitant knowing they will lose money with low Medicaid rates. Some fear that Medicaid patients’ sometimes transient and complicated lives will lead them to miss precious few openings. And because adult Medicaid patients have never had coverage for preventative care, they are expected to have more acute conditions, such as abscesses, infections, and gum disease, which is why the recruitment of oral surgeons has been a focus.

“This (participation rate) is actually encouraging to me because initially, we weren’t sure they were going to go into it,” said Gail Brown, director of the New Hampshire Oral Health Coalition, which lobbied lawmakers for years to approve the program. “We were concerned they would say, ‘This isn’t for me,’ and go on with life as it is because, especially for the traditional private offices, they’re running their businesses.” 

 
 

Carrie Duran, a single mom from Wolfeboro, has lobbied lawmakers to support paid family leave and preventative dental care for adults with Medicaid. She is eligible for that care but cannot find a dentist in her area offering appointments. (Courtesy of MomsRising)

Carrie Duran, a single mother who has Medicaid, was there when Gov. Chris Sununu signed the dental benefit bill after lobbying for the legislation. Duran then visited dental practices with information about the program to encourage them to participate. 

But she’s been unable to get care for herself.

“I live in Wolfeboro, where dentists are more expensive,” Duran said. “They’re great. I’ve heard nothing but wonderful things about the dentists in our area. But none of them take Medicaid.” 

The directory of providers who’ve joined the New Hampshire Smiles Program lists two practices within 25 miles of Wolfeboro. Neither are taking new Medicaid patients. The next nearest provider is in Bristol, nearly 45 miles away. 

“I’m just sort of waiting until it becomes catastrophic,” Duran said. 

‘We don’t want people to go under’

Anticipating providers’ concerns about treating Medicaid patients, the state and Northeast Delta Dental, which won the $33.5 million contract to manage the program for the state, included two key services and financial incentives.

The contract provides eligible patients free transportation to and from appointments. And the program pays for care managers who help patients sort out the barriers causing them to miss appointments. 

“Both of those items are important because they help really give (Medicaid members) the support they need,” said Finne. “And if a dentist (takes on) one of our members, they don’t have to have that concern in the back of their mind that their patient is going to cancel at the last minute or not show because of other issues that are going on. We’re really trying to address that.”

Northeast Delta Dental is offering providers $1,000 to join the program to help with the administrative costs of getting credentialed, said Tom Raffio, president and CEO.

The insurer has hired DentaQuest to handle administrative tasks like billing, transportation, and care management services. Recognizing that providers lose money on Medicaid services, they increased the state’s minimum reimbursement rate for some more costly procedures. 

 
 

Dr. Jay Maillet

DentaQuest has arranged “hundreds” of trips for patients, said Dr. Jay Maillet, who oversees the New Hampshire program for the company. Family and friends who transport a patient can also get mileage reimbursement.

“We don’t want people to go under on this thing,” said Maillet, who practiced dentistry in the state for nearly five years before joining DentaQuest. “So we listened to providers.” 

‘We need the workforce’

Providers who’ve begun taking Medicaid patients are busy and will remain so until more join the program.

Allure Dentistry and Braces in Manchester is one of the approximately 50 practices that are participating without a limit on how many patients they will see.

“Our phone requests have pretty much tripled,” said office manager Jennifer Williams. They are currently giving new patients August appointments. “This is a corporate company and they are pretty open with trying to open up access as much as possible,” Williams said.

That’s much harder for smaller practices.

 
 

ABLE-NH, which advocates for people with disabilities, created postcards to help Medicaid patients seek care and encourage dentists to treat them. (Courtesy)

One dentist who has long worked with vulnerable populations began getting 80 calls a day when she said in a media interview that she planned to participate in the New Hampshire Smiles Program. “It was disabling our practice,” she said, asking not to be identified for fear the calls would resume if her name was publicly associated with the program again. 

She said she’s reconsidered her intentions to participate for two reasons: Her office is too small to meet the demand, and the financial losses would be too high. 

“Even the crown (reimbursement) fee is barely covering my lab fee, let alone my two hours of chair time, or my assistant, or the building and insurance,” she said. “Do you want to work the next hour at 25 percent of what you make because it’s the right thing?”

Raffio, who hopes to grow the network to 200 to 250 providers, is counting on more dentists to answer yes to that question. 

“It has to be what I call ‘Level Five Leadership,'” he said. “From the heart, you know? In the final analysis, you have to be willing to do a good deed for society because none of us want to get 50 cents on a dollar. I really do think you have to know that you’re doing this for the betterment of society.”

Coos County Family Dental is one of two North Country providers in the program but the only one taking patients. It is struggling to find appointments for a different reason: workforce shortages.

Ken Gordon, CEO of Coos County Family Health Services, which includes the dental clinic in Berlin, said they don’t expect to book new patients, even those with commercial insurance, until 2025. The nonprofit has partnered with Upper Connecticut Valley Hospital in Colebrook to open a second clinic there in September to meet demand. And it’s received a grant to double the size of the Berlin site.

“But there’s still the workforce issues we’ve got to contend with here,” he said. “We have the facility space, but we still need the workforce to join us.”

 
 

Tom Raffio, president and CEO of Northeast Delta Dental, said Solvere Health’s mobile clinic has expanded access to dental care for people on Medicaid. (Courtesy)

Expanding treatment with mobile clinics, teledentistry

While there is recognition the Medicaid reimbursement rate is an obstacle for some providers, it’s the access to dental care that state officials, oral health advocates, and dental training programs are trying the hardest to tackle now.

Those efforts include not only bringing more practitioners to New Hampshire but also expanding access to care in new ways.

Dentists may be eligible for help with student loans if they commit to taking Medicaid patients or practicing in rural areas. NHTI, which has the only hygienist and dental assistant training programs in New Hampshire, is collaborating with the state and advocacy groups to understand where expanded training or support is most needed.

Lisa Scott, chair of the school’s dental education department, said they’ve had about 20 people complete the hygienist program each of the last two years. The number of dental assistants, who can perform fewer procedures than a hygienist and must work under the direct supervision of a dentist, has gone from 16 last year to 12 this year, she said.

The Harvard School of Dental Medicine and College of Dental Medicine at the University of New England are placing students in public health centers, private practices, or rural areas of the state as part of their training. The hope is they’ll stay in the state. 

Sununu signed legislation on June 28 that will lift state licensing laws by allowing out-of-state professionals to practice in the state if their credential requirements are “substantially similar” to New Hampshire’s.

DentaQuest is referring people who cannot get an appointment but need care quickly to teledentistry.com, which will connect a Medicaid patient with a dentist able to consult virtually and prescribe antibiotics and some pain medication.

 
 

Solvere Heath’s mobile clinic provides cleanings, exams, x-rays, fillings, and restorations. (Courtesy)

Solvere Health’s mobile health clinics in Concord and Colebrook have been another new resource for adult Medicaid patients. Care includes diagnostic exams, x-rays, fillings, extractions, restorations, and antibiotics for infection.

Edward Lorch, the company’s CEO, said the state and Northeast Delta Dental have asked to continue those visits as a resource for people unable to find care in a traditional practice. The mobile clinic has done 120 appointments over the course of eight stops, in Concord, Berlin, and Colebrook, said Jackie Skorvanek, chief of staff. The number of patients is a bit less, she said, because some made a return visit.

“We really believe that the mobile unit, because of the comprehensive care, should be seen as a dental home,” Lorch said. “A lot of these rural areas are dental deserts. To think brick-and-mortar buildings are the only solution is a little bit foolhardy.” 

But brick and mortar is a solution Solvere Health is considering. Lorch said once the company better understands where the mobile clinic is most needed and would be most used, it will consider opening a dental office. 

“Workforce is the primary issue, but I think we have the wherewithal fiscally and culturally,” Lorch said.  “I feel really good about New Hampshire.”

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Posted on

REFORM (GA)- Georgia’s push for work requirements on some Medicaid coverage set to start

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Cue the 2 minutes of hate. It’s a 1984 reference. Look it up.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/georgias-push-work-requirements-some-medicaid-coverage-set-start/3IPCN63FVFFOLI2YQ6OJI7DDGA/

 
 

Kemp announces plan reshape Medicaid and individual insurance in Georgia (WSBTV.com News Staff)

(WSBTV.com News Staff)

ATLANTA — Georgia’s limited expansion to Medicaid launches Saturday, making the Peach State the first in the country to tie work requirements to some Medicaid benefits.

The program, called Pathways to Coverage, was first passed by the Georgia General Assembly in 2019, but faced a battle in the courts to enact it after President Joe Biden took office.

The Pathways program was first greenlit by former President Donald Trump in October 2020.

[DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]

In December 2021, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, sent a letter to Georgia officials citing concerns over how the policies would ” potentially create access barriers to health care coverage and cause harm to beneficiaries.”

Outside of this limited expansion, Georgia is one of just 10 states that has not expanded Medicaid eligibility since the passage and enactment of the Affordable Care Act.

As previously reported, the Georgia plan expands coverage to adults who earn up to 100% of the poverty line.

This means any single individual who earns $14,580 per year, or a family of four whose household income is $30,000.

Georgia Pathways is expected to cover about 64,000 Georgians, according to Georgetown University Health Policy Institute.

The coverage is only an option for those beneficiaries if the adults show they are working, volunteering, studying or in vocational rehabilitation for 80 hours each month.

TRENDING STORIES:

The program was approved to run through September 2025 by CMS.

In addition to concerns about patients losing their health coverage as a result of the policy, organizations focused on policy and economic issues in Georgia said the plan would also be more expensive than a normal Medicaid expansion.

The Georgia Budget and Policy Institute reported that the Pathways program would cost Georgia taxpayers roughly $249 million.

Gov. Brian Kemp said in January that up to 345,000 Georgians may be able to qualify over the program’s course, with the first year opening to between 31,000 and 100,000. He said unlike a Medicaid expansion, Georgia Pathways will not kick 200,000 Georgians off of private insurance.

Georgia Pathways is expected to help between 12% to 14% of the state population, according to Georgetown University.

The report also said the way Pathways is designed could leave workers out of eligibility due to the monthly reporting requirements, mostly in the food service and retail industries.

Speaking to the Associated Press, Caylee Noggle, commissioner of the Department of Community Health said Georgia has put a pause on removing people from their coverage during the unwinding process if the individuals are potentially eligible to transfer into the Pathways program.

“I think we are going to make it as easy as possible as we can for our members to verify their eligibility,” Noggle told the AP.

The program enrollment starts July 1, with the coverage set to begin in September.

[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]

OTHER NEWS:

Posted on

STATE NEWS (PA)- PA to Provide Health Care to the Homeless by Expanding Medicaid Coverage for “Street Medicine”

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Taking the care to the patient instead of taking the patient to the care.

 
 

Clipped from: https://pennwatch.org/pa-to-provide-health-care-to-the-homeless-by-expanding-medicaid-coverage-for-street-medicine/

 
 

The Pennsylvania Department of Human Services announced a change in Medicaid, also known as Medical Assistance in Pennsylvania, that will allow certain enrolled medical providers to provide care outside a clinical setting to Medicaid beneficiaries who are experiencing homelessness – a practice known as street medicine. Street medicine uses physical and behavioral health services to address the unique needs and circumstances of people experiencing unsheltered homelessness that are delivered directly to them in their own lived environment.

“As a physician, I understand that people experiencing homelessness often have complex needs and face many barriers to health care,” said DHS Secretary Dr. Val Arkoosh. “At DHS, we are consistently working to improve access to care and to ensure that all Pennsylvanians receive high-quality and compassionate health care that can stabilize circumstances and help improve their overall quality of life. By creating a path for Medicaid to cover street medicine, we are making it easier for health care providers to meet people where they are, and to provide the care they need and deserve.”

Medical services are provided by health care professionals who are equipped with portable medical equipment and can be rendered to anyone covered by Medicaid who is experiencing homelessness. Services could include but are not limited to primary care, vaccine administration, wound care, preventive services, counseling, medication for the treatment of opioid use disorder (also referred to as medication assisted treatment), and diagnostic services, such as rapid blood screening for diabetes and high cholesterol, rapid COVID-19 and flu testing.

This change applies to Medicaid enrolled physicians, certified nurse midwives, certified registered nurse practitioners, physician assistants, psychologists, and mobile mental health treatment providers, who render services in the Medicaid Fee-for-Service or Managed Care delivery systems.

People experiencing homelessness in the United States die, on average, three decades earlier than their peers with housing, most commonly due to preventable and treatable chronic medical conditions. By allowing providers to bill for services rendered during visits with people experiencing homelessness, DHS aims to increase access to care for Medicaid beneficiaries and improve health outcomes.

Street medicine visits will provide low-cost, high-impact resources that will also divert people from costly visits to emergency rooms. Health care utilization costs for people experiencing homelessness are five times the national average, mainly due to an over reliance on the emergency room for routine medical care and increased hospitalization rates for illnesses presenting in advanced stages.